Comic Strip of the Day

CSotD: 10 Years After

It seems like a good time to note the 10 year anniversary of our invasion of Iraq. These cartoons are from my presentation to high schools, back in those days, and so were often printed directly onto transparencies for overheads, making them quite lo-res. 

They also were often copied without dates, since they were being used as contemporaneous commentary at the time and only filed away because I'm a packrat. 

The messages still come through, however. I've tried to put them in rough chronological, or, failing that, some contextual, order.

 

Ovaloffice
In retrospect, Stephff's cartoon from the Bangkok Post becomes less enigmatic and more chillingly prophetic. Did Bush arrive in the Oval Office with some unresolved business to tackle?

What has changed, in my interpretation at least, is the idea that Bush didn't know he was going to have to deal with Saddam. Not to mention the idea that "necessity" was going to even tangentially figure into what happened.

But, whatever Stephff's intent, whatever Bush's intent, this cartoon was still weirdly prescient.

USTerrAttScreamSchran
On 9/11, while the bulk of American cartoonists were drawing weeping Statues of Liberty, Peter Schrank used a familiar image to comment on world reaction, and it's worth noting that this was the initial reaction, despite some outbursts of celebration in isolated neighborhoods of the Middle East.

Luojie
But never let a good tragedy go unexploited …

LuoJie of the China Daily didn't hesitate to make this call. Not that you'd expect a paper in Beijing to favor the Bush/Cheney strategy, mind you. Incidentally, here's LuoJie's blog. I found it a little obscure, but that's no reason not to give you the link, right?

Herb
Norwegian cartoonist Herb (Herbjørn Skogstad) noted that Bush only attracted one major ally for his attack on the fearsome giant, and he reaches beyond Cervantes to depict Sancho Panza with a tail.

This cartoon seems like more of a slap at Blair than at Bush, but cartoonists everywhere had a field day with Bush's cowboy personna, even those who had probably never heard the expression "all hat and no cattle" or knew that, out west, the biggest cowboy hats seem always to be worn by the folks who were born in New England.

Englehart
However, while the world responded with distrust, the idea that everyone back home, by contrast, fell into lockstep isn't true. For example, Bob Englehart sounded a warning, much, of course, like whispering into a hurricane.

Toles

And Tom Toles commented on the lack of preparedness with which we approached the war, sending in enough troops to knock down the tattered remains of Hussein's army but not enough to then counter the furious response.

Bagley070503
But we weren't scared, our commander-in-chief declared from his foxhole on the banks of the war-torn Potomac River, as Patrick Bagley observed.

DrRummy
When this somewhat haphazard approach of going to war with the army you have instead of the one you should have had was beginning to show its human cost, Toles kicked up a hornets' nest with his take on Donald Rumsfeld's cavalier "shit happens" response to the casualties.

There was a time when siding with the troops was good politics, but in these days of crocodile tears and conservative political correctness, Rumsfeld and the Chiefs of Staff lept to the public-relations attack, weeping loudly over the cartoon, claiming Toles was … yeah … disrespecting the brave troops they had sent out with inadequate arms and protection.

DanzRummy
Jeff Danziger was not about to leave Toles dangling in the wind on this one, and countered with an LBJ reference.

 

Head

Meanwhile, a Jordanian cartoonist whose name, unfortunately, got cut off by the printer pointed out the folly of beheading Saddam, which you may recall was a side-effect of his having been hanged with an ill-adjusted noose.

Folders
In the end, there was nothing much to retrieve from the adventure and, as Clay Bennett noted, no real plan for disentangling ourselves beyond "declare victory and bug out."

Mission
Which, Jim Morin points out, we did, with great success. 

Well, not quite as soon as the declaration was made, but soon after. Just a couple of years after. And with great success.

I would say unparalleled success.

Great, unparalleled, fabulous success.

Please don't audit my tax returns.

 

 

POSTSCRIPT: The Washington Post has put up a slideshow of Ann Telnaes' brilliant Iraq cartoons. I've found the link a little wonky, but, if it doesn't come up right, it's worth playing with: Her work is brilliant. 

Previous Post
Video: Chris Browne shares cartooning tips
Next Post
Interviewed: Tom Batiuk on second volume of The Complete Funky Winkerbean

Comments 9

  1. LouJie’s blog does have some pretty pictures. 🙂

  2. I’ve heard quite a few 10th anniversary stories over the last day or so. Opinions vary, and that is as it is.
    I guess the two things that bother me are the selective perception of fact and the lack of any serious consideration of progress in Iraq. As has been offered so many times, we each have a right to our own opinion, but not to our own facts.
    The comic that suggests that there were no ties between Saddam and Al Qaeda as well as no WMD is simply factually false.
    As a matter of opinion, some folks may think that the ties between Saddam and Al Qaeda were insufficient to justify invading Iraq. Taken alone, I could probably be convinced of that. However, there is a big difference between the factual assertion of “no ties” and a relative opinion about what may or may not be “insufficient ties”.
    The WMD suffers from a similar problem. I have read all of the Kay report and most of the Dulfer report. The Dulfer report in particular provides excruciating detail that indicates that Iraq did have WMD programs and materials that were of concern. The worst stuff was shuffled over the border in to Syria before we invaded. The problem was that we could not continue to search where the evidence was leading; not that there was a lack of evidence.
    [Where did the chemical weapons that Syria has been using against civilians recently come from? They never had a chemical weapons program.]
    On that last note, Iraq today is in a much better position than it was before we invaded. They have a functioning democratic process. It may not be the best democracy on the face of the planet, but they at least have a chance to build it into something worth having. They also have a functioning economy that seems to be growing amidst their other troubles.
    Of course, being better than Iraq in 2003 is not exactly a hard thing to do.
    Regards,
    Dann

  3. There was a letter to the editor in the local paper today decrying the sorry condition of a flag shown in a recent picture. “How disrespectful!” etc, etc. But the original point of the picture was that this person had hung the flag out when we invaded Iraq. And had planned to take it down when the war ended.

  4. Mary, I’m old enough to remember when the flag was not flown as part of advertising, when it was not stuck on car antennas to be torn and encrusted with dirt, when it was taken down in the rain and at night, when it was treated with respect. And it stood for all of us, not just the politically correct jingoists. Sad times we live in.
    And Dann, there’s a good chance that the ideologically driven version of the story will prevail and will be in the history books, at least in Texas and Louisiana, alongside the cavemen on dinosaurs and the war that was not fought over slavery.
    But, honestly, I think the people who claim to support the troops would do better to stop trying to justify the war and spend more time persuading their fellow travelers to spend more money on the poor kids who are coming home so badly damaged.
    If Hussein was, in fact, in league with al Qaeda, against all information except that provided by Curveball and his neocon handlers, well, that’s fine. And 9/11 was an inside job and I can cite websites to prove that, too.
    Meanwhile, the selfish SOBs who refuse to spend a dime on anyone but themselves have thrown away a generation and are now nickel-and-diming their treatment.
    That’s the war you should be concentrating on winning.

  5. I agree that we need to take care of the vets coming home. My little brother is still over there as are his friends.

  6. Dann, you’re so wrong it sets some sort of record. For example, Syria long had an active chemical weapons program. I guess you’re useful for measuring what the Fox-bubble is saying but that’s about it. Basically the CIA said there were no WMDs and the existing programs basically existed only on paper. The ties between al Qaeda and Hussein are as reliable as reports of unicorns in New York city. But hey, if Fox told you there were unicorns you’d believe that too.

  7. Actually, I think the person with the battered flag was not exactly showing SUPPORT for the war. I’ll bet they figured it wouldn’t be up that long. Years ago (before Iraq) Dick Cavett had a supposed historical line: “Farewell my dear,I’m off to the Thirty Years’ War.” Iraq has been sort of like that.
    Amen to some actual support. I’m friends with a couple of guys in the Honor Guard for the military funerals at Western Reserve National Cemetery, (one from Nam, one from Korea) and they are both appalled by the suicides they are burying.

  8. Thanks, Mike. But when the unicorn card gets played, I figure it’s time to go fishing or something.
    *chuckle*
    B/R,
    Dann

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.