Comic Strip of the Day Editorial cartooning

CSotD: We’re Not Yet Warm And Dead

There is an expression within the Cold Water Rescue community, “They’re not dead until they’re warm and dead.” It comes from having pulled people out of icy water with no discernible signs of life, only to find that they can be revived by appropriate action as they warm up. Only when they are warm and yet still show no vital signs are they pronounced dead.

At the moment, there is plenty over which to despair in this country, but Matson notes an interesting development, which is the growing rumors of Republican lawmakers quietly deciding not to run for reelection in the midterms.

Johnson would be a fool to ignore the rumblings, because we’ve had special elections that strongly indicated disaster ahead for the GOP. If the midterms are indeed headed for the falls, losing incumbents would add to the challenge of holding onto their slim-but-critical majority.

Johnson is not the most charismatic and powerful Speaker of the House in history, while over in the Senate, John Thune appears to be operating more on party loyalty than on personal power. This is not Lyndon Johnson stopping by to issue gentle, folksy threats but, in both houses, appeals to be one of the guys.

However, you can’t primary someone who isn’t running.

Donald Trump has taken over the Republican Party and imposed unity and loyalty from the heights of the executive branch, making the appeal of the GOP more a function of marketing than of policy. This use of Hollywood appeal in place of political stances worked for Ronald Reagan because, in addition to his movie-star fame, he had a significant background both leading the Screen Actors Guild and as governor of California.

Reagan could appeal to those who want fame and folksiness, while also satisfying those who wanted a rigid brand of old-school conservatism.

But Telnaes attributes Trump’s appeal entirely to marketing, and notes that his trip to Pennsylvania, which was supposed to be a revival of his mass appearances, went significantly off-track as he mocked the idea that “affordability” matters.

Goris suggests that even the most loyal of MAGA types will have to strain to accept the notion that affordability is a “hoax,” hoax being Trump’s catch-all term for anything that fails to resonate with his narrative.

We’ve come a long way since Trump’s first inauguration, in which he declared a record crowd despite obvious evidence to the contrary, and his absurd boasting was explained by Kellyanne Conway as an “alternative fact.”

Loyalists then declared that enormous throngs had gathered after the pictures were taken showing a small crowd.

There’s no such effort to explain the yawning chasms between fact and fiction anymore, and Karoline Leavitt is perfectly comfortable claiming on Newsmax that China bought no soybeans under Biden despite figures showing sales in excess of what is currently being sold there. As this analysis concluded:

Leavitt is either so profoundly uninformed on this subject that she didn’t know her claim could be easily disproven, or she just liked the sound of her lie and didn’t expect, or receive, any pushback from the Newsmax hosts conducting the interview.

They’re not even trying anymore, instead, counting on the dogged loyalty of the MAGA crowd, which is far from an electoral majority.

The average consumers, Mike Smith insists, will only be distracted by big, macho moves so long, given that they still have to put food on their tables, heat their homes and dress their children.

The advantage Trump retains is having loyalist networks like Fox, Newsmax and OAN to praise large gestures like seizing foreign ships while downplaying, and sometimes ignoring, day to day factors that impact average voters.

Kristi Noem made a fool of herself in front of a Congressional committee, in which she said no American veterans had been deported, only to be immediately confronted with two cases in which they had. Noem was reduced to spouting a word-salad that offered distractions but no answers.

And that’s not the biggest bump in the road she hit: The moment Brodner marks came when Rep. Dan Goldman got her to agree that people with ongoing cases are here legally and are not in violation of immigration law, which reduced her to irrelevant blather about Joe Biden in place of responsive answers.

Of course, the people who need to see these exchanges never will, because they won’t be shown on loyalist channels. And Trump’s desire to see CNN fall into friendly hands, plus his ongoing friendship with the new leadership at CBS, should remind us that a free press belongs to those who own one.

Or who post independently.

Brodner offers a two-fer, also noting the failure of national Republicans to intimidate Indiana Republicans into approving an insanely revised electoral map designed to deprive Democrats of any possible Congressional seats.

State legislators reported a flurry of threats, bomb scares and other grassroots terrorism, which helped many of them decide to reject the official pressure that came along with it.

Marjorie Taylor Greene and Rand Paul may be signaling a trend in Washington that has already gained a foothold in flyover country: Ignoring orders in favor of providing service. What a concept!

Will the farmers who voted Trump into office see past the three-card-monte game he’s playing now, in which he returns some of their tariff money to help repair the damage done by those tariffs?

As noted before, losing NFL teams still fill their stadiums, and lifelong fans are equally loyal to political parties. Like abused partners everywhere, they’ll find a way to explain why it was their fault and how they know it will never happen again.

Still, there is hope. They don’t all have to change. Each lost sheep who returns to the fold is cause for celebration.

And Now For Something Completely Different

It’s time again for the annual kerfuffle in which people once more forget that TIME Magazine’s “Person of the Year” isn’t always a good person and doesn’t always mark a positive development.

So a tip of the hat to Thor Benson, who observed: I guess it’s fitting that it’s a reimagined, worse version of someone else’s artwork.

Meanwhile, as Mr. Rogers said, we should look for the helpers:

Previous Post
Dan Perkins Before He Was Tom Tomorrow
Next Post
Tjeerd Royaards Wins European Cartoon Award 2025
The European Cartoon Award Feature

Comments 10

  1. Thank you for featuring that excellent cartoon by Scott Stantis.

    As a scientist who once participated in a published review in Nature and a few times in Nature Genetics, I feel honor-bound to point out that the AI-composed article in Scientific Reports was now retracted from that third-tier spinoff of the Nature brand conceived of by its publishers to capture even more of your tax dollars. That is, when scientists choose to publish in a journal, they directly or indirectly pay to do so, in exchange for intangible credibility that can fluctuate in value. (Stunts like that figure tend to drive down said value.) There’s lots more gaming where that comes from, but just an update on that particular incident. Anyhow, citizens as well as scientists are encouraged to point these sort of things out on PubPeer, which has a lot of successful retractions or reasonable doubts raised (and some score-settling) to its credit. https://pubpeer.com/publications/E1A0A9AC672336E92673154575091E

  2. I pick nits, but the stadiums of many losing (and some winning) teams are rarely full, or close to it. While I’m sure the owners of those teams would prefer full stadiums, the money they make from TV contracts and organized gambling is so much that attendance is hardly relevant.

    I am participating in a contest where we pick against the spread of NFL games more or less for fun, and it is run using Vegas spreads that you pick against. I follow the NFL fairly closely but not religiously so, and make my picks each week without analyzing the spreads…just look at them and pick according to my judgment of how the teams are doing, their trends, etc. Takes me five to ten minutes. I am a bit over even for the year, and that puts me in the 95th percentile of the millions participating nationally (and in my group of 300 or so). I would say that, at best, 20% of the participants are doing better than breaking even. sigh

    1. NFL teams have sold 98% of their seats thus far this year. Last year the league finished with 98.3% of capacity.

      The Cleveland Browns, whom I pick on as a hapless team, are sitting at 95.3% capacity with a 3-10 season. I’d be surprised if any team, any play, any opera didn’t have a few people not show up, but most would be thrilled with a 95.3% sales record, especially if they’d established a record of less-than-mediocre achievement.

      https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Articles/2025/11/05/nfl-teams-keep-filling-seats-through-nine-weeks-of-season/

      1. They sell the seats but the attendance listed is much lower than the number of people actually there. Not that the teams much care about that, although they are losing out on parking revenue and concessions revenue. As I said, all of that is a drop in the bucket compared to their main revenue sources. None of this affects my ROI on my Packer “ownership”.

      2. “much higher”, not much lower. Jeesh.

  3. I have a feeling that ship is going to be going down with its captain.

    1. Reminds me of the phrase “ships leaving a sinking rat.”

  4. I don’t like to bring up politics, but when I visit my parents in Indiana this Christmas I’m definitely going to mention how proud I am of their Republican legislature actually doing something right for once.

    My parents are life-long Reagan Republicans, but I know that they’re good people in spite of how they vote. Maybe the open threats on their legislators will help them see things in a clearer light.

    There has to come a point where enough is enough.

    1. One of the R senators who voted “no” announced that he was going to after Trump’s post where he dropped the r-word because the senator’s daughter has Down syndrome. That itself amazed me considering all the guys who’d caved to Trump even after he’d insulted them and their families.

      The outcry against redistricting amongst the ordinary constituents around here was pretty loud as well and, this being a state where it seems a dead cat with a flag pin taped to it can be elected, it was amazing to me that the legislature actually listened.

  5. Maya Angelou: People will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel. This is why both trolling, and actual irrefutable facts, do not win converts. I believe this is a key aspect most anti-Trumpers of any political persuasion fail to internalize. Whatever one’s complaint is with the status quo, supporting Trump and his ilk is not a rational position, it cannot possibly be fact based, but instead based on feelings, fear looming pretty large. Facts did not get them there, facts wil not bring them back. Plus Fox et. al is their “team,” their tribe. Full stadium there!

    This is why citing DT’s business failings, fourth-grade vocabulary, broken promises, gaslighting etc., simply does not matter to them. He makes them feel good; criticism makes them feel bad. (If you’ve ever known anyone whose significant other is unfaithful, you’ve probably also never seen anyone more defensively double down and attack anyone who brings it up…) Find a way to tap into their feelings without pesky facts, then you may have a chance.

Leave a Reply

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.