Comic Strip of the Day

CSotD: Core Values

Breen

Steve Breen on an issue a lot of people wish would simply stay in the closet.

But I started hearing about the conditions under which iPhones and iPads are made in China a little over a week ago, and have since seen the story in the New York Times and echoed elsewhere.

It's not the first time this has come up, but there were details lacking before.

There's nothing new about the fact that overseas workers make less than American workers would. But the common response is that, well, yes, but the cost of living is so much lower over there that, while they're not living an American middle-class lifestyle, they are able to live in a way that is appropriate for their world.

This is way beyond comparisons of living standards. We're talking basic human rights. Human, mind you.

Hon Hai has a workforce of over one million worldwide and as human beings are also animals, to manage one million animals gives me a headache.”

We're talking about double-shifts of 12 hours each, of people living in dormitories that resemble the crew quarters of a 19th century merchant ship, of people — not animals — dying from overwork and unsafe practices.

Apple claims to be responding.

Me, I think they're gonna need a bigger closet.

Or maybe not.

It may prove to be a hard sell, after years of programming people to believe that music and art and information all want to be free, to make them turn 180 degrees and suddenly recognize the link between their economic choices and the lives of those who produce the things they want.

As the fellow in that last linked article says, "Apple already has a premium price, you'd think they should be doing something on their end of it to make it right, you know? It isn't like they're passing on a huge savings to us compared to other PC makers."

We've promoted Moron Economics throughout the nation.

On the right, we've got Moron Macroeconomics, in which the national budget is the same as your family budget, but with more zeros, and in which hard times are resolved by simply not buying things.

Never by increasing revenue by working overtime or taking a second job or, in the more-zeros case, by raising taxes. Perhaps the family can make things work by turning the thermostat down to 55 and by cutting the food allowance for the children and not taking them to the doctor or dentist anymore.

On the left, we pitch Moron Microeconomics, which is basically "how to justify on-line shoplifting," based on the idea, as stated above, that the stores make too much money anyway, but, on a more sweeping level, that artists and musicians and writers should produce that stuff for free, perhaps after coming home from their real jobs.

Are there ways to sensibly rein in the nation's budget? Absolutely.

Are there models for music and art that don't include major corporations acting as middlemen? You bet.

Are those practical, reality-based solutions what anyone is talking about 90 percent of the time? Come on, now — 90 percent is too harsh. Make it 80 percent. And, no.

So the iPad2 sells for $499.

Would you pay $699 for it? Or, say, $574?

Or is it someone else's responsibility to find a way to fix things without costing you more money?

Which brings up this question: If artists shouldn't be paid, and musicians shouldn't be paid, and Apple shouldn't make money and Chinese factory workers shouldn't be paid, who the hell is paying you? And why?

Okay. Back off. Deep breath.

How about this solution:

The iPad2 will still sell for $499, but, when you buy one, you'll be offered the opportunity to donate another $75 that will go to fund better working conditions, shorter hours, better pay for the people who make the device.

(Yes, I know, but I like to include an element of humor each day.)

 

Previous Post
Chris Britt laid off from State Journal-Register
Next Post
10,000 downloaded R Stevens’ Diesel Sweeties iBook

Comments 10

  1. As a Left Winger, I protest the characterization that any of us are in favor of stiffing artists, writers and other workers in the name of some right to ‘free stuff.’ If anything, the Left stands for Unions, or at least to right to a Living Wage.
    The people who rip off our creative talent are child-minded (whatever age they are) leaches who’ve learned from parents Left AND Right that they are Entitled to get away with whatever they can. You can try to peg it to leftover ’70’s “Power to the People” Lefties or Greed is Good Righties if you want, but it’s only lousy morals, stuff any thinking person of any stripe rejects.

  2. Thanks for the element of humor at the end. It almost made it worth getting that far.

  3. Ted, that’s a correction I’ll accept.
    Tombo, don’t forget to use Chapstick. It’ll minimize the pain on these longer posts.

  4. A serious answer to the serious question about how much I’d be willing to pay for an iPad taking workers’ conditions into account: We have an iPad, which we consider to be a luxury item. We saved the equivalent of spare change for it, and it didn’t take long. We would have been more than willing to save twice as long and pay twice as much.
    Our righteousness would be sorely tested, though, if we were asked the same question about something we consider to be more necessary.

  5. Mike, did you happen to catch episode 454 of This American Life? it is about this very topic. I posted a link and small editorial item about it over on my blog:
    http://overbookedandunderpaid.typepad.com/overbooked-and-underpaid/2012/01/a-life-changing-program.html
    Mike Daisey does an excellent job of painting the picture of chinese labor (he went over there personally) with a storytelling approach that has enough humor to keep you interested but enough pathos to make you care. It takes about 40 minutes to listen to the whole thing but it is well worth it.

  6. And how many layers of management would my $75 have to go through to reach those workers? Bwahahahaha!

  7. Mary, I think the real question is, would you pay the extra money to move production back here? I was going to say “to the workers” but felt the extra $75 might allow a contract with a less Dickensian company and one that might be more readily monitored.
    But it really comes back to parsing out Sherwood’s question — would we do it for something we felt necessary rather than for a luxury item. At that point, we get into what people consider necessary in the face of a world that might question their categorization.
    And Anne, yes, that was one of the links above but worth clicking on if you missed it there, so glad to have it again. I was driving home listening to it and being absolutely appalled. Spellbinding stuff. If they were treating animals like this, PETA would be all over them.

  8. Haw! (that last bit).
    Agree with Ted here – I really don’t think this “everything is entitled to me for free” has anything to do with left or right. It’s everywhere.

  9. Sorry Mike, I’m afraid I read through your article but didn’t click on any of the links so I missed that one of them was to the This American Life story 🙂
    A point that is easy to miss is that Mike Daisey isn’t only pitching on Apple, though Apple is the company getting most of the negative press, Foxconn makes products for EVERYONE, Dell, Nokia, every electronic gadget we use across the board. And, of course, we know electronics are just the tip of the iceberg. Probably upwards of 80% of our everyday products of every stripe are being made in similar sweat shops all over the pacific rim.
    There was a reason China dismantled their version of the EPA years ago. It was impeding their plan to attract manufacturing. Companies don’t just move their operations to China because the labor is cheap, they also do so because the Chinese government holds the health of its citizens in low enough regard to expose them to toxins other countries have banned.

  10. We care if they poison our dogs. Nice they haven’t poisoned any of our kids that we know of. Other’n that, keep those prices low!
    I was a business reporter on the Canadian border when the first Free Trade Agreement came along and it made a lot of sense. We share so much with Canada already that lowering the barriers was a logical move. But as that morphed into NAFTA and brought in Mexico, there were questions about wage disparities and work conditions that bothered some people.
    There were problems with tariffs. The largest problem was that they helped preserve jobs, while dropping them helped enhance profits.
    Hard to believe it was only 20 years ago. Unless, y’know, you’re 28.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.