Comic Strip of the Day Editorial Cartooning

CSotD: I Read The News Today Oy Vey

I didn’t watch the White House Concubines Association dinner, but I’ve certainly seen a mountain of videos, summaries and outraged reactions.

Someone asked on-line why everyone in the room didn’t get up and walk out when he insulted Kaitlin Collins, but that’s a silly question, because the fact that they were even there answers it. The ones who felt his presence outweighed the point of the dinner were already home and they didn’t have to hear what he had to say to know where he stands anyway.

Collins was there to pick up an award. If you’ve never been involved in one of these dinners, you may not know that, even if the awards are secret until announced, you get a call ahead of time, or your boss does, saying that you really need to be there that night. As for the insults he directed at her, getting up and flouncing out of the room would have handed him a victory. By sitting there and taking it, she proved she could, which makes her a bigger person than he is.

As for criticism of the ones who applauded, that’s a puzzlement, because journalists are supposed to attend events as observers, not fans, and you should be taking notes, not clapping. But, obviously, when it’s a gathering of journalists, that rule changes. Sort of. You can applaud each other, but applauding the president undermines your neutrality, which raises the central question of why he’s there in the first place.

As Wuerker notes, the audience was full of organizations that Dear Leader has sued, and I got to read excerpts of his speech in which he insulted them all over again.

The scholarships and such are worthwhile, but the dinner has long degenerated into an overwrought embarrassment for the profession. Perhaps this year’s debacle will finally lance the growing boil and convince serious journalists to recast the thing entirely.

Fortunately for them, the attendees didn’t have to question whether they should laugh at the president’s jokes, because they weren’t funny. Hunter Biden pointed out that in order to tell a joke, you need a level of self-reflection that Trump lacks, to which I would add that you also need empathy so you know what people expect and how to flip that into a surprising, insightful twist.

I’m reading Killing Baby Hitler, a political/sci-fi satire worth picking up, and in it one of the characters tries to get his futuristic AI companion to tell a joke, but she sees things so literally that she can’t. Not being human, she can anticipate his needs, but she can’t feel what he feels.

Watching a speaker flounder can be dreadful if you are sympathetic to him, but it inspires schadenfreude if you aren’t. And if you have sufficient empathy to tell a joke yourself, you should be ashamed to feel too much schadenfreude. It’s inescapable, but it’s not admirable.

I originally filed this Mr. Boffo in my Humpday folder, but I’ll drop it here because if fits the moment. I don’t mind selfies, though if you’re going to take a selfie at Bridalveil Falls, back off so we can at least glimpse them in the background.

Vacation selfies are okay, but I really hate selfie-preachy-videos where somebody puts their big fat face right up to the camera and explains important insights and things that matter. If we were in person — which is presumably the intent — I’d take a step or two back, even if I didn’t feel the need to offer you a mint. Find some illustrations instead of just your face, or at least back up a little.

Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.

Juxtaposition of the Day

There have been a number of cartoons lampooning Trump’s putting tariffs on Canada because of the wildfires up there, some pointing out that Canada and Mexico have both helped us with our own fires, and some pointing out the role of climate change in causing them and his role in advancing climate change.

Artley is, I think, speaking metaphorically in suggesting that Iran is another stain on the world stage, but he could be literal if he’d like, because there is apparently still a refinery fire burning in Saudi Arabia from a Houthi drone strike, which reminded me of when the retreating Iraqi army lit oil wells in Kuwait, turning out a massive cloud of black, nasty smoke and pollutants. And the fact that the Saudi fire wasn’t from an American strike doesn’t erase the fact that we know who started that whole thing.

Baron poses the wildfires in Spain and France as the product of uncaring people who ignore climate change, but I’d point out that we haven’t found a way to keep smoke from crossing international borders, and, if British toffs aren’t getting any at the moment, they can credit the weather and their air conditioners, not their own uncaring indifference.

Don’t throw away your N-95s; you never know when the wind will shift. A friend who grew up in London half a century ago was telling me of going to school on bad days with a handkerchief over her nose and mouth, barely able to see through the smog, and how grit from Sahara dust storms settled on everything. The coal furnaces are mostly gone, but the sirocco remains.

It’s a small world after all.

Juxtaposition of the Day #2

Should we be afraid of the sudden resurrection of McCarthyism? Or is the relevant question “Have we no sense of decency, at long last?”

Bill Day lampoons the new Red Scare as a sign of desperation, given the dismal polls facing the GOP for the coming midterms, and he’s probably right. Huck puts a less comical spin on the strategy, and a wander through Xitter will quickly confirm that the theme has been adopted, at least by the troll factory employees.

Does anybody know what “communism” really is? And what is socialism? And what difference could it possibly make?

The Great Communist Conspiracy is a real thing, by yompin’ yiminy, and them commies plan to come out from under our beds and blow up Mount Rushmore.

Seriously. The president said so himself.

Mike Peterson has posted his "Comic Strip of the Day" column every day since 2010. His opinions are his own, but we welcome comments either agreeing or in opposition.

Previous Post
So How Long Does a Pregnancy Last in Luann Time?
Next Post
Bleeker, 20 Years of Recharging

Comments 14

  1. I never understood the need for people to take selfies (this coming from a person who hates having to have his picture taken by anyone…the last time someone took a picture of me it was for my driver’s license about 5 years ago).

    If you want to take a picture of a beautiful place, just do it–don’t feel you have to insert yourself into it and spoil it.

    1. My husband is an amateur photographer; he takes mostly underwater photos. But when we’re out and about, he has a routine called “Nice Guy Time” – when he sees families trying to get a family photo where one parent or other person will be left out, he will politely step in and offer to take the picture so they can all be in it. They usually happily agree. (And if the kids are little, he’ll tell them he usually takes pictures of fish, so they must do their best “fish face” for one photo).

      We usually get an offer to return the favor but we mostly turn in down. We have plenty of photos of us as a couple and will usually only get one if it’s a special occasion (like the photo of us in front of Union Pacific “Big Boy” 4014 when it was at the Steamtown National Historic Site/Train Museum in Scranton last month. We wanted that for our memories).

    2. My family is SE Asian, and with them selfies/posted shots were expected during travel. It wasn’t enough to take a picture of a landmark; family members had to stand in front of the landmark for the photo, because it was proof in those pre-Photoshop days that we were there. “If I wanted just a picture, I’d buy a postcard,” my mother explained, “I need family in there.” That’s why there are pictures of me standing next to a wax Bob Geldof at Madame Tussaud’s, me buying pizza on a French train, me in front of a Parisian movie theater, and me mimicking a certain off-kilter edifice in Pisa, because it showed that the family went on a monthlong European trip together.

      And it’s not just my family. Some SE Asian family friends shared photographs of their own trip, and they were in every … single … shot, even on a boat tender to a remote island.

    3. Mark Twain said pretty much the same thing about graffiti on ancient monuments in Innocents Abroad and Captain Stormfield’s Visit to Heaven.

  2. The irony of Trump’s claim about Communists taking over the country is the deals he made for partial government ownership of companies including tech and steel. The “Trump Account” giving every child born in the US between Jan. 1, 2025 and Dec. 31, 2028 reeks of socialism.
    But try telling the true believers that.

    1. Exactly, since I first encountered the concept of a Trump Bond via a Democrat. Cory Booker’s 2020 Presidential campaign website proposed “baby bonds”. Every baby born in America would receive a $2,000 bond, and on each birthday up to the 18th. the government would contribute to the bond an additional $2,000 (or fewer, depending on the family’s income), plus any applicable interest rates. When the child reaches age 18, the tax-free $36,000-plus-accrued-interest would be available, thus allowing them to work toward “adulting” things like college/voc tech/helping out family/securing an apartment/whatever. Baby bonds could be seen as “socialism”, but they said that about Social Security back then, and now it’s untouchable.

  3. It’s such a Pavlovian reaction that Boomers developed as a result of the Red Scare whenever they see or hear “commies” or “socialism” like, you people don’t even know what you’re afraid of.

    It’s a trick that still works on older folk, but it’s proven to not be so effective on the young’uns.

    Interestingly, I’d say it goes hand-in-glove with the growing acceptance of LGBT people. Another instance where the older generations were taught to fear what they didn’t understand, but the kids today have grown up with the internet and social media and LGBT people in media has become more commonplace and less scary.

    Not that there hasn’t been pushback and fearmongering, but again that’s mainly from old-timers and those who still cling to outdated “traditional” values that have proven time and again to cause more harm than good. On some level they know they’re a dying breed, and that makes them all the more dangerous.

    1. The oldest boomers were about eight years old when McCarthyism fell apart with Welch’s rebuke. It’s always been touted as fanatical, ungrounded panic to that generation, the eldest of whom are now turning 80. As you say, it’s not playing with even younger folks except those who want to believe whatever they’re told. But entire empires have been built by telling loyal listeners things that make no objective sense.

      1. I remember a lot of my friends back then saying, “If they tell all those lies about marijuana, what else are they lying about?”

    2. I beg to disagree. I am a Boomer, but I do not overreact to the terms “commie” or “socialist”. Remember that younger radical, racist groups exist. The average age of the Proud Boys is thrty-six. The Neo-Nazis are comprised of a wide range of ages from teens to the elderly. Does this mean that all young people are radical and racist?
      To lump all of a certain age as being of one mind is as discriminatory as any other discrimination. I know many older people who are open minded and try to evaluate all sides of an argument before making a judgement.
      I appreciate your outlook, but I urge you to beware of generalizations.

      1. Not sure I get it. Are you saying you disagree because you are scared that communists are taking over the country? You’re entitled to believe that, but I don’t think it’s a typical fear of most people in our demographic. However, “generalizations” should admit to exceptions. We wouldn’t have the president we have if everybody born in the baby boom had rejected his political theories.

      2. Mike, it reads to me as if Mark is replying to AJ, not you. He disagrees with AJ’s first sentence about Boomers’ reaction to “commie” and “socialist,” because he is a Boomer and does not have that reaction, nor do other older people he knows. If you read it that way it should make more sense.

  4. I know that posting this so much after the original post is pointless, but I’m doing it anyway.

    Kaitlin, if she were a much different person than she is (I’ve never seen her depart from her reporter persona even as the host of her own show) should have said, “I’d smile if you gave me any reason to do so.”

    The true irony is that, from the days in 2017 when I still watched CNN and saw her reporting on the White House lawn in natural lightning, I actually commented to my brother, “She’s going to be a star”–and it was partly because her resting facial expression was an unmistakable smile. I’ve noticed that since then, whether it’s the lighting, or producers actively suppressing that perpetual grin, indoors on a set, she’s no longer doing that. I think that President Dirtbag’s animosity for her is a combination of his deep-seated hatred of all women (stemming from his maternal issues) combined with his obvious attraction to her (and other women), the type of mental confusion which created his frequent sexual molestation/assaults of his younger years, but which now, by necessity (since he realizes in his dirty, black mind that he can no longer get away with physically abusing them), his overwhelming urges have to be redirected to filthy verbal malevolence. What do you want? He’s a sick old president.

    1. I wish I could write like this. I read late posts so please, continue.

      Anyhow, after reading his niece’s book (she’s a psychologist), I’d say he’s got mommy AND daddy issues. Shoot, at this point, I’d say he’s got third cousin twice removed issues. Freud would have had a field-day with Obnoxious Orange.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.