Comic Books Comic History International

(Comic) History Gone Awry

John Freeman at downthetubes reviews a new history book of British comics – it comes with a warning.

The rise of AI has led to some bilge-filled books in recent years times, and now it’s becoming the bane of British comic fans interested in exploring the history of our medium.

A case in point is the recently released, independently published The Great British Comic Riot from Axon Press, written by “Inky Fingers”, which has a factual error on almost every page, not only assigning comics of yesteryear to the wrong publisher, but making up the names of strips they featured, too.

Worse still, the “author” cites a mix of both fictitious and genuine sources, the latter including Pat Mills and downthetubes, in an attempt to bring some legitimacy to its inaccurate outpourings of bilious inanity.

John Freeman exposes errors in new comics history book

Strangely the creator of the “independently published” book couldn’t be bothered to dig up a public domain comic image for the book’s cover and instead has a picture of a girl blowing bubbles.

John concludes his review with, “Caveat emptor, buyer beware! That is, don’t buy it!

Elsewhere British cartoonist Lew Stringer bought the book:

As you know, I’ve been interested in the history of comics since I was a child, so whenever there’s a new book published on the subject I’ll grab it. Therefore I had no hesitation in buying The Great British Comic Riot, a softback allegedly full of info about UK comics of the 1980s. I knew it was Print On Demand, and only available through Amazon, so I wasn’t expecting a definitive work. Sadly, it even fell far short of that!

I won’t sugar coat this. It’s the most inaccurate book about comics I’ve ever read. 

This reminds me of the controversy surrounding the publication of Maurice Horn’s The World Encyclopedia of Comics. The 1976 release of that book was both celebrated and castigated. The book brought world-wide attention to the comics media but comics scholars complained that there were a thousand errors in its 800 pages. The Comics Buyer’s Guide spent a couple issues reporting on hundreds of the mistakes.

The flaws were brushed off by some because it was a first of its kind volume and could serve as a starting point for researchers. Two years later we got Crawford’s Encyclopedia of Comic Books (1978) which, again, was a comic history book filled with inaccuracies. Some easily checked as it was relatively recent history.

For example on page 343 Crawford tells this Marvelmaniac that:

[Captain America] was discontinued in 1950 as superhero fantasy gave way to Marvel’s new trend of love and romance titles. But April 1968 marked the dramatic comeback of Captain America by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby.

As we all know Cap was revived in 1953 for a short run and then again in 1964 in the early part of “The Marvel Age of Comics” (Avengers #4). Before that year was over the character had his own series running in Tales of Suspense. April 1968 was the cover date of when Captain America got his own self titled comic book (#100, continuing the Tales of Suspense numbering) in that time frame’s explosion of Marvel’s Silver Age titles.

Previous Post
A List: “11 of the Most Famous Political Cartoons in US History” (Our Mileage Varies)
Next Post
CSotD: Meanwhile, Back on the Battlefield

Comments 7

  1. I did not know that about “The World Encyclopedia of Comics”. My local Half-Price Books had a copy, but I didn’t get it then…

  2. Using AI may make it easier to collate garbage into book form, but it is just a tool, and the real problem are the unethical authors and publishers, who have been producing similar junk long before computers were able to do it for them. Over 25 years ago I ordered a promising looking reference work on Tolkien’s books, but quickly discovered that it was utterly worthless. The errors were not limited to minor factual mistakes, but also included several instances of wholesale fabrications. It was so bad that the publisher withdrew the book and offered a refund (which I gladly accepted). At the time they claimed that the author was going to correct the mistakes and release a revised edition, but that never happened. I would never buy anything by that author ever again.

  3. The other day, I wanted to see if anyone else online had identified the random cloven-hoofed leg under the Capucian monkey in the final panel of last week’s SUPERMAN UNLIMITED which featured the new origin of Beppo the Super (Macaque) Monkey, and in that final panel seemed to foreshadow a new set of Legion of Super-Pets featuring seven (eight?) specific animals gathered around the newly de-aged Jon Kent as he petted them (for the record, a mandrill, a gorilla, an owl, a rabbit, a mouse, a house cat, a snake, a Capucian monkey, and the weirdly disconnected brown leg of some hooved animal–deer? boar? buffalo? gazelle? goat?, moose?–who knows?) Google A.I. confidently described a panel NOT anywhere in the issue in which Jon and Krypto have a heart-to-heart discussion with Beppo! I then asked Mr. Google A.I. why it did this, and it explained that because they could find no details about said panel, they deduced and extrapolated the panel from the story’s plot and what was shown on the cover!! A.I., when unable to make logical statements based on its gathered knowledge, fulfills its algorithm to please the questioner by ALWAYS giving a confident answer EVEN WHEN THEY DON’T KNOW THE CORRECT ANSWER! How do I know this? Google A.I. told me, explaining why it had given me a different wildly incorrect answer! So Google A.I. is at least an honest liar who will admit its lies–if that’s any consolation.

  4. The current growth area in AI-based publishing (‘growth’ as in tumour) is biographies: minimal pagination, large print and garbage from end to end, occasionally featuring cover photos of another person entirely.

    1. According to Amazon, ‘Inky Fingers’ is actually Anthony Smales, whose other credits seem primarily aimed at the Spanish-speaking market.

  5. Casual readers don’t care and nerds’ opinions don’t count. ‘Twas ever thus in popular culture. Yet, somehow, we manage to carry on. Perhaps history will be kinder to us. We believe that truth will out; we’re just not sure it’ll happen during our lifetime.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.