Comic Strip of the Day Editorial cartooning

CSotD: That Old Familiar Feeling

This isn’t a Juxtaposition of the Day because it’s a Juxtaposition of 23 Years. Bramhall’s is current, Englehart’s ran back when we went into Iraq in 2003 with the same goal of stopping terror.

Both cartoons comment on the foolishness of the effort, but Bramhall focuses on the president who blundered into a hopeless maze, while Englehart was commenting on the dilemma the troops would face. Both make valid points.

And Englehart was right: 4057 Americans and a number of our allies, plus countless Iraqis on both sides and also on neither side died, and that was just in Iraq. Englehart speaks of fighting terrorism in general. We lost 2461 Americans in Afghanistan, and, again, allies and local people also paid the price.

It’s important to point out that Bush proved crowing “Mission Accomplished” doesn’t change things. As Slyngstad suggests, if Trump were a more cautious soul, he might have gone to W for pointers. Indeed, Bush wrote the book.

(I was making memes before they called’em that.)

Deerings’ cartoon came before the Kuwaitis accidentally downed three of our jets, and it’s good that the crews bailed out safely, but at roughly the same time, the Secretary of Greasy Kid Stuff was conducting a bizarre press conference that showed the impact of another blunder, since the hand-picked loyalist reporters he had gathered asked him tough questions like “As you’ve said, there are a large amount of U.S. service members that are in harm’s way right now. What is your prayer for them?”

And although that was a dumb question and a waste of everyone’s time, it turns out we apparently do have a prayer for our troops, since Hegseth had sent out an invitation to a Christian prayer service at the Pentagon that many military members and contractors interpreted as operationally mandatory.

Furthermore, according to Jonathan Larsen, a variety of military members have complained to the Military Religious Freedom Foundation of being told by their officers that the war is the beginning of Armageddon and the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. However, that is a single-source story and should be taken with a grain of salt until it’s independently confirmed.

Still, Hegseth has been noted for promoting religiosity in the past, though he’s also been known to intervene for soldiers accused of war crimes, and his policy of killing men whose boats have been disabled in the Caribbean has been said to violate the rules of war.

Doesn’t matter. In yesterday’s press conference, he announced that the US military will not be impeded by international rules of war:

America, regardless of what so-called international institutions say, is unleashing the most lethal and precise air power campaign in history. B-2s, fighters, drones, missiles, and of course classified effects. All on our terms with maximum authorities. No stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy building exercise, no politically correct wars.

Varvel and Summers are among the 21% of Americans who support our attacks on Iran. Presumably they expect our efforts to be more successful in bringing peace, justice and democracy to Iran than they were in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.

Sipress, in the meantime, isn’t even convinced that we’ll be able to bring peace, justice and democracy to our own country.

Ramirez celebrates the death of Khamenei, though he doesn’t specifically say it will usher in a world of peace, justice and democracy.

Certainly that one man wasn’t operating without support, though Ramirez doesn’t note that the evil witch killed by Dorothy’s house was only the sister of the Wicked Witch of the West. Evil continued without the Wicked Witch of the East.

Chappatte tosses a quick pie at Dear Leader over the whole thing. He’s certainly right about Trump’s egotism and grandiose narcissism, since he didn’t even offer Congress a heads’ up, much less consult them about his plans to plunge the nation into war.

Morland offers a considerably pessimistic view of what Trump hath wrought. He includes a hand grenade, an opened can of worms and a nest of hornets among the things loosed from Pandora’s Box, and, like Chappatte, touches on Dear Leader’s egotistical lack of forethought and restraint.

Anderson points out that Trump’s “America First” policies put Americans in peril, and he could be talking about the individuals who are being called upon to fight this war of choice, or he could be reflecting the likelihood of revenge on America in the form of vengeful terrorism.

As I write, we’ve only lost six Americans, though “only” is not the way their families would phrase it. Dear Leader does, however, seem intent on fighting this war from a safe distance, with bombs and missiles rather than direct engagement.

That’s not quite as safely as he fought the Vietnam War, of course.

There have been many comments about Baron and whether heel spurs can be inherited. Buss goes further and suggests that false claims of heel spurs could certainly become a family tradition. Of course, there’s no draft today, so Baron would have to actively volunteer to end up in the military, which seems unlikely.

I wouldn’t mind a return to the draft, though I didn’t agree during Vietnam. But I took my II-S deferment along with millions of other American college students. It infuriates me to hear Trump described as a “five-time draft dodger,” because a lot of college graduates, like Al Gore, John Kerry and Rocky Bleier, served honorably after school.

Trump’s ignorance of tariffs and trade imbalance mark him as probably one of the slackers who stayed in college strictly for that II-S, but only those who went to places like Parsons were considered dodgers.

Working-class kids, however, were at the mercy of a system in which their families had little influence, while movers and shakers who could have made a difference had sons with II-S deferments. Half my high-school classmates went to Vietnam. Few of my college classmates even knew anybody in the service.

A draft of young men and women without student deferments would focus the minds of American parents.

At least the ones who didn’t know a friendly physician who would diagnose heel spurs.

Mike Peterson has posted his "Comic Strip of the Day" column every day since 2010. His opinions are his own, but we welcome comments either agreeing or in opposition.

Previous Post
Jim McCloskey – From Editorial Cartoons to Caricatures
Next Post
New (to me) Local Comic Strip – Laurel by Brian Nelson

Comments 17

  1. I have an Iranian friend who would probably agree with Varvel and Summers. The Islamic Republic has done so many horrible things that many Iranians welcome anything that might hasten its downfall, no matter where it comes from or what form it takes.

    That said, Trump has signaled that he may be open to an outcome like Venezuela, where the regime stays in place as long as it makes a “deal” with him. Hegseth’s dismissive comments about “democracy” hint at the same thing. I don’t think the Israelis would welcome such an outcome, since they have too many scores to settle with the regime, but I’m not sure they have as much influence over Trump as some seem to think. Trump and Netanyahu are just using each other to further their own interests. Unfortunately, not the best candidates for “liberators” of any country.

    That said, Churchill was a die-hard racist and imperialist who was responsible for the deaths of millions in India, and Stalin was, well, Stalin — but without them, we’d all be dead or speaking German.

    History works in strange ways. Heroes can be villains and villains can be heroes. People can do terrible things for good reasons and good things for terrible reasons. Let’s just hope that somehow it bends towards justice.

    1. Taking into account that back in the 1930’s the Iranians had an elected government that was undermined by the US and Britain, one wonders about how much bending toward justice there is at this point.

      1. Sue, that actually illustrates my point about heroes sometimes being villains and villains sometimes being heroes. Eisenhower, the liberator of Europe and the wise statesman who warned of the military-industrial complex, is the same one who ordered the overthrow of Mossadegh — which led to the Shah, which led to the Islamic Republic.

        If intervention by a U.S. president who is the exact opposite of a wise statesman leads to the end of the Islamic Republic, it will be welcomed by millions of Iranians, regardless of its source. As far as what comes next, that depends not only on what corrupt and self-interested world leaders do but also on what millions of Iranians do.

    2. I’d caution against putting too much weight on the opinions of an ex-pat about his or her former country. Not that their observations are false, but they may not reflect the views of a majority of those who remain.

  2. I suspect that Hegseth will institute a rule limiting how tall recruits can be.

    1. Had a friend in college who got a laugh from Bobby Kennedy before the Indiana primaries by asking him if they were going to raise the max height for the draft. He was the center on our basketball team. Bobby told him not to worry about it. I doubt Baron has to worry either.

  3. Thirteen months into his reign, d*t has done more damage domestically and internationally than I thought could be possible. (The Republicans in Congress would have gone apoplectic if Biden had even mentioned the thought of any of these things.) What crazy action will he do next – start destroying Chinese satellites and begin a war in space? (Maybe I shouldn’t be giving him any more dangerous ideas.)

  4. “Secretary of Greasy Kid Stuff” is cute, but I just call him Hogsh*t

    1. My go-to descriptor is “DUI Hire”.

  5. “Mommas don’t let your babies grow up to be soldiers” I am in favor of any excuse to avoid killing people, even heel spurs.

    1. And then there are those who are more than happy to use other people to do their dirty work for them. And look down on them for doing it.

    1. I had the same question. Of course, I’ve supported MRFF for some years, but their report was not what I would call a “single source”. Like if the LA Times had reported exactly that, would it be called a single source? A more accurate term is needed, unless there is something about MRFF that disqualifies it. I hope they are not being treated in the same category as Dreadful Leader’s “many people say….”

  6. If we’re trying to stop terror, when do we invade the White House?

    1. Any time, and then we get pardoned!

  7. Rather than trying to join Tom Lehrer’s “Folk Song Army”, Phil Ochs would have been well advised to get a red VW Microbus and commit a bit of littering.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.