Comic Strip of the Day Comic Strips Editorial cartooning

CSotD: The Golden Spider’s Touch

I like Chilton’s art (which comes from the New Cartoonist), but both the subject matter and the setting are a reminder that the Whole World Is Watching, and it isn’t cheering us on.

There are worse things to export than Disney films, but this is still an indication of how much our culture, such as it is, is not confined to our own shores.

That’s nothing new: Back in the ’80s, Egypt was running Dallas on TV in rural community centers because they needed to get rural farmers to watch the less enthralling programs about growing tomatoes in the brackish water of the Nile, but the result was youngsters flocking to Cairo in search of fancy cars and good living, and winding up in corrugated tin sheds among the other poor.

It’s a two-way street: We adapted All in the Family, Sanford & Son and the Office from British sitcoms, toning them down (or screwing them up, depending on your POV) for American audiences.

Another British cartoonist bases a gag on a Russian classic, showing how it measures up against an American book that should be classified as fiction and which is embarrassing for anyone outside the NYC metro area to have even heard of.

Adams suggests it has more twists and turns and is harder to get through, which I would attribute to the fact that Tolstoy knew where he was headed while that other author is making it up as he goes along.

Like the UK and Australia, New Zealand is going through budget time, which has cut down my use of their cartoons, since they are, obviously, very local in content. But Emmerson reminds us of the éminence grise that lingers over global economy and politics. While perhaps we should be happy to not be the only ones that have to deal with it, it is, after all, our fault that anyone must.

Osa Johnson, world explorer and filmmaker, said elephant meat is hard to eat because it expands the more you chew it. I don’t know if that’s true of real elephants, but it seems true of this one, and by the time we figured it out, we could neither swallow it nor spit it out.

Juxtaposition of the Day

The Democratic National Committee released what was a rough draft of their post-2024 analysis, and they’ve gotten flak over its unfinished, inexact conclusions.

Lincoln warned against the risks of changing horses in mid-stream, but he was talking about between two elections, not smack in the middle of one, and Ramirez is correct that the explanation of what happened would fit on the head of a (campaign) pin.

Meanwhile, the donkey in Weyant’s cartoon hopes it isn’t hereditary, but it’s a little late for that, given that it appears to have started back when the party decided nobody should elbow Hilary Clinton out of the way, sparing itself the agony of a primary in which the party’s voters could choose their prefered candidate, then followed up with Biden, who should have been a one-and-done but declined to step aside until the last minute.

People complain that the DNC’s report is incomplete and doesn’t come to any actual conclusion but that seems to sum up the 2024 campaign perfectly.

I’d remind everyone that, back in 2012, Bobby Jindal summed up the GOP’s defeat to Obama by saying they need to  “stop being the stupid party.”

We’ve got to make sure that we are not the party of big business, big banks, big Wall Street bailouts, big corporate loopholes, big anything. We cannot be, we must not be, the party that simply protects the rich so they get to keep their toys.

Near as I can tell, the only result of his analysis was that the party recommitted itself to doing precisely what he warned against and it appears to have worked out for them.

Nobody has seen Bobby Jindal since but I assume they left his report and kept the cannoli.

And that’s how we got to this

Juxtaposition of the Day #2

Both cartoonists present a world in which young people have nothing to look forward to. Katauskas notes the rotten example set by the president, while Trudeau mourns a world with no opportunities. I’m inclined to agree in general but to resist taking an apocalyptic view of things.

I often refer to my grandfather, who typified the American Dream, beginning by going down into the mine with a dinner pail and eventually going up to the executive suite with a briefcase. But he once observed that he did so at a time when the pie had not yet been cut up and it was still possible to get a slice for yourself.

King Vidor’s classic silent film, The Crowd, begins with the birth of John Sims, whose proud father declares that his boy will grow up to be president. There then follows one of the most famous scenes in movie history, showing how this idealistic, patriotic prophecy turns out:

It’s a brilliant movie, but it never gets any more encouraging than that.

In Doonesbury, Sam learns not to listen to the alums because it’s far too discouraging. But, then again, in the Graduate, Ben found the advice of his parents’ generation depressing, so what’s new?

I’ve got five granddaughters, one still in high school, one in college and three who decided college was too expensive and found jobs that didn’t require it.

Their youth and energy make me nostalgic. They’re living normal, quiet lives, but they’re active and involved. Not everyone in Gen Z makes headlines, but they keep their ears to the ground.

For instance, young activists are camped outside Delaney Hall, like a combination of Freedom Summer and the Democratic Convention. But even average Gen Z Minnesotans turned out in the crisis there.

As for the chance to be president, I think they’d rather topple the golden statue than pose for one. And Bramhall isn’t kidding: Dear Leader is gilding statues in DC and wants to slap white paint on the granite face of the Executive Office Building.

The President is a role model. Nobody said he has to be a positive one.

Mike Peterson has posted his "Comic Strip of the Day" column every day since 2010. His opinions are his own, but we welcome comments either agreeing or in opposition.

Previous Post
Of Dahl & Seuss & Quentin Blake, Of Illustration Kings (& Queens)
Next Post
Lazin’ On a Sunday Afternoon

Comments 21

  1. An accurate 2024 autopsy would go something like this: in 2020, Biden famously promised donors “nothing will fundamentally change” under a Biden presidency. He made good on that promise, nothing fundamentally changed, and we ended up right back in the same place.

    1. Same place? No, it’s only gotten worse.

      1. Well, if the same place is on a downhill slope, that’s what happens.

  2. If Biden had just stuck to being a one-termer, like he’d talked about originally, we might’ve had ample opportunity to watch Kamala Harris (or whoever won the primary) wipe the floor with Trump in debate.

    Unfortunately, there still would’ve been underestimation of how deeply misogynistic the American electorate is at heart; not much to be done about that, unfortunately.

    1. Disagree. I don’t think it’s misogyny or racism. I followed Harris when she began running before she was Biden’s VP choice, and while she is attractive and personable, she was just a lousy campaigner. She was also a bad VP choice, because the wise tradition is a charismatic candidate at the top, like JFK or Obama, and a well-established tough deal-maker in the VP slot, like LBJ, Gore or Biden. Harris is a nice person, but she didn’t have the connections to be a good VP. And she’d already proven she wasn’t a good campaigner.

      I think voters would accept a solid, tough woman, but, of course, the opposition poisoned the well for Hilary and Pelosi and Warren with mockery ahead of time. They’re clever — gotta give them that.

      1. The problem is any solid, tough woman that would make it that far, even in 2026, would be branded as “shrill” or “emotional”, and even the supposedly “friendly” press would waste no time picking apart her weight, parenting style, shoes, the way she laughs, what kind of makeup she wears (or doesn’t), etc. She would be held to a standard that no male politician ever gets held to, and answer questions that no male politician ever has to answer—and I know this because every woman who’s ever had an even *slightly* higher level position at pretty much any job has experienced the same, and we all know that in the case of a president it will be a million times worse.

        I don’t know why every other first-world country has been able to cross that barrier but ours hasn’t—I have a theory that Evangelicalism has something to do with it.

        I can see where Harris might’ve been a “bad campaigner” (I don’t know what makes a good one to be honest—“good campaigners” just seem fake to me and I had seen enough of her in the Senate to be tell that she knew her stuff.) But, unfortunately, I don’t think our electorate as it exists now has it in them to elect even a woman without prior baggage. I wish it weren’t so, but after two Trump terms, I’ve lost my faith in the lot of them.

      2. Where did the strong, savvy senator persona disappear to when Kamala became VP??? Her word salads and cackle didn’t help either. Dems made a huge mistake by appointing her and not conducting an abbreviated primary of some sort. There’s no doubt a sharp, charismatic woman could easily be elected today.

      3. American men will never accept a woman — no matter how tough, smart, strong, etc. — as Commander-in-Chief.

    2. We did see Kamala wipe the floor with Trump in a debate.

  3. Abby, I agree. Misogyny and racism are still a major part of the American psyche. Thank you for still having the energy to keep saying it. I am losing mine.

  4. It always surprises me that there are more women than men voters in the United States. And if the women would just get together there would be a woman president. Remember, women got the vote without having the vote! They convinced Congress to write an amendment, passed it, the president signed it, it went to the States who ratified it – all without any female votes. They can be a force to be reckoned with.

    1. All you gotta do is listen to any female Trump supporter for five minutes to figure that one out.

      1. The fact that there are any female Trump supporters still amazes me.

  5. Michelle Obama said it all. Americans who say they support a female candidate are full of it.

    1. Here’s the “sh…” that was omitted from your comment. 🙂

  6. Good job proving my point, Joe.

    Any way a woman laughs is an issue if it’s not “photogenic” somehow if she’s in public enough, never mind that it’s an issue that has probably the least effect on how she’d actually govern. Would a “cackle” bother you coming from a male candidate (assuming the right wing yappers mentioned it all)?

    I’ll concede that she wasn’t front and center much as VP, and, again, if it were up to me Biden would’ve stuck to one term and then started making her more visible. (It actually used to be normal for the VP to have less to do, despite the current regime trying to make JD Vance happen right now.) But there was already plenty of footage of her in Senate hearings and of her as governor to look back on, and “word salad” it was not—unless that’s what a woman saying complicated things sounds like to you, or that’s what Hannity told you to think. Personally, I think the electorate and the press has the collective memory of a goldfish, so none of her past career had any impact (although I think that, too, might’ve been different in the case of a man.)

    In the end, the way I see it, a greedy, stupid, unqualified man who I wouldn’t trust to water my plants was elected over a woman—who, whatever flaws she might’ve had, could speak like someone with more than a fifth grade vocabulary and was capable of holding more than one thought in her head—TWICE. And that tells me all I need to know about the state of things.

    1. thank you. im tired of the “cackle” crap from sexist men. your reply was spot on.

  7. ***edited to add that she was AG of Calif, not governor

  8. I am not a big fan of Michael Ramirez (great drawings and caricatures, but to right leaning for my tastes), but boy, does he nail the obvious point with his take on the B.S. autopsy done by the Democratic Party. The ONLY reason we have Trump is squarely because of Biden, and instead of blaming Biden for everything, Trump should be kissing his scrawny butt.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.