Comic Strip of the Day

CSotD: Domestic Comedy

Lockhorns
It's not considered hip to like the Lockhorns, but, while it is tragically bereft of misanthropic talking animals, it's a consistently funny strip and John Reiner's art is, to play with the phrase, "simply" superb.

Sear Catalog Watchmaker ToolsNot being an artist, I don't know if it's harder to create intricate detail or to work smoothly in a plain style, but what I do know as a reader is that I'd rather enjoy Reiner's line and Bunny Hoest's gagwriting than look at something that combines the intricate draftsmanship of the 1897 Sears & Roebuck catalog with a similar level of action and character development.

This ties in with my comments the other day about the herd mentality of snark, in that, while it's hip to hate the Lockhorns, it's very hip to reference the Honeymooners and their bastard child, the Flintstones, and uberhip to even know who the Bickersons were.

To which I say, "Fap!"

Upper right is kind of weak, but lower left and lower right more than make up for it, while the other two are solid 3's on a scale of 5. Your mileage may vary, but it shouldn't show up as different unless we raise the scale to 10.

I will admit that the Lockhorns are so omnipresent on comics pages that I had glazed over them and dismissed them as a strip for the bluehair crowd, until I did a reader survey in which we divided our strips up into categories of seven each and asked readers to pick one (only) in each group to keep and one (only) to dump. 

I expected the strip to be picked as the keeper by a fair number of 55+ readers, and as the one to dump by a raft of 18-34's, but it was singled out as the favorite in its category by a whole lot of readers of all ages and both sexes.

It made me start paying more attention to the strip, and I began to see why such a diverse number of people liked it. Then, a few months later, when I interviewed Bunny, I was able to really get beyond the surface-simplicity and gain an appreciation for her craft. 

There are several single-panel dailies that, on Sunday, offer multiple gags, and it's hard, when you do that, not to have, not "a stinker or two," but a layout where a couple of the gags just aren't up to the level of the others, so that you end up topping yourself.

Didn't happen to Hoest and Reiner today. This was a very solid outing.

 

Bears With Furniture

Co140209

 

Meanwhile, speaking of domestic comedy, Mike Baldwin hit me at just the right moment with this "Cornered" gag.

I had, just 12 hours earlier, ended an email exchange with this:

And now I have to go do dishes because I'm running out of places to stack them. Women who complain about their husbands relying on them to do the housework don't get it — we're not relying on them to do it. They just get grossed out a lot easier than we do. Which, y'know, is THEIR thing, not MINE.

Besides, I have one of my back-up laptops over the sink and, if you do dishes too often, you can't stream anything longer than Jon Stewart because the dishes run out before the show is over. That makes no sense now, does it?

Yes, I know guys who carry a lot of Felix Unger in their DNA. 

But 99 percent of the humor of The Odd Couple was based on the assumption that Felix was annoying and that Oscar was the default, the guy who got the babes and who you would want to play poker and have a beer with.

And that Felix just said, "with whom."

Or, as it was expressed in a Rita Rudner quote that became our household mantra when the definition of "household" came down to me and my teenaged sons, "Men don't live like people. They live like bears with furniture."

The good thing was that, through most of those years, I was in a long-distance relationship, which meant that every four-to-six weeks, my girlfriend would come to visit, in anticipation of which I'd go into a flurry of making the place once more inhabitable by humans.

Today? Well, read the caption again.

Of course, one of the things I learned in my second bachelorhood — which, by the way, is a time of delightful, eye-opening frankness — is that a lot of guys won't even take a shower before a date, much less clean up their caves. 

For the record: I still bathe regularly.

Just in case anyone out there was thinking of offering an incentive for me to clean up the place.

 

OHGODPLEASEMAKETHEMSTOP

I know a lot of cartoonists make a practice of not looking at other people's work for fear of being influenced by it. 

I also realize that sometimes more than one cartoonist will come up with the same idea at the same time, and, while it's kind of a sign that you didn't come up with anything that wasn't a little obvious, it's inevitable that it happens every so often, even with reasonably good ideas.

That said, come on. Next person who draws this damn thing should lose cartooning privileges for a month.

 

No dear jumper

Mike Peterson has posted his "Comic Strip of the Day" column every day since 2010. His opinions are his own, but we welcome comments either agreeing or in opposition.

Previous Post
CSotD: It’s the Song, not the (Alvy) Singer
Next Post
CSotD: Three you should read

Comments 2

  1. I find “The Lockhorns” to be too aggressively negative, as if the couple is locked in a “hate-hate” relationship with no hope of escape – it was nice to see the last 2 of this Sunday’s five panels about something else than their mutual disgust. I wonder how the “whole lot of readers of all ages and both sexes” break down by marital status. And did you notice that every peripheral character has the same ‘sad eyes’ as the central couple? And while I usually agree with you on the art (except wondering sometimes if Reiner can actually draw someone smiling), there’s something odd about the upper left side cartoon – is Leroy’s head strangely smaller in proportion to his body than usual?
    I much prefer “The Better Half”, which is often silly but far less adversarial – even Wikipedia notes “While the Lockhorns appear to generally hate one another, Stanley and Harriet do appear to try to love one another despite everything.” And the Sunday five panels are always related, this week even more than usual – variations on “Stanley makes ridiculous justifications for bad diet”, but most of them ARE funny to me. And Harriet’s ‘five mile stare’ is a chuckle; can you imagine the look Loretta Lockhorn would’ve given Leroy? Yikes. I’m old enough to remember The Better Half’s original artist and how Randy Glasbergen radically changed the look to be much more stylized and simplified, and once I got used to it, I like it – it doesn’t get in the way of the joke. And the characters DO occasionally smile.

  2. Now, see, I felt that way too until the responses made me re-examine the strip. For example, in today’s layout of five strips, only one — the center one — shows anger. And Reiner often shows them smiling. Just not very often at each other!
    I’ll certainly accept that Stanley and Harriet are much more of a united couple, and I also agree that Randy Glasbergen has added a lot of life to the feature, but it’s a different feature.
    The major point is that you can’t grouse over the prickly marriage of the Lockhorns and then gush over the Honeymooners. You can dislike them both, but it’s inconsistent to like one and not the other unless you’ve got very specific quibbles, and I think what Bunny says about people projecting whole scenarios onto the single panel feature kind of addresses that — I’d submit that you don’t see the “Baby, you’re the greatest!” scenes in the Lockhorns, but they’re there.
    If not, then show me a single-panel rendition of a Honeymooners show that conveys the plot without showing Ralph’s frustrations in life.
    None of this, of course, negates your opinion. But it means it’s time for you to get up and go get us another pitcher.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.