Comic Strip of the Day Editorial cartooning

CSotD: Schadenfreudean Slips

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-??) appears to have voted illegally, a particular problem for someone in a political party that keeps screaming about voter fraud.

But it’s not his only problem, or even the main one: While there is no residency requirement for US Senators, Alabama law requires the governor to have lived in the state for seven years. The opponent he beat in the Republican Primary is claiming Tuberville hasn’t fulfilled that requirement.

It’s a mess, but an amusing one. Tuberville had been living in Florida but then changed his residency to Alabama on August 1, 2018, and qualified for a homestead exemption on his taxes. But then he and his wife voted in Florida the following November. Whoops.

If he didn’t legally move to Alabama, he’s not eligible to run for governor, and could face charges for misstating the facts in establishing his campaign. But if he did change residence, he could face charges of illegal voting.

He also may have violated the rules by using public funds to travel to Florida, if it is only a vacation home and not his primary residence.

I don’t have a dog in this fight, but as I was moving from Maine to New Hampshire in 2008, I cast an absentee ballot in Maine, because I knew the issues there but would be a newcomer in New Hampshire on Election Day.

However, I was going to still be in the probationary phase of my new job, living in a rental on a six-month lease and driving with a Maine driver’s license in a car with Maine plates. I was not yet a New Hampshire resident.

Tuberville not only spent a lot of time back in Florida, but maintained a Florida driver’s license until 2023. He’s likely to overcome the residency issue in terms of the governor’s race — he has tax records backing up 2019 residency — but the voting issue should make the upcoming election campaign a lot of fun.

Meanwhile, Congressman Randy Fine (R-FL) is having conniptions over on Xitter because the former resident of his apartment apparently didn’t let the board of elections know she’d moved, and they sent her a ballot there.

“All anyone would need to do is fill it out, sign it, and send it back,” Fine says, which is true.

And if he did, he might get to share a jail cell with Tommy Tuberville, given that he’d have been committing voter fraud.

A dangerous game: The GOP is already squawking about the California primaries, apparently intent on touching off another futile recounting of paper ballots.

There’s an old piece of advice that says if you tell the truth, it spares you the issue of having to remember what you said, and it’s related to the issue of the boy who falsely cried “Wolf!” so often that nobody believed him when the wolf actually appeared.

Telnaes applies this to Dear Leader’s recent physical, because the Trump White House has become such a flowing river of disinformation that when they announce that the president is in perfect health, there is a strong assumption that he has, as she puts it, one foot in the grave.

It doesn’t bolster his credibility that he keeps falling asleep in meetings, whether that is a serious sign of health problems and possible sunsetting or simply the natural result of staying up at night sending out unhinged social media messages.

Credibility seems to be an ongoing issue, not only for Dear Leader but throughout his administration. Stephen Miller launched into a tirade on “Food Stamps,” by which he meant the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, actual food stamps having been phased out nearly 20 years ago.

The way most welfare works in most states and most places is we take your word for it. … If you say your kids are hungry, you are going to get food stamps. … We don’t check, as a country, if you even have kids. You will just start getting the checks.

Pushback was fast, with both workers and recipients enumerating the hoops people must jump through in order to qualify for SNAP benefits, a process of bureaucratic documentation that is said to keep many people from being able to complete the application.

Juxtaposition of the Day

Trump’s nomination of Bill Pulte, a homebuilder who has been director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and the chairman of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for about a year, as Director of National Intelligence hit a wall nearly as soon as it was announced.

Cartoonists were not the only ones to cite his lack of qualifications for the post (beyond hitman), and resistance came from both sides of the aisle, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio declining to endorse him and Mitch McConnell delivering a blistering opinion:

Very few Senate-confirmable positions come with statutory eligibility requirements. There are good reasons why the Director of National Intelligence is one of them. Anyone performing this role of such immense public trust must have the extensive national security experience required by statute, and no nominee who falls short of this requirement will earn my vote.

In response to this bipartisan rejection, Trump announced that Pulte would only be “acting director,” with the explanation that Pulte wouldn’t actually want the job to be permanent.

Sure, Don.

And now the sports: The World Cup is about to kick off, but there are still seats available, since the scalpers seem more enthusiastic about the games than the fans are.

One issue, Amorim suggests, is that foreign fans are scared to come here because they’re heard horror stories of tourists being stopped, jailed and sent back by ICE and Customs. It’s enough of a problem that the Committee to Protect Journalists put out a guide for reporters being sent to cover the games to help them avoid being waylaid.

Some games are being played in Canada or Mexico, which helps avoid ICE issues, but doesn’t save fans from the hassles of dealing with FIFA itself, which has some serious organizational issues. At one point, they accidentally gave out free tickets and had to claw them back.

Things are bad enough that Fortune is offering advice that must surely be too late.

That’s the way the ball bounces.

Mike Peterson has posted his "Comic Strip of the Day" column every day since 2010. His opinions are his own, but we welcome comments either agreeing or in opposition.

Previous Post
100 Years Ago: E&P Directory of Syndicated Comic Art 1926
Next Post
A Fourth Estate Update

Comments 10

  1. The Fortune link is pay-walled.

    1. Try it again. When I first went there this morning, I had to decline a few requests to subscribe, after which they let me in.

      1. I had that same experience. Finally, I got in. BUT! When I refreshed the page, the pay wall came back. (But fortunately, not before I was able to do a text grab of the article)

      2. A technique I use to get around pay walls much of the time, maybe even most of the time, but certainly not all the time:

        When the pay wall presents itself, do the following as fast as fast as your dexterity will allow:

        1. Use the mouse to refresh the page
        2. Ctrl-A
        3. Ctrl-C.

        Try to do this before the pay wall presents itself again. Speed is the key.

        Go to Notepad (or its equivalent in the Mac world) and Ctrl-V.

        You may get what appears to be a single paragraph pages long, but you can often figure out where the paragraphs were. Insert carriage returns (Enter key) where paragraph breaks are evident. Same with ads – believe it or not, these articles behind pay walls also have ads – figure out where they are and delete them off (or put them at the end if it’s not clear whether they are an ad or part of the article).

        Again, this works for many, if not most pay wall articles.

        The most notable exception to this is the New York Times, which seems to present the cut-off article even before the pay wall appears. Not sure how they do it, but I have never been able to break an NYT pay wall.

        (And for what it’s worth, even “gift” NYT articles, apparently, there is an expiration dates for “gift” articles: If you try to access a “gift” article that a year or more old, the pay wall will inform you of the expiration of the “gift.” I say a year or so, but I don’t really know the length of time before “gift” articles expire)

        Hope this helps.

  2. A technique I use to get around pay walls much of the time, maybe even most of the time, but certainly not all the time:

    When the pay wall presents itself, do the following as fast as fast as your dexterity will allow:

    1. Use the mouse to refresh the page
    2. Move the mouse to the article
    3. Ctrl-A
    4. Ctrl-C.

    Try to do this before the pay wall presents itself again. Speed is of the essence.

    Go to Notepad (or its equivalent in the Mac world) and Ctrl-V.

    You may get what appears to be a single paragraph pages long, but you can often figure out where the paragraphs were. Insert carriage returns (Enter key) where paragraph breaks are evident. Same with ads – believe it or not, these articles behind pay walls also have ads – figure out where they are and delete them off (or put them at the end if it’s not clear whether they are an ad or part of the article).

    Again, this works for many, if not most pay wall articles.

    The most notable exception to this is the New York Times, which seems to present the cut-off article even before the pay wall appears. Not sure how they do it, but I have never been able to break an NYT pay wall.

    (And for what it’s worth, even “gift” NYT articles, apparently, there are expiration dates for “gift” articles: If you try to access a “gift” article that a year or more old, the pay wall will inform you of the expiration of the “gift.” I say a year or so, but I don’t really know the length of time before “gift” articles expire)

    Hope this helps.

  3. Can you explain the use of “they’re” in the second paragraph of the World Cup section above? Is there a new grammatic rule for that use? I read that segment without the contraction as “because they have heard horror stories” but the contraction you use is for “they are”.

    Thanks for the explanation.

  4. GKrone, I think it’s a typo for “they’ve.”

    1. It was inserted as a pedant trap.

      1. I escaped, your click-bait wasn’t tasty enough.

  5. Of course it’s a typo for “they’ve.” Why even bring it up? Although Mike answers that.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.