See All Topics

Home / Section: Comic strips

Some Newspapers Drop October 11 Doonesbury – updated

original October 12 post:

Five weeks after The Atlantic article detailing alleged remarks by President Trump where he is unable to fathom military service, Garry Trudeau featured the contents of that article in his October 11, 2020 Doonesbury.

Because the article has been disputed, or because of the last two panels (“Nobody wants to see that”), at least three newspapers did not run the strip.

In a thread on Joey Thingvall’s Facebook page Brent Anderson reported that the San Francisco Chronicle ran the Sunday page, but just north of SF the Santa Rosa Press Democrat replaced the strip. The replacement strip, which mentions the Biden and Trump campaigns, is apparently a bunny strip created by Garry for those more timid editors.


Doonesbury © G. B. Trudeau

In that same thread Eilis Flynn says the Seattle Times also refused to run the original strip. And Mark Jackson, in a Keith Knight thread, notes that the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle went with the replacement.


above: first three panels of replacement strip courtesy Mark Jackson.

For what it’s worth Stars and Stripes ran the full original strip in their weekend edition.

 

October 17 – update

So Garry Trudeau, who has never to my (limited) knowledge offered “bunny strips” as a replacement to newspaper editors, did not offer any such thing to them for the October 11 Sunday. The “replacement” strip was this weekend’s (October 18) Sunday strip bumped up a week.


Check date in above panel.

So now the question becomes – do newspapers that ran this week’s strip last week run it again? Or do they stay a week ahead for a time? Or did the syndicate go with the bump as an emergency measure and will now offer a rerun to fill the gap?

Community Comments

Currently there are 16 Comments
Stay up-to-date on the comments by subscribing to the comments RSS feed.

#1 Carl Buick
October/12/2020
@ 6:05 pm

Thanks for the article. Why any military person; Active, Retired, or veteran votes for Trump is beyond me. (from a 100 pct, combat related, Disabled Veteran.) It was chicken s**t for those papers to not run the original strip.

#2 Robert Gidley
October/12/2020
@ 6:08 pm

“The Seattle Times” went with the bunny strip, minus the throw-away panels.

#3 George Paczolt
October/13/2020
@ 6:07 am

If you read the Richmond (VA) Times Dispatch, this is noting new. Although the paper did print this past Sunday’s comic verbatim. They have refused to print two anti-Trump Doonesburys in the past two months however, with no comment. The best correlation I’ve been able to come up with is that if Trudeau is showing Trump with bloody hands, they won’t run it.

#4 Mario500
October/13/2020
@ 9:10 am

“It was chicken s**t for those papers to not run the original strip.”

Was profanity intended for this sentence (if so, why)?

#5 Jim Ellwanger
October/13/2020
@ 9:36 am

The Los Angeles Times also ran the replacement strip. I’m actually a little surprised because, although they once took a heavier hand with the content of their comics than many other newspapers, those days seemed to be gone (due to both changing editorial standards and fewer people being on staff).

#6 Carl Buick
October/13/2020
@ 11:44 am

Answer to Mario500. ((You asked for this answer.) Any veteran (and this cartoon is related to disabled veterans and the newspapers that refused to acknowledge how Trump empathizes with them) knows that the term is a descriptor of cowardly behavior. Yes, the term is vulgar, but I only alluded to the vulgar part by using asterisks. The vulgarity here, is the attitude of DT and the press that still coddles him.

#7 Ignatz
October/17/2020
@ 6:34 am

By censoring the strip, aren’t the newspapers making Trudeau’s point? (“Nobody wants to see that.”)

#8 Tara Gallagher
October/17/2020
@ 9:04 am

I emailed the Seattle Times features editor that Monday to ask about not running the strip, and have heard nothing.

#9 Jon McAdams
October/18/2020
@ 3:32 am

Couldn’t newspapers print the original strip as a political cartoon? Many recent political cartoons are far more pointed.

#10 Patti Stirn
October/18/2020
@ 4:59 am

#Mario500: According to the free dictionary by Farlex, the term profane means, “Marked by contempt or irreverence for what is sacred.” Rump was profane.

#11 Mark Jackson
October/18/2020
@ 7:12 am

“So now the question becomes – do newspapers that ran this week’s strip last week run it again?”

That’s what the Rochester (NY) /Democrat and Chronicle/ did this morning.

#12 Bandit Gangwere
October/18/2020
@ 10:25 am

It’s very simple. Rump has no honor. He doesn’t even understand the concept.

#13 Steven R
October/18/2020
@ 12:36 pm

The southern New Mexico papers (they run the same comics to do just one large print one) ran the “bunny strip” last week, and apparently the same strip again the next week.

#14 Ed Behan
October/18/2020
@ 7:45 pm

The Fort Collins Coloradoan did not run it, choosing to put the strip scheduled for Oct. 18 instead. The editor blamed King Features Syndicate for making that call, but it is clear it was published just fine. I may have to do some research at King to find out. . . Our paper is also in the USA Today/Gannett network. Any indication if they made a call on the strip?

Telling that the Stars and Stripes ran it as is. . .

#15 Olivia Simonich
October/19/2020
@ 12:21 am

He’s merely reporting what trump said. Those newspapers that censored Trudeau should follow trump’s advice about Corona virus to not be afraid to go out there & live their lives.

#16 Tara Gallagher
October/19/2020
@ 9:48 am

And the Seattle Times printed the one about musicians *again*

Join the discussion!

PLEASE NOTE: Please use your first AND last name when posting a comment. Please refrain from swearing. It's one of the rules that I enforce strictly. Thanks.

Want a cool icon next to your name? Go add one to Gravatar.com

*
*
This will not be published

(Optional)