Comic strips Daily Cartoonist

TDC @ 20: Who Was the Bad Cartoonist?

In early 2008 there was a flash in the pan blog called “The Bad Cartoonist” written by an anonymous cartoonist. The posts contained personally attacks on the art and craft of fellow cartoonists. Most cartoonists were aggrieved more by the author’s anonymity than his criticism. As Matt Davies wrote, “didn’t see anything I haven’t heard before over a beer at AAEC meetings.” The effort to figure out who was behind “Bad Cartoonist” turned out to be my best detective work, but also one of my biggest regrets in reporting for The Daily Cartoonist.

My first attempt to uncover the Bad Cartoonist’s identity was asking him for an interview. I was hoping that the email exchange would yield clues or his emails’ IP address might give me a direction. The resulting article became the central place for cartoonists to discuss his attacks and anonymity. Unfortunately, the interview or emails were unhelpful.

My next attempt was to create a “honeypot” – a web page that looked normal but also logged the IP addresses of visitors in the background. I was hoping to find a match between the IP addresses collected in the honeypot against IP addresses that WordPress saves with each comment. If there was a match, then I’d have the identity of the Bad Cartoonist—provided he had previously left a comment on TDC with his real name/email. This only led to a lot of work without any results.

The third attempt came while I was working late one night. I received a chat request from the Bad Cartoonist. I accepted the chat. As we exchanged messages, I began creating yet another honeypot. I gave the title of the honeypot page “Bad Cartoonist turns out to be…” and added a kitten gif and uploaded it to the server. After a bit of cat and mouse banter, I messaged him and announced I figured out who he was and sent him the link. He took the bait and clicked the link. I now had an IP address that wasn’t obfuscated by a VPN connection.

Archive.org copy of TDC honeypot page (missing kitten gif)

The IP address traced back to a newspaper in Rochester, New York. I messaged Bad Cartoonist that I had tracked him to the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle. He tried to explain it away as if he was outside the office building piggybacking off their Wi-Fi. It wasn’t a believable story as most businesses outside of coffee shops do not allow the public on their networks, and it was around 2 a.m. Rochester time. Bad Cartoonist was likely an employee of the paper.

The staffing page on the Democrat and Chronicle’s website did not list a cartoonist, nor did they publish any editorial cartoonist—staff or freelance on their website. In hindsight, this is where I should have ended the chat leaving him to stew in uncertainty, and me with a very solid clue to chase down. But he was panicking and I was high on adrenaline. Bad Cartoonist messaged me and offered to divulge his identity in exchange for a promise not to disclose it. I can only blame journalism inexperience and the adrenaline for agreeing to the bargain. We had a brief phone call to confirm his identity. That was the last communication I’ve had with him. I was elated that I had figured out who he was, but waking up the next morning I regretted making the promise.

I played “hot and cold” with Nick Anderson for a while, feeding him vague clues. Eventually, all interest in “The Bad Cartoonist” stopped, and so did Bad Cartoonist’s blog posts.

To those who were attacked on “The Bad Cartoonist” blog: while you have (or had) careers that brought both laughter and anger to your readers, provided value to your employers and communities, and supported yourself or families with your art, the Bad Cartoonist washed out. The critic is now in marketing and, based on social media posts, only dabbles in cartooning occasionally — none of it for publication. His lack of success may have been a matter of bad timing, trying to enter the field just as newspaper staff jobs were retracting; or, despite receiving an earlier award for clear opinions and strong artistry on political and social topics, perhaps his quality of work simply wasn’t sustainable.

Two final notes on “The Bad Cartoonist”. The domain has since been taken over by another anonymous cartoonist who goes by the moniker “Bad Cartoonist,” but I do not believe it is the same individual based on theme and drawing style. Secondly, I will honor my word to not divulge the name of Bad Cartoonist, but those who are still curious you may find this article peppered with several clues that haven’t been disclosed before.

Previous Post
CSotD: The Man Who Would Be King
Next Post
Around the Cartooning World

Comments 14

  1. I only know of one cartoonist talented enough to have won an award who later went into marketing and I have a hard time believing it’s him. He didn’t seem the type, but I could be wrong.

    On another note, I just read thru the comments on your original linked article (good times) and this comment from Cam Cardow leapt out at me:

    “That said, it is highly unfair that he doesn’t sign his articles. Someone wrote earlier that we shouldn’t complain because we all hold others up to ridicule everyday in what we do for a living.

    The difference is we all SIGN OUR WORK and are therefore, responsible for what we say.

    But being a chicken sh** by hiding will get you nothing but utter contempt. If they do find out who you are, you’ll be labeled as both a prick and a chickensh**, so you’d be better off with just being the first one.”

    Hoo boy, that gave me a much-needed belly laugh today.

    1. This hits home a little more these days as there are some editorial cartoonists working under a pseudonym or anonymous name. I think syndicated by Cagle.

      1. Yes, Cam!
        …But, alas, no longer.

    2. Hey, Rick – congrats on your recent award!

      1. Thanks! Hope you’re doing well.

  2. Alan, that is amazing detective work (and a little scary!). It’s very cool reading about the process. I was really hoping to find out Whodunnit.

    D.D., thanks for posting a couple of links, because I missed out on the whole thing. Reading these, though, what I walk away with is not a burning desire to know who the guy was, but disappointment that the guy was a worse writer than any of the cartoons he criticized. I mean, there’s certainly room for criticism in comics. But he just comes across as small, mean, and uncreative. Maybe that’s why he chose to remain anonymous.

  3. Your hints may have led me astray, but it’s doubly disappointing that Bad Cartoonist may have been a Locher Award recipient.

  4. I don’t know, “Let the dead bury the dead.” is a kinder philosophy. Marketing hell is punishment enough. As my neighbor says, “Sticking the green end of a pineapple where the sun don’t shine ain’t gonna help anything.”

  5. Geez whoever the “bad Cartoonist” was/is can go jump in a lake. Sounds like a sad little person to me.

  6. Thanks for the trip down memory lane, Alan. For context, I was president of the AAEC at the time and a lot of people were pressuring me to find out who it was. And needless to say, I was very curious myself. It was a fun ride following your clues, but also drove me crazy because I couldn’t figure it out. Now I think we know (with the help of Rick McKee texting me this morning). Alan, I believe, if memory serves, you promised to tell me someday who it was. Still waiting!

    1. It may be a looong wait. 🙂

      1. Haha. Damn. Well, I thought I knew who it was, but Alan confirmed that the person McKee and I thought it was was wrong. So who worked at the Rochester paper back then, and was working the graveyard shift??

  7. Fun read, Alan! Like everyone else, I had my suspicions at the time, none of whom were Locher winners, nor matched any other aspects of the clue trail you left. As I said on your Insta post, I kinda like having absolutely no idea who it was…

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.