Comic Strip of the Day

CSotD: Technical issues

  Knightlife
I may be a daily blogger, but I still have my Luddite side, as well as my cheap side, and have not gone to a Smartphone. This is in part because, as a struggling freelancer, I have enough to do just to pay for access at home, never mind adding another monthly bill so that I can check my email while I'm at the dog park. Which, along with the grocery store and the post office, is about the only place I go, given that my office is one of the three rooms in my apartment.

But today's Knight Life does graze, if not touch directly upon, the issue of everyone in the comics business creating apps and reformatting their comics to fit on a telephone screen. I think that, if you do that, you are estopped from bitching about the size of comics in the newspaper. (For the young people reading this, "estopped" does not mean "stopped in a very hip, on-line sort of way.")

It's quite another thing to prepare your material for an iPad or Kindle, where the size of the screen makes it practical to include artwork, and even to post something that consists entirely of artwork. But there is a difference between trying to be artistically valid and trying to make some coin, and, if people genuinely want to see your comic — or "Lawrence of Arabia" — on a cell phone screen, you are entering that area of "as long as the check doesn't bounce …"

Now, a dozen years or so ago, when the Emperor's New Tailors were measuring the newspaper industry for its lovely on-line wardrobe, there was a valid question of "What check?" which nobody asked for fear of appearing unhip and unfit for their positions. Today, well, nobody writes checks anyway, and they don't write them for the amounts of money that are forthcoming, which remain much as Bill Holbrook noted a decade ago in this Kevin & Kell:

Kk20010417
Which brings to mind that I haven't heard anyone talk about how you format your comics such that, when they appear on a cell phone screen, there is some inducement for the viewer to also purchase a book or plush toy. But I guess you could sell them a book in the form of a whole lot of strips they could access with their Smartphone.

Or something.

The intersection between artistry and commercial success has always been fraught, but the issue of how much technology needs to come into it has a few new wrinkles.

Sarah Laing's comic, "Let Me Be Frank," is, ironically, not well-formatted to post here — too large and colorful and pretty and posted in segments — but go have a look as she ponders the question of, among other things, how necessary it is for a cartoonist to Twitter. The question is not only well-asked — her work is particularly appealing — but also very relevant given that she's in New Zealand, and, if you're going to be artistically valid but somewhat obscure, that's probably a pretty good place to do it.

 

Previous Post
OH, BROTHER! contest winner announced
Next Post
CSotD: Three colleges I always confuse: Depaul, Depauw, Default

Comments 7

  1. A morning’s visit with Mike Peterson is seldom without its benefits. Today, you doubled my profit: Sarah Laing is now in my bookmarks file (“I’ve got my novel to finish… my room is a mess”) and now I know what “estopped” means, which I didn’t half an hour ago, which I guess means that I am a young person.
    Bonus profit from you today: I learned that “screw up” might not mean the same thing in Auckland as it does in Oakland.

  2. Howard (Schlock Mercenary) Tayler was already successfully supporting himself and his family with his webcomic before he launched his iPhone and iPad apps; these have apparently been reasonably successful as he’s been looking for an Android developer to partner with. Some hints of iPhone performance (and of his business model) here:
    http://www.plus14.com/iphone/schlock-mercenary/

  3. Howard is one of a handful of cartoonists I know whom I have actually met in three dimensions, which is ironic, given that he is one of the great on-line cartoonists. Looking at his site, it doesn’t surprise me that he’s on top of this, and I see some good things there. Still, even one panel at a time, a cell phone is a small pallet. If he comes back to the New England Webcomics shindig next year, I’ll draw him out on this a little more and report back. However, I still think doing graphic things on a cell phone (as opposed to an iPad) is silly.

  4. And, Sherwood, your comment reminds me of the case some time ago when a young man somehow got on the wrong plane and thought he was on a short flight to Oakland, but was, instead, on a much longer flight to a place that — with the interposition of an accent — sounded like the city he was looking for.

  5. … which episode is what spurred me to use those two cities rather than, say, Christchurch and Corpus Christi. Would never happen these days, eh?

  6. Regarding graphics on the cell-phone — I felt exactly the same way, Mike… right up until I got an iPhone and realized I could read comics anywhere with a device that fit in my pocket.
    The Schlock Mercenary app leverages server-side meta-data to define panel borders so that you can navigate a large strip one panel at a time. It’s not an ideal way to read comics, but it’s the best way to read them on a small device.
    I regularly used my iPhone and the Schlock App to call up strips for reference while working on new stuff. Now that I have an iPad I use it instead. The comics-reading experience on that device is far superior.

  7. The iPad looks promising to me, Howard, though I would hesitate to spend money on something so limited — but, as said, that’s more about my budget and the fact that I’m not away from my laptop very often anyway. But you’ve got me curious. I’d like to see how this goes over the next few years as both iPad-type devices and smartphones become more widespread. Hard to see the phone as more than a convenient crutch for when you don’t have a better choice at hand.
    I suppose one immediate question is how it’s playing out in Japan where I understand a lot of young people don’t even have “computers” and do everything on their phones — but are people who care about graphics in that group? (Come to think of it, I know someone on the Pacific Rim I can ask.)
    Thanks for joining in. I DO like the idea of using the iPad for reference while you’re working. I’ll have to see the smartphone version to see if I think it’s practical — but, again, the customer is always right, and if the apps are selling, well …

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.