Editorial cartooning Newspaper industry

Editor on Editoons: “humorous but not too inflammatory”

The Dallas Morning News (DMN) recently received a letter appealing for a more even-handed approach to the editorial cartoons appearing in their newspaper. The paper acknowledged that it was not the only like-minded request.

So, how does The News pick editorial cartoons? And are they disproportionately anti-Trump?

above: Drew Sheneman from the May 15, 2025 Dallas Morning News

DMN Public Editor Stephen Buckley explains the circumstances and how they choose editorial cartoons:

Editorial cartoons hold a rich place in American journalism, ever since newspapers and magazines started publishing them regularly in the mid-19th century … For decades, many major newspapers boasted a staff cartoonist.

Not anymore. In recent years, as Opinion sections around the country withered, so has the presence of editorial cartoons. Some newspapers no longer run them. The News’ editorial pages remain robust, but the paper now typically picks up work published by artists who draw for national syndicates.

The Dallas Morning News seems to pick national political cartoons from the Tribune Content Agency.

Editorial Page Editor Rudy Bush says he and a small team seek editorial cartoons that are “humorous but not too inflammatory.” Sometimes, he told me, there’s a “limited selection that we can pick [that are] within the bounds of our standards.” Those days, they may have only three decent options, he says.

above: Nick Anderson from The Dallas Morning News for April 3, 2025

Buckley continued:

Conservatives are in power at both the state and national levels, and cartoonists usually make fun of whoever is in power, Bush says. “And I don’t really have a problem with that,” he adds, “as long as when people from the left are in power, we’re willing to let the cartoonists poke fun at them too. And we did that during the Biden administration.”

Occasionally, a cartoon goes too far. That was the case back in early April, when one depicted Elon Musk suspended over a burning Tesla, and readers rightly expressed their ire. “The minute I got the first note from a reader that day, I knew they were right, and we were wrong,” Bush told me. “I felt terrible about it.”

Though the cartoon remains on the DMN website.

Buckley does have one problem with the political cartoons:

They often aren’t funny.

Again the DMN’s Stephen Buckley ombuds column here.

feature image by Bill Bramhall

Previous Post
CSotD: Buckle Up. It’s Getting Rough.
Next Post
PBS Edits Anti-Trump Section Out of Spiegelman Documentary

Comments 2

  1. Looking back on the giants of the profession, my own favorites being Bill Mauldin and Herblock, they often weren’t funny. World War II often wasn’t funny, nor was the McCarthy period, etc., etc. Both men were capable of being funnier than anyone else, but sometimes you just have to lay it out without whipped cream on top. Trump, his handlers, and his minions stopped being funny a long time ago.

  2. Editorial cartoons aren’t supposed to be funny in a cozy, friendly way like Garfield or Peanuts are funny. Editorial cartoons are supposed to make you think, and yes, even shock you. They’re supposed to make you look at current events in a different way, and when possible, stir you to action. If editorial cartoons give you a warm and fuzzy chuckle and then you forget them, they’re not doing their job.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.