Comic Strip of the Day Editorial cartooning

CSotD: Our Story So Far

Bennett commented that this cartoon is based on an old joke; I assume it’s the one about the fellow who fell 14 stories and fortunately survived, but, unfortunately, had fallen from15.

I have no idea how many stories we’ve fallen so far, but I know it’s going to be a mess when we hit the ground.

I don’t see a way this adventure ends well. I have to have faith that we will recapture the government and restore democracy, but, unlike the last civil war, there won’t be a formal surrender.

In the first Civil War, the Union wanted the defeated rebels to go home and work their land and so did not extract harsh penalties. Instead, the Confederate powers went home, overturned Reconstruction and set up Jim Crow.

If the current crop of rebels, turncoats and traitors lose, there won’t be a treaty for them to ignore. They will be with us always, pushing back against the reforms that ended the Depression and then toppled Jim Crow, and obstructing what they cannot prevent.

The critical question is, if the current crop of rebels, turncoats and traitors win, will the remaining opposition be as persistent a thorn in their sides, or will we, like the tattered survivors in Fahrenheit 451, carry out our resistance by memorizing books and wandering in the forest?

Survival is not enough. Wringing your hands while you watch videos of people being dragged away is not enough. Even if they never come for you, they’ve dragged you away, too, simply by virtue of having silenced you.

No need for internment camps if nobody is apt to raise hell.

That’s why the scariest dystopic movie is Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Sitting back and going with the flow makes life seem calm, comfortable and civilized.

Telnaes takes us for a wander down the path that got us here, though it stretches all the way back at least to Nixon and Reagan, who exploited divisions in society rather than working to heal them.

As Telnaes says, Trump has carried out an egocentric series of petty cheating, empty boasting and toxic lies, but none of that would matter if he were scorned and rejected for it like George Santos.

But he was, instead, embraced, not just by gullible MAGA fans but by Republicans happy to rally to his powerful flag.

The plight of people who can’t heat their houses, purchase groceries or obtain health care is of little matter to Dear Leader, who slashes funding for the less wealthy in order to cater to the uber-wealthy, and surrounds himself with the trappings of an emperor, including gilded trappings in a previously dignified, restrained White House.

He’s adding a ballroom because while we got through nearly 250 years of history without our chief executive having such a place in the executive mansion, we have a different kind of president now, who has transformed the White House into a model of Byzantine Bordello style.

What does he want, besides gilt decorations, a spacious ballroom and a paved-over rose garden?

Power, and the prestige that comes with it.

Every president has had prestige; it comes with the office. But most have found quiet ways to assert that prestige, through Reagan’s genial humor or JFK’s quick wit and general elegance or LBJ’s sometimes alarming folksiness.

Those elements of prestige were personal, and colored by policy but exhibited by style. By contrast, Trump’s bullying, power-based charisma needs to be continually reinforced with yet another fatwa against liberals, yet another call for punishing laws.

Juxtaposition of the Day

Bullying bravado is bound to bite you on the backside. Summers compares Trump’s embarrassment at missing his jobs goal to the classic Coppertone ad, suggesting that the failure is exposing him.

Ramirez suggests a more painful bite, though his “Conspiracies” label requires interpretation, since the only conspiracies surrounding the Epstein case were planted by Trump’s own supporters in an attempt to attack and embarrass powerful Democrats.

Attempts to distract, as Weyant says, may keep him afloat but are also slowing him down, and the Epstein issue is not going to go away because people haven’t been compelled by his desire to return racist names to sports teams.

It seems odd that Trump’s camp whipped up so much froth and fury over the Epstein case, given that the Democrats they hoped to disgrace were people like Bill Clinton whose time in politics was over, and that one of the few active figures embroiled in the horrors was their hero.

His fans forgave his adultery, his sex-for-money couplings and his misogynistic vulgarity about sexual assault, but the pederasty thing isn’t going away, and if he didn’t direct QAnon to make it a major cause, he certainly didn’t discourage them, either.

Juxtaposition of the Day #2

There have been a lot of sweeping changes in America lately. Granlund specifically calls out Mike Johnson, who shut down the House early to avoid a vote on releasing the files, in a gesture reminiscent of the kinniggets of the Holy Grail shouting “Run away!” as their giant Trojan rabbit was flung back at them.

Rogers adds more swept under the carpet, not just the Epstein files, which Trump had promised to release, but several other things he promised and has failed to deliver.

There is a hierarchy to these, given that failure to end the wars in Ukraine and Gaza are causes more championed by people who didn’t like him to begin with. His deportations are more controversial, and beginning to weaken his support. They are almost universally disliked, if not condemned, by voters on both sides.

But the cost of living issue is a live wire, and the Epstein files even moreso. Firefighters caution people against putting wires under carpeting, and Trump seems likely to find out why.

It’s not that the entire MAGA base will turn against him, but margins are tight enough that, even with Texas gerrymandering to find extra House seats, he can’t lose a lot of support without losing his crown.

The midterms will tell us a lot, though not if we sit idly by waiting for them to resolve things on their own.

Previous Post
Christian Daigle – RIP
Next Post
What Would Thomas Nast Do?

Comments 22

  1. Of course, in Texas, the midterms aren’t supposed to matter. Wonder how many other states have the same plan?

    1. According to the WashPost today:
      Blue-led states California, Illinois and New York have said they are considering redistricting as a response to Texas, proposals that Abbott called “crazy bluster” Monday night on Fox News.

  2. It’s bad enough that Trump has tarted the Oval Office up like some imperial Slovenian whore. Tearing down his big beautiful ballroom is going to cost real money.

  3. We now have allowed a government Of the Cockroaches, By the Cockroaches, For the Cockroaches.

  4. I haven’t looked closely into this, but it seems to me that if gerrymandering is now allowed that The Opposition has a much larger opportunity to generate more seats since their states are more fairly configured right now.

    1. Several of those states are fairly apportioned now in part because district mapping is explicitly removed from the sort of direct legislative control that would allow a blue majority to monkey with it.

      1. So they’d have to overturn/amend those laws first. Unless they were explicitly laid out in their state constitution or an amendment.

      2. In Colorado, there is a constitutional amendment stating that re-districting must be based on Federal Census Data. An Independent Congressional Redistricting Commission draws congressional district lines, while the Independent Legislative Redistricting Commission handles state senate and house districts. Each commission is made up of Democrats, Republications and Independents.

      3. Laws? Who’s paying attention to laws anymore?

  5. Resident Chump and his cronies starring in Invasion of the Democracy-Snatchers. Playing now in Washington DC and other horror spots. Fight back, people! Before it’s too late!

  6. I look forward to the next president (if there is a next president) replanting the Rose Garden. And also preserving, defending, and protecting the Constitution. That would be nice, too.

    I’m surprised by Ramirez and especially Summers. Both are such reliable bootlickers that I took a second look to see if I’d missed the point of their cartoons, but no–they actually do appear to be critical of Trump. Maybe an indicator that Epstein is inexplicably sticking? Will wonders never cease. I’m sure they’ll both be back to form tomorrow but a rare flash of principle is refreshing.

    I agree with you about “Invasion of the Body Snatchers.” Both the original and remake are very good, but the 1956 film had the advantage of landing during McCarthyism, the Cold War, the Red Scare, and other fertile ground that made a movie about the dangers of passive conformity and group-think very relevant. Maybe we’re due for another remake.

    1. Ramirez and Summers also have to sway to the winds of their audience.

  7. Recapture the government. Restore democracy. Difficult objectives on their own, but even if we could accomplish them, they’d still be insufficient because the status quo ante 2016 (or 2012 or 2008 or …) were still far along the path that led us here. “If our existential crisis is the latest iteration of a conflict that has defined the nation since its inception, America needs a truly transformative effort to propel the country closer to the kind of multiracial, pluralistic democracy it never has been yet and finally establish a stable democratic consensus that has so far eluded these United States.” — Thomas Zimmer, from his excellent article “What is America, and for whom?” at https://thomaszimmer.substack.com/p/what-is-america-and-for-whom

  8. Invasion of the Body Snatchers and The Creature from the Black Lagoon both gave me actual nightmares. Never had another until now!

  9. “The Union wanted the defeated rebels to go home…” but after Lincoln was assassinated the Union got a bit sterner about things than Lincoln indicated he had intended.

    Wexler’s cartoon is wonderful…but I’m not sure including Nixon and Reagan as objectors to the Imperial Presidency is historically all that accurate.

  10. Here in New York, back in ’22, the commission did a massive map revision six weeks before the primary and we (the Democrats) wound up losing five seats. It was a disaster.

    Last year, there was another one, not as drastic, but it caused all sorts of anxiety. Now, Hochel threatens a third….yeesh!

  11. After ridding themselves of the dictator Julius Caesar, Romans tried for hundreds of years to “restore the republic.” Are we fated to be as unsuccessful as they were?

  12. Yeah, I’m pretty much thinking Trump = Nero. “Sad.”

    1. Actually, he’s more like Commodus or Caracalla (See the two “Gladiator” films).

  13. Another outrage that I’ve only seen reported in USA Today is that Trump is trying to eliminate all Federal support to public libraries. They suggested that one of the worst hits would be to e-books. Due to immune system problems, I am very dependent on e-books to satisfy my reading itch.

    I guess because Trump doesn’t read, he thinks that no one else needs to either.

  14. I will never be able to use Coppertone again.

  15. The gerrymandering stuff seems like something out of the 1800s to this Canadian. We have independent, non-partisan commissions both federally and provincially. Seems logical. So while there can always be debate about how to divide up voting areas, the issue of real gerrymandering never really comes up. At least other aspects of the US system were well designed long ago. Like the separation of powers – Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. Well, at least it used to work…

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.