Comic Strip of the Day

CSotD: Forget it, Jake. It’s Idiocracy.

Db121006

Doonesbury decries the lack of information available in the Information Society.

There's plenty of information, of course, but you have to go look for it, which, even for a dedicated info-scrounger, is not so easy. Even Google News is driven by what other people think is worth knowing, and so, while it's a pretty good resource, you still have to sort through the stupid to find the not-stupid.

That is, the lead story could be that Netanyahu is threatening to spark a war with Iran, but you have to drill down to find actual, responsible coverage, because the top link is often some ridiculously skewed, five-paragraph New York Post story or an LA Times blog of similarly distorted, unsourced content. 

The other problem is that, while Google News does send people to these sites and thus help them gain page views, the financial side of all this free content hasn't really taken off, and, to the degree that it has, favors not creating a site that gives people a daily briefing but giving them a lowest-common-denominator product that makes Newton Minow's "Vast Wasteland" look like graduate school.

I watched "Idiocracy" last night with my granddaughter, who is taking a course in which the movie was suggested. The premise doesn't justify a full-length movie, and Judge's dysgenic theory that we are headed for a world run by morons because stupid people have more children is funny, but I don't think a very accurate portrayal of what is causing the slide.

Still, "Idiocracy's" running joke of a top-rated TV show called "Ow! My Balls!" isn't that far off the mark. And the problem isn't so much that large numbers of people are watching Honey Boo Boo or that a TV network that calls itself "The Learning Channel" would stoop to putting the show on the air.

People at least realize that, when they're watching Honey Boo Boo, they're watching crap.

But when a network news show, with 20-some minutes to present the news, devotes half that precious time to YouTube videos and heartwarming glurge about reunited orphans, people who watch still think they've watched the news.

Which gives them permission to spend the rest of the evening watching the real-world equivalent of "Ow! My Balls!"

Trudeau spent the last week skewering the Huffington Post, which was a pretty good, admittedly liberal news aggregator until it reached a level where Ariana could literally and spiritually sell out and turn it into a freak show in which semi-clothed celebrities and cute kittens jostle for clicks alongside liberal blog entries defending unions, written by unpaid scabs:

Db121005

The argument in media is that the profits from bad, best-selling garbage is what makes it possible to present the good, important quality material. This is, however, a load of bullshit, for several reasons.

First and foremost is that the days of the dedicated entrepeneur publisher are pretty much gone. The only mission that seems intact these days is the mission of making money, and people whose sole reason for running a business is to maximize short-term profit do not engage in things that will cause them to lose money now, even if it would pay off in the long run.

For newspapers, that means cutting ties to their local communities just at a time when localism is the thing that makes them stand out from the global Internet.

It means shutting down the Washington bureau, where small chains used to pool money for a reporter to write about issues of importance to each that were the topic of pending legislation.

Today, you may see wire stories about major national legislation, but you no longer see stories about, say, a federal bill to rebuild crumbling dams or that would help soybean farmers in your region.

And they cut back, not just on the comics page but on staff cartoonists who brought a sense of localism to their pages, Syracuse being just the latest to decide that cheap, national cartoons are every bit as relevant and attractive to their readers as a graphic comment on the cost of the new civic center or on the mayor's pipedream of luring a new, major employer.

And that's not just the traditional standard old-line dailies. The Village Voice, once an important alternative news source, sold out to the beancounters years ago and has gradually laid off all the expensive, thoughtful writers who made the paper matter. Now they've cut Tom Tomorrow, having slashed their other comics some time ago.

In the case of the Syracuse paper, there is at least the odd excuse that the Advance chain, which is cutting back to three day a week pubication, appears to be gradually shutting down the print side of its business. I say "odd" because, logically, an attempt to shift to on-line only would suggest enhancing your local flavor. 

But not if it costs money.

Not if it doesn't generate immediate profits in the current quarter.

Oh well. As Matt Bors suggested recently, we're bailing water with pitchforks.

Bors

Previous Post
CSotD: Please don’t ask, don’t tell, about Barbara
Next Post
CSotD: When did this happen?

Comments 7

  1. Try the BBC. They still have a silly, old-fashioned idea that they ought to provide some news amongst the padding. True, they don’t have extensive coverage of local US news, but who does?

  2. phred! The BBC is a SOCIALIST thing! Shame on you.
    Of course, the BBC website is where I go for news in the morning, but only when nobody’s looking. So don’t tell anybody.

  3. I’m lucky to live in an area where the small local paper is owned by McClatchy (San Luis Obispo Tribune), the only chain with a Washington Bureau that does more than print ‘approved quotes’. The other day, the Bureau had an article about an almost-local congressman (closer to Fresno, where they also own the Fresno Bee) who was claiming to be one of the most ‘bi-partisan’ Republicans in the House, complete with some serious analysis of his votes and what he’s bi-partisan about (mostly regional issues, which is smart for a California Republican). The paper (and its website sanluisobispo.com) covers well the local politics (and the several cities within this 250K population county), much of it written under the bylines of three long-time writers who also have ‘columns’ where we can judge their POV/biases. The way it should be done, IMO. And if/when the ‘Trib’ falls short, we have an ‘alt-weekly’ that is NOT owned by Village Voice (newtimesslo.com) and a non-profit local news website (calcoastnews.com) founded by a Journalism Professor at CalPoly U. (who passed away recently, but his tradition seems to be well carried on – it even has one official enemy in the County Board of Supervisors, who it has exposed as a dirty trickster, even while agreeing with most of his politics). We’re well-served journalistically (although it was ‘interesting’ when a local TV news anchorman quit that job to become Public Information Officer for the Sheriff’s department).
    But if I may challenge one premise of your column here, the idea of using fluff content to attract an audience is just following in the long tradition of newspapers, which always sold a lot of papers for their funny papers, sports scores, stock quotes, classified ads and coupons (imagine: people buying media to get the ads!), and made the IMO dubious claim that the sports and comics readers were also exposed to the REAL news. I grew up in the 60s/70s and we subscribed to the LA Times whose news coverage was ‘more liberal’ than my father liked, and therefore totally ignored (but what about those Dodgers?). And I think my father was fairly typical. I wouldn’t be surprised if the headline links in the HuffPo are getting noticed more often than newspaper headlines (under 120pt).

  4. Well said.
    I’ve long acknowledged the place of fluff not just in the marketing of a newspaper but in its construction. As a sophomore in college, we were reading “Hamlet” and, when we came to the graveyard scene, the professor asked why Shakespeare had written it. After hearing us talk about the need for comic relief in this tense psychological drama, he nodded, not denying our statements, but then pointed out that Shakespeare had these clowns in his company and needed to write in something for them to do.
    Similarly, a good newspaper (or website or other) has a need to add levity for any number of reasons, from marketing to relief of tension to simply acknowledging that it is expected and needs to be there.
    But here’s my take, in two bites:
    1. Regular readers have heard this one: A newspaper is to a diner as a book is to a restaurant. The “meal” served at a newspaper does not inspire ecstatic raves, but it needs to be tasty, wholesome and satisfying. People don’t spend much for the meal, but they expect to go away feeling good about having gone there. Nobody goes there for the french fries or cole slaw, but, if those aren’t good, people won’t come back, and if there are two diners side by side and one of them has really good french fries or a nice selection of homemade pies, that’s apt to tip the decision in their favor.
    2. To build on this analogy, you still have to have a good (not spectacular) main course. And that’s where you see a difference between the paper that has a good sports section, a nice comics page, good advice columnists and solid news coverage — compared to the one with the Page 3 Weather Girl, screaming headlines and shots of dead bodies. It’s not that you have to work your way past all the crap to find the good news coverage, but, in the case of the NY Post and its ilk, there’s nothing there once you’ve sorted through the dreck.
    Or, to abruptly switch metaphors and reference the old joke about the over-optimistic little boy, there is no pony under that pile of horseshit.
    And I realize that not everybody reads the A-section, but it’s there, and it’s out front, so that not only can you find it, but the newspaper has proclaimed it important. So the message is delivered, even if you decline the invitation.
    Granted, HuffPost does occasionally offer a nugget of genuine reporting amid the sideboobs and silly, slanted opinion pieces, but, you know, I’ve never envied the little sparrows to make a living by picking the seeds from the manure pile.
    (San Luis Obispo sounds like a pretty good media market. Don’t move.)

  5. Our newspaper (Myrtle Beach Sun News) is a McClatchy paper and seems to be hanging in there, and has a couple local investigative reporters so good that i’m both amazed and relieved that they stay here. This is SC, and it also does the apparently necessary pandering to the fundamentalist right wing. It actually printed a letter calling for our responding to the embassy shootings by mass bombing of civilians, and i was horrified enough to email the editor. He told me he was planning an editorial about the dangers of blanket condemnation of Muslims, and wanted it printed as an example. Seems to me it could have been quoted in his editorial, without standing in the letters column as though it were a legitimate “side” of an issue.
    The paper recently did what too many are doing and fired a long time and great features and food reporter, who really got out there and met and wrote about people and projects, as well as recipes. Now we get packaged food and garden stories with no relevance to the area. Guess what? Coffee cake has no coffee in it! It’s a cake served with coffee. Imagine my surprise. We get such filler drivel now. I really hope McClatchy is not just doing what all the sinking papers are doing, just at a slower rate.
    And Sherwood – no need to hide anything. All college professors are pinkos. Everybody knows this.

  6. I discovered the BBC about 10 years or so ago and gave up on US TV news immediately. Sometimes their coverage is as bad as American TV news, but it’s often much better.
    In a previous job I was able to read the press (in English) from North Korea, Libya, and other such counties with a controlled press. Watching Fox News I am dismayed how much they’d fit into the same model; the scapegoating, the “we’re the only ones who tell you the truth”, the spin they put on everything but the sports scores. It’s really amazing. If Romney wins and they start calling him “Dear Leader” or some such, the transformation will be complete.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.