Comic Strip of the Day Comic Strips

CSotD: What a Day for a Humpday

This is where I’ve landed on the Odyssey movie. I’ve heard it praised and I’ve heard it trashed and the outcome seems to be that it’s neither fish nor flesh, nor good red herring and I know herring is a fish, but there’s your problem: The idiom is poetic and apparently we can’t have that.

Just as we can’t have gods running around interfering in the important matters of swords and sandals. Olympian gods are a challenge, certainly, but the real challenge is how do you make Homer into a movie with the same impact it had on its original audience?

You probably can’t, and not just because of the gods. When we were reading the Aeneid in seminar, one of our professors who was particularly versed in translation came in and read us a passage about a cavalry charge in the original text, to demonstrate Vergil’s mastery of rhythm and onomatopoeia. And I suppose to impress upon us how little of it we could get by reading it in English. And that was Latin; Greek poetry is reportedly even harder to translate effectively.

I think I’d rather watch Sinbad and the Eye of the Tiger than see someone trying, and failing, to adapt Homer to a 21st century audience, perhaps with Clash of the Titans (the real one) as a compromise. Both movies were very entertaining and made no pretense of being “cinema.”

Joyce Carol Oates apparently agrees with me, though a fellow at the Guardian felt compelled to rebut her off-handed comment, thereby demonstrating how to take everything, and particularly yourself, way too seriously.

Now, here’s a contemporary take on Homer’s great epic. Note that most of the characters he encounters are every bit as realistic as Athena and the Sirens and Circe and Poseidon.

Also on the topic of Facebook: While we wait for genuine, practical add-ons to delete AI, I’d like one that automatically deletes food shots.

Email was so much easier. I had spam filters set for all sorts of annoying things I didn’t want to read.

We also had more control over who we heard from. Back then, hitting “Reply All” was often a ghastly, career-ending mistake. But with Facebook, it’s the default.

Speaking of our increasingly shameless culture, it was quite a jolt to hear my mother say the word “cornhole.” I’m sure she only knew it in terms of that game, but still.

I don’t have a problem with the game itself, but hauling around that big board is sure more of a pain than having two sections of pipe and half a dozen horseshoes in the trunk of your car. I’d also contend that horseshoes is a game than employs more skill than tossing beanbags, and that the chink! of a well-tossed shoe hitting the pipe is particularly satisfying, which seems the gist of Lola’s well-founded objection to Nerf horseshoes.

There was such a thing, but it’s apparently gone. However, Amazon has a collection of plastic horseshoe sets for those who want to play indoors. I think you have to drink sody pop rather than beer while you pitch plastic rather than genuine horseshoes.

Amazon also lists an outdoor set in which the shoes appear to have little cutouts to help you pitch them and have them hang onto the post.

They sell bicycles with training wheels, too, but you can take them off.

AI has its uses, mostly in things like coding that aren’t exactly mindless but that take up a lot of time better spent doing something else. When I was doing media education, I had an assistant who was tasked with entering orders, billing, making and collating handouts and so forth. But a computer handled spreadsheets and generated bills, and a photocopier made copies.

A far cry from the days of clerks perched on stools copying out financial records and suchlike. One of my assistants ran some newspapers up to a classroom in the mountains and I expected her back in an hour or so. When she didn’t return, I got a little worried, but she was back midafternoon, with the explanation, “I was teaching some classes.”

She was a lot more valuable than some poor wretch endlessly dipping a quill into an inkpot.

On the other hand, I don’t know whether to be more appalled that Rory thinks he’s producing art or that the people who buy his slop-caricatures think they’re getting some. There’s currently a brouhaha going on because Substack added a feature where you can tell if a blog was written by a person or by AI and bloggers are defending their use of AI because “it helps me gather my thoughts.”

I understand using AI if you’re in a job that requires memos and reports and you’re not a good writer, but having a blog is holding yourself out to be a writer. It’s a question of ethics.

“I run five miles every morning.”
“Really? Don’t you worry about shin splints?”
“No, I use a golf cart.”

Subscribing to a Substack that someone cranks out on ChatGPT is like paying Rory to generate an AI caricature.

The Big Book of Jokes is an excellent choice for a book report. I wish we’d heard the rest of Thandi’s report, because I suspect the problem is not her book selection or her delivery of a critique but, rather, her teacher’s rigid ideas of what a book report ought to be.

One of my challenges when I was editing a kid-written publication for the Denver Post was convincing the kids that they should write their own honest conclusions, not what they expected me to reward, because they’d learned in school that Pleasing Teacher was the goal of writing.

Which meant when they were reviewing a book — we got hoards of new books from publishers — they felt they needed to find a “message.” Maybe the Hunger Games contains a message, but Captain Underpants does not.

This alleged requirement for messages is why so many award-winning children’s books are such preachy crap.

What is Kyle Bravo’s message? Explain your answer in a way that will rob the cartoon of all wit and humor.

Freddy’s gone, but thank god we’ve got more Abigail Beechers today!

Mike Peterson has posted his "Comic Strip of the Day" column every day since 2010. His opinions are his own, but we welcome comments either agreeing or in opposition.

Previous Post
Comic Art News and Reviews
Next Post
Cristina, Carrilho, Fazenda Targeted by Neo-Nazi Group
Cartoon by Cristina Sampaio

Comments 20

  1. “Aristotle, for one, wasn’t all that impressed by Odysseus’s adventures. In the seventeenth chapter of his Poetics he observes, apropos of the relationship of a story’s “essential” meaning to its constituent episodes, that:
    the storyline of the Odyssey is not long. A man has been away from his homeland for many years, and Poseidon is always on the watch for him, and he is all alone. Meanwhile, the situation at home is such that his wealth is being consumed by the Suitors, who are plotting against his son. But after a storm-tossed journey he returns, and after revealing himself and attacking them is saved and destroys his enemies. That is the essential; everything else is episodes.”
    (Christopher Nolan’s Artfully Woven Odyssey | Daniel Mendelsohn | The New York Review of Books July 17, 2026)

    1. To think that Homer invented serial television.

      D’oh!

      1. Television? Is that thing still around?

    2. Aristotle’s Poetics is one of his more readable books, but he was much more concerned with structure than nuance. Which makes him more artistic than Plato, but that’s damning with faint praise. We use the word “tragedy” a great deal more freely than Aristotle would allow, which makes watching the local news difficult for classics scholars. However, if you handed him a flower, he’d closely examine the stamen and pistil and would barely notice its smell or color.

  2. Is it me or does your ‘Humpday Humor’ give me more to think about than the regular “zomg look at what Trump did NOW” content? Not that Trump is an issue to be ignored, but god DAMN when is this guy ever going to become little more than a bad memory?

    Anyway, good stuff. I just came across a couple of images from accounts I follow on insta, and holy damn I spent the better part of 30 minutes trying to discern if one was simply an A.I. copy of the other. There were enough subtle differences to make me unsure (and it looks the actual guy) but the overall composition was exactly the same to the point where it couldn’t possibly have been a fluke. Both images were posted just a few hours apart (with the A.I.-ish one being later, of course)

    So yeah, I am all for “This post was generated by A.I.” content labels/warnings.
    If you need A.I. to organize your thoughts, you clearly don’t have any.

    And just think, Scrooge would never have met Marley had A.I. existed back then to handle all the number-crunching and accounting.

    1. I get your point but Scrooge and Marley were partners and they would not have met Bob Cratchit, their clerk and father of Tiny Tim, and therefore the story would not be told. Yeah, it seems petty to me, too.

    2. Humpdays do give me more latitude for mental wandering, yes. As for Dickens, I don’t think we know where Marley came from before they were partners, but you may have been thinking of Bob Cratchit, Scrooge’s clerk. I was thinking of another Dickens’ clerk, Pip, as well as the poor schlub in King Vidor’s silent classic “The Crowd.” And, of course, the junior clerk who copied all the letters so carefully that now he was the ruler of the Queen’s navy.

      In the 19th Century, clerks and office boys also learned Morse code, and a lot of newspaper reporters began as those lowly types. There was a point in the 1890s at which the White House moved a telegraph operator’s desk farther from the reception area because reporters waiting there could overhear and translate incoming messages. The report didn’t tell how long it was before someone figured that out, but my recollection is that it happened with a new administration.

    1. Odd; that’s not my experience. I’ve found a good analysis tends to make a good joke stronger, as the craft and ingenuity put into it are clearer, and can be better admired. Maybe you disect jokes badly.

      1. I think it depends on the joke and how much there is to it to get analyzed, as well as whether the analyzer is able to sufficiently analyze it and get their points through without beating the joke into the ground. All of this applies to analysis in general, jokes often are just harder to analyze because there’s less material to work off of. Very few people are able to analyse stuff well. I know I can’t.

  3. G-mail instituted an A.I. “helper” which I’ve been unable to disable, which lingers just below the paragraph you’ve just typed and asks if you surely wanted to distill all that nonsense you’ve just spent a half hour composing into a summation without any nuance of things you wanted to tell your best friend in your own voice, reduced to a list. I would never ask it to do so, but I accidentally hit that little prompt once. It removed all of my work, summed it all up in one fifth of the space, took out all my witty asides and all of my personality, and then, to add the final insult, changed my valediction of more than fifty years of “Best,” to “Best wishes,” which I have NEVER signed off with in any letter I’ve ever sent in my life. How A.I. knows that what I was offering were my wishes and not my friendship or my hope for a pleasant day or life, is why A.I. will never replace a real correspondent with intuited feelings. (I actually started using “Best,” because an older friend I idolized signed off his letters with “Bestest,” which I loved but felt I couldn’t purloin his original creation.)

    1. This is why, if it’s not a business-related email, I pick up the phone and call someone.

      I’d like to see AI try to edit my voice while I am talking to someone.

  4. I have to agree with you. As I scuttled out of “The Odyssey’ shaking my head and wishing for three hours of my life back, I thought, “the only director who could have done this ANY justice is Ray Harryhausen and he’s dead.”

  5. Maybe the Hunger Games contains a message, but Captain Underpants does not.

    If The Hunger Games does have a message, I’m not sure knowing it will improve my life. But I think we can all rally around the message of “use the potty; be a hero!”

  6. One of the other websites I read regularly is the-numbers.com. A few months ago, AI Bots destroyed the entire website and they’re still rebuilding.

  7. I think “The Big Book of Jokes” would be fine for a book report, although it wouldn’t be the usual report.”

    “What I most enjoyed about ‘The Big Book of Jokes’ was that all my favorite characters were back: the man from Nantucket, the girl from Anchises, the woman from Norway who hung by her heels in the doorway…”

    Related to that is a Beetle Bailey comic strip from many years ago. Zero is reading a very thick book. Disgusted with it, he slams it to the floor and says, “This book is terrible. Too many characters and no plot.”

    Beetle picks up the book. It’s the phone book.

    I recently finished reading a fairly recent translation of Ovid’s Metamorphoses. It has a lot of the Odyssey and Aeneid stuff in it. But every page brings in at least three and maybe five or ten new characters, only one of which will ever be heard from again. Every soldier in every battle is named; likewise every guest at every dinner party. Well, I suppose since we all memorized the names of Santa’s reindeer we can learn the names of all of Actaeon’s hounds who tore him to shreds after Diana turned him into a stag.

    1. I read the Odyssey to my boys when they were little and it went well, but the Iliad seemed mostly a list of people who were biting the dust (his metaphor, more or less). In school, we spoke of the catalogues, but largely in terms of the description of Achilles’ shield, not the listing of every KIA soldier.

      I included Acteon in a series of stories for kids, thinking it was a good lesson about personal privacy that could be worked into a good touch/bad touch lesson, but teachers saw it as a naked lady story. So much for teaching values.

  8. Seventh Voyage of Sindbad and Golden Voyage of Sindbad had terrific actors like Kerwin Matthews, Torin Thatcher, Patrick Wayne and Tom Baker. They were more than a match for “Dynamation”.

  9. ‘…things like coding that aren’t exactly mindless but that take up a lot of time better spent doing something else.”
    Programming well (logical flow that can be easily maintained, for ex) is time consuming, but necessary for the long term success of any websie, software or app. AI cannot do it well. Updating or changing any bit if their output often leads to failure of the entire system. If one cannot update regularly, the easy rooute becomes far less cost effective and much more expensive. Thank to this naf rush to use ai instead of human beings, there are tens of tens of thousands of full time coders out of work, most for longer than any ever thought possible. My husband is one of them. His tech meetup group out of Boston is now full of unemployed coders who cannot even get a single interview. For us, its been 19 mo and there is no end in sight. The others have similar stories. For good reporting on the reality of ai, check out the legendary tech journalist Corey Doctorow. His work is very enlightening.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.