AAEC Editorial cartooning Journalism

AAEC Statement on Don Lemon

The Association of American Editorial Cartoonists has issued a statement about the arrest of Don Lemon:

There’s a reason free speech and freedom of the press are the first of the essential liberties enshrined as the Bill of Rights in our Constitution. If people aren’t free to speak and assemble and if the press isn’t free to report those protected activities the government can conduct its business in secret and lawlessly. Journalists stand on the line that divides democracy and tyranny. Only tyrants attack journalists. Only tyrants arrest journalists.

Our members are artists, commentators, and thought leaders. They are journalists. We stand with Don Lemon and other journalists who have been arrested, threatened, and attacked. The Trump Administration’s arrest of Don Lemon for the constitutionally protected act of reporting in Minnesota is the act of a tyrant. Previous efforts to indict and arrest Mr. Lemon had been consistently rejected by prosecutors and federal judges as clearly contrary to the law, the Constitution, and established principles of democracy. Despite this, the Administration weaponized the President’s now personal prosecutors from the headquarters of the Department of Justice to make Don Lemon’s arrest. Those lawyers should be disbarred. Mr. Lemon should be freed.

Read the full statement at the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists (AAEC) website.

The Guardian reports that other Press Freedom groups are condemning the arrests of Don Lemon and Georgia Fort. Early objectors raising their voices are the Knight First Amendment Institute, the International Press Institute, the National Association of Black Journalists, the Reporters’ Committee for Freedom of the Press, Free Press Action, and PEN America.

Previous Post
Missed It: Garfield’s 50th
Next Post
CSotD: Saturday Morning Apolitical Cartoons

Comments 9

  1. All press associations should seize this opportunity to scream about the loss of freedom. “When life hands you lemons…”

  2. Making matters even more heinous, he was arrested under a law that was originally meant to protect women entering certain healthcare centers, and now is being used to protect Christian nationalist hate speech.

  3. “I turned our camera off for them because they’re giving some critical information. Everybody’s ready to go.” -Don Lemon

    Don didn’t just show up and report what happened. He knew what was going to happen, knew it was supposed to be secret and helped keep it secret.
    You don’t get to invade people’s private space and interrupt a religious service in the name of “free speech.” And calling it “journalism” doesn’t turn participation into reporting.
    That’s why he’s facing federal felony charges. He participated in interrupting people’s constitutionally protected rights. -Jeffery Mead/X

    https://x.com/martensmatt1/status/2017424745717731792?s=20
    https://x.com/nicksortor/status/2017351770473668975?s=20

    That the AAEC-an openly unapologetic liberal organization from the top down is defending Don Lemon’s “freedom of speech” is laughable. -ML

  4. -and my “comment is awaiting moderation”. Well of course it is. I’m a conservative whose speech must me moderated.

    1. Your comment awaited moderation because the robotic overlord controlling our letters section puts an automatic hold on any remarks that contain more than one link.

      1. Oh come on DD — if Mike Lester didn’t have his Persecution Complex, he would cease to exist.

  5. Don Lemon violated the F.A.C.E. Act. He’s always been an opinion commentator and is now an anti-MAGA activist, interrupting and impeding the religious rights of parishioners because of his unhinged derangement.

    1. Of course the MAGA DoJ mob couldn’t get a judge to sign off on the illegality of Lemon and Georgia Fort reporting on others who *allegedly* violated the F.A.C.E. Act and had to go through a grand jury to get an official complaint.

  6. Correct, although there’s easily probable cause with Lemon’s own words and video evidence Fort provided. Judges are generally required to recuse themselves from a case if their impartiality might reasonably be questioned or if they have a conflict of interest. Plenty of that going on in liberal Minnesota. I agree there needs to be a fair trial to ensure confidence in the judicial system.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.