Comic Strip of the Day

CSotD: The ACA gets Gored

Caremudgeons
Jen Sorensen has become something of the standard bearer for the Affordable Care Act, which is okay with me. I like my standard bearers to have some passion for the standard they bear, and I'm also glad she's received some credit beyond the alternative comics world for her advocacy.

(Before we go any farther, I'm going to point out that, while she doesn't have a book out, she sells personally signed copies of her work at an incredibly affordable price. I say this because I use her work here more often than I feel comfortable with. Give her some of your money. And now, back to our program.)

She hits the mark squarely with this one, and it scares me.

I was just involved in a fruitless on-line discussion, which may be a redundant expression, about B-roll, those canned video features that local TV stations buy as filler material for their local news. Someone was conflating them into a conspiracy theory that the news is being managed by some central brain trust, which is a blatant violation of the rule that one should never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity.

Or, more specifically, to see conspiracies that can be more simply explained by laziness and lack of imagination.

There is another rule, which is known as Proverbs 26:4, which is "Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him." I violate that one all the time, but wotthehell, I also talk to the dog. In terms of wasted discussions, responding to Internet posts is only a slight step down from that.

But I love the British term "newsreader," because terms like "anchor" and "reporter" give these people way too much credit. I'm not here today, however, to pile on the Ted Baxters and Ron Burgundys so much as to point out the real perils of this pack journalism and "received wisdom."

I did not want Bob Dole to win the presidency in 1996, but there was no prejudice involved in my having said, "Uh-oh, he's screwed," when Jay Leno began repeatedly making age jokes about him in the "Tonight Show" monologue. Leno speaks to, and for, the booboisie, and once he declared Dole fair game for mockery, the game was over.

In retrospect, Dole's candidacy was little more to begin with than a Lifetime Achievement Award from grateful Republicans, who knew Clinton was going to win re-election. Leno was simply a picador, shoving in his lance to draw first blood from a bull whose slaughter was foreordained.

I feel worse about what the media did to Al Gore, not because I liked him but because it was cheap and dishonest and impacted what turned out to be a very close election.

And it was avoidable. That is, the whole issue of the Swift Boat liars and John Kerry was not cheap (someone paid a lot to bankroll that initiative) nor was it as innocently stupid: It took a substantial breach of common sense to play "on the one hand, but on the other" with the clearly flawed testimonies and serious accusations involved in that.

The branding of Al Gore as a serial liar involved far less effort on the part of his enemies and far more laziness, pack-mentality and incompetence on the part of the media. 

The chief example is the "Al Gore invented the Internet" meme, which was so demonstrably false that repeating it was like reporting that Lincoln had come out against the cemetery at Gettysburg because he said "we cannot hollow this ground."

Not only was it not what he meant, it wasn't even what he said. 

At least — whether it was fair or germane to harp on it — Bob Dole really was old. Gore was ridiculed and his credibility undercut by a complacent, lazy media who joined in by adding to the impression, misreporting what he said about Love Canal and creating the "Al Gore lies" legend, which was then perpetuated and spread by reporters too lazy or perhaps not bright enough to do their own homework.

And so now the website for the Affordable Care Act is an admitted shambles, and the piling on has begun. "On the Media" has had some excellent coverage of what is actually going on and how much it matters, but they are preaching to the choir.

The congregation, meanwhile, is getting a clear message that, since the bus that was supposed to pick up the kids wouldn't start, our entire public educational system is a total failure that needs to be scrapped in favor of private schools.

The drumbeat of "It doesn't work!" has begun.

Betamax was clearly inferior to VHS.

The Edsel was obviously a lousy car.

Al Gore was a liar.

Obamacare won't work.

*sigh*

Media laziness and public gullibility are a couple of pre-existing conditions Obamacare can't cover.

Mike Peterson has posted his "Comic Strip of the Day" column every day since 2010. His opinions are his own, but we welcome comments either agreeing or in opposition.

Previous Post
Big changes coming for The Daily Cartoonist
Next Post
More Silicon Valley money getting into journalism

Comments 9

  1. While Jen doesn’t have a book out right now, she had one in 2008 (“One Nation Oh My God”) that I bought a few years ago. Much like her weekly strip she makes a comment on each one.

  2. All I know is, my clients (I’m a Certified Home Health Aide) are not getting things paid for that they were before. One client sold her car (she wasn’t going to drive much any more) so she wouldn’t have to pay the monthly insurance premium so she would have money for her meds. Maybe it’s different for seniors.

  3. You have to distinguish between the ACA coverage and the overall reforms. The coverage doesn’t kick in until January, so all the talk about sign-ups is speculative, as is talk about what premiums for that coverage will be. And that portion is irrevelant for seniors because they have Medicare instead.
    There have been other provisions that have begun and it’s possible that insurance companies have begun increasing consumer costs as a result of having to abandon some things they were able to do before — I’m not sure when, for instance, they stop being allowed to cut off cancer patients after a cap has been reached.
    Prescription costs should have gone down, but I know the pharmacy companies got a lot of lobbying done to undercut the intentions of that law, which is separate from the ACA and involved a lot of, ahem, “compromise” and “negotiation.”
    But one flaw of anecdotal reports is that people may be missing something that would have saved them from the impact — in other words, a particular person may not know she is eligible for a different plan or a different type of coverage or a completely other program that would negate the impact she is experiencing.
    Not saying that what you report isn’t happening, but I’d want statistical reports or something to indicate that it is a widespread problem and that there isn’t a solution that is either not in force yet or that hasn’t gotten sufficient publicity.

  4. Always remember: Insurance is a business. Businesses exist for only one reason: to make money for their owners. The products or services they make and sell are a means to an end. The people they employ are a cost of doing business. The goal is to set the price as high possible and keep expenses as low as possible. Any excuse to raise prices or reduce costs will be used. (Stockholder advocates would call it a “fiduciary duty.”)

  5. I think we should scrap it– and extend Medicare to all citizens, regulate the cost of prescriptions so cheap, necessary drugs like like asthma inhalers don’t suddenly skyrocket in the US from $12 to $175 when they can be bought in any other country for $7. We keep trying to solve a ridiculously expensive, inefficient, and much too limited system by applying complicated patches that then need more complicated patches. Cut the crap and let’s join the rest of the civilized world already. “Socialized medicine”? BRING IT ON!

  6. Can you imagine the unemployment if health insurance really were outlawed (as I think it should be)?
    James Clavell introduced me to “Don’t break his rice bowl” in _Shogun_. Real health-care-finance reform will break a *lot* of rice bowls, mostly corporate. (Remember, the Republicans protect corporate rice bowls, and the Democrats protect labour/union rice bowls.)

  7. Mike, premiums are not speculative, you can go to the exchange and sign up now, which means you are locking in the premium price you will pay next year. It’s not a “guess” or “estimate” of the premium you will pay next year, it’s the actual price. Nothing speculative, actual data. Almost everyone I know who had a personal policy before is seeing a substantial price reduction for their premium thru the exchange, and often increased and improved coverage, without caps, without exclusions for pre-existing conditions, etc.
    The people who are getting hit the hardest are mainly those who are self-employed and make enough that they don’t get a subsidy and who have been going without insurance because they are – for now – healthy. They have been skating by with the gamble that if they get sick they will be able to afford the out-of-pocket fees (how – given that they say they can’t afford the premiums?), or that they can just go bankrupt to avoid paying for catastrophic health problems (e.g. cancer) that they incur before they become eligible for medicaid. They think they have “a right” to have that type of “plan” for paying (or rather, not paying) for their health care. All while denouncing ACA as socialism and saying they are in support of “personal responsibility”. They can’t see the irony and hypocrisy in their actions and positions.

  8. True, Tabby — I should have said that, unless you have access to sign up, it’s all speculation, and a lot of people are happy to speculate.
    My understanding is that the blockages are in states that refused to play nicely and so are stuck with the federal website. I’m in one of those states and finally gave up a week ago, called the phone number and got through — but have not yet seen my paperwork which is supposed to be coming.
    But there is some flex in what’s happening, based on pricing that depends on how many people sign up. The subsidies are supposed to take that into consideration so that, over the next couple of years, as more people sign on and the pool gets larger, the premiums were genuinely go down so that the subsidies are no longer crucial and can decrease.
    Of course, the joker in all this is that Nancy Pelosi was mocked for saying that, until it was up and running, people would not likely understand how it all fit together. I think the opponents are counting on just that, which is why they want to strangle it in its crib, before people see that it works.

  9. Then there are those who don’t think they can afford the premiums and simply pay out-of-pocket for their health care. In my case, we got help from the hospital that provided the care, and from the drug companies. We are making monthly payments on old bills.
    Not “a right,” just “right.”

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.