Comic Strip of the Day

CSotD: Mysteries of the Seven Seas

Edison
The Brilliant Mind of Edison Lee on the gap between sustainability and marketing.

When I was first married and back at college finishing up my degree — my grandfather having pointed out that I would waste less time doing that than I would waste in the future explaining why I hadn't — we rented a house next door to Howard Johnson's. 

HoJosThe humor in the picture derives from the idea that, being vegetarian that year, HoJo's All-You-Can-Eat promos offered little we could cash in on, but I remember marveling at the time that such a large chain of restaurants could make such an offer, not of chicken, since I figured you could just raise more chickens, but of fish and clam strips, which relied on the oceans.

The difference between 21 and 63 being that I have since learned that the adage, "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is," has much wider and looser applications.

If, for instance, you wonder how big the oceans must be to sustain all that bargain-priced fish, well, the answer is "bigger than they actually are."

Last week, in talking about the dubious DNA meat scandals, I noted this NPR report on problems with the system of rating seafood by sustainability, and also offered this song about the personal impact on the Maritimes of the closing down of the Atlantic cod industry due to massive overfishing on the Grand Banks.

I still get up before the day breaks
I still walk down to the shore
I watch the sun rise from the eastern ocean
But I don't sail to meet it anymore.

How could they have let this happen?
We saw it coming years ago
The greedy ships kept getting bigger and bigger
And the sonar told them where to go

 

So the other day, I went by the co-op to pick up some curry paste and I walked past the fish counter to see if there was anything cheap I might add to the shrimp I already had, but there wasn't, and, in fact, the prices seemed higher than usual.

And certainly higher than at the for-profit stores in town, which made me think about the intersection of responsibility and economics. The co-op is a pretty big place with generally competitive prices, like a Whole Foods store except it walks the walk, which is to say, it's nothing at all like Whole Foods.

Such a gap in price suggests a reason, and probably one I can't afford to think about too much.

All this talk of sustainability is good and necessary, but when I go to the farmer's market and see that, among the candles and beads and suchlike irrelevant groovy frippery, are five-dollar-a-dozen eggs and carrots priced to match, I don't feel included in the social movement.

And yet, as much as that airy elitism repels me, I'm still sincerely conflicted when it comes to things like fish and coffee, where the personal responsibility issues are genuine but my wallet also has some matters of sustainability to contend with.

Now, those prices in the picture — $1.69 for all-you-can-eat chicken and $1.49 for all-you-can-eat fish — need to be viewed in context: The minimum wage was $1.60 an hour. But an all-you-can-eat sit-down dinner, with sides of potatoes and slaw, for the current minimum wage of $7.25, would still be one helluva bargain.

Back then, the notion that people with full-time jobs should be able to live on their earnings was not particularly controversial, mind you.

It's also worth noting that HoJo's required you to clean your plate before you got a refill, and that refill would include more potatoes and cole slaw in addition to the fish or chicken. Home cooking, indeed, complete with a grumpy mom enforcing the rules!

And more than that has changed: The square thing that Edison is being offered for a dollar is probably ersatz minced preformed extruded fish product rather than an actual fillet of an identifiable deceased animal.

Nor is it the quarter-inch-thick slice of fish with thin, crispy breading that was served back in them thar days. Most "fish sticks" and "fish fillets" today seem to be more or less deep-fried fish-flavored wheat goo.

Take heart, little fellow: No fish were harmed in the making of this sandwich! Consider it a blow in favor of sustainability.

So, do you want the damn thing or not?

And now, here with an opposing viewpoint (and nutritional information):

 

Previous Post
Watch this: Iron Man 3 trailer released
Next Post
Scott Stantis talks web comics

Comments 6

  1. I just have to tell you that I love this blog!

  2. Buying fish from sustainable fisheries with low heavy metal content seems to fall into the same category as other ethical foods. I’ve become more and more attracted to the idea of buying ethical foods. Organic foods and aren’t really my cup o’ tea. I’m still unconvinced that the difference between organic and non-organic necessitates the markup. Seems more like voodoo than anything else. Natural foods, to me, are more to my liking: It removes the crap from the food processing…process.
    However, I’ve grown to liking humane foods. Free-range eggs and chicken and grass-fed beef. I feel far more relieved supporting organizations that aren’t abusing their animals and turning their farms into Kafka-like hellscapes.
    To that extent, I’d probably prefer getting fish that were ethical as well. However, I’ve only recently decided to follow this path and haven’t purchased fish since I started yet.

  3. “How does a square fish swim?” – punch line of an ancient commercial for Long John Silver’s

  4. We battle with the conflicts here. But without the fabulous Co-op. It’s either Whole Foods or Stop & Shop or drive an hour. And I’m not sure that the driving is offset enough by what we can purchase of humane foods.

  5. I’d forgotten that A&J strip, but, yeah, fish-scented fried dough.
    And my frustration — aside from my sympathy for the fisherfolk of the Rock and Nova Scotia — is that the alternative of farming SHOULD work but is so fraught with environmental disasters and malfunction that it just adds more problems.
    Between floods lifting the Asian carp out of their tanks and dropping them into the Mississippi and floods lifting the pig waste out of the lagoons and dumping it down the entire Chesapeake Bay biosystem, “improving” the feed supply has been one screw up after another — but we can’t have regulation, can we?
    And the bottom line remains that people have to eat and we’ve rigged the system so that all they can afford is fish-scented, deep-fried wheat goo, despite the fact that better, more humane, more sustainable, more justifiable food is possible.
    (But, Lynne, you can compliment the blog any time you like. Good vibes need to be sustainable, too.)

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.