Comic Strip of the Day Editorial cartooning

CSotD: The Experts Explain It All

This being a “where do we start?” moment, we’ll start before yesterday’s gathering of the brass with Marty Two Bulls’ reaction to the Secretary of Defense War’s restoration of medals of honor to soldiers who participated in the Wounded Knee Massacre.

Granted, Two Bulls is Lakota and so has a particular reason to feel that shooting down surrendering Lakota men, women, children and old people is reprehensible, not heroic. However, proclaiming the heroism of their killers is fully in line not only with Hegseth’s speech about the “military ethos” but is also consistent with his record of having intervened to obtain pardons for three men convicted of war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Anderson illustrates disdain for Hegseth’s lecturing of senior officers, though he did spend about seven years in the service and earned a Bronze Star in Iraq. However, he likely had the least military experience in the room except for the draft-dodger who accompanied him.

Which is to say that it takes a lot of damn nerve to lecture men with decades of military experience on how they and their troops should behave, and a barely hidden message to announce that men with ingrown facial hair and razor bumps must still shave daily.

Speaking with contempt of fat men in the presence of the President is a whole other matter. Even so, there’s a difference between declaring that recruits should be in better shape and suggesting that the military’s overall fitness rules have to be tightened.

Hegseth did have the advantage of having his speech followed by an over-long, disjointed, vainglorious speech by Dear Leader in which he asked them to applaud, which is often seen in such gatherings in North Korea but is not permitted at meetings of American senior officers.

But don’t take my word for it. Read what West Point grad and multi-generational military brat Lucian Truscott IV had to say. (Put down your coffee before you read it.)

“Unhinged” is one word I heard on the news shows describing Trump’s speech this morning. So is “bonkers.” One report called Trump “meandering” and “exhausted.” But no description could capture what took place in Quantico, Virginia this morning.

Beyond Trump’s boasting, campaigning and personal discursions, what Truscott objected to is what Dr. MacLeod notes: The transformation of Hegseth’s lecture on military discipline into Trump’s call for the military to practice for warfare by invading American cities with Democratic mayors.

This is something that, as Horsey says, has no place in America.

That’s not solely a liberal position; the Cato Institute, a bastion of libertarian thought, has defended the Posse Comitatus Act for years.

The issue, however, may go beyond whether it is legal to use the military as police. The Trump administration has established a pattern of ignoring the courts when they conflict with its policies, or of seeking fast, friendly, unexplained decisions by the dependably 6-3 Supreme Court.

To bring a note of some optimism into an otherwise bleak discussion, Joyce Vance wrote last night of a stunning slap-down delivered by a senior judge in Boston in a case about the First Amendment rights of foreign students, to which he attached the above note and in conclusion of which he wrote

Can you imagine a masked marine? It is a matter of honor — and honor still matters. To us, masks are associated with cowardly desperados and the despised Ku Klux Klan. In all our history we have never tolerated an armed masked secret police. Carrying on in this fashion, ICE brings indelible obloquy to this administration and everyone who works in it.

Trump’s portion of the day was, as Wuerker suggests, a blatant attempt to recruit the military for his own political goals, not just in hopes they would vote in his favor but insisting that they allow their troops to be deployed to enforce his personal political goals.

He not only repeatedly belittled the previous Commander in Chief but spoke of “the enemy within,” clearly meaning not only immigrants but Democrats, and not by implication but in direct words. Can an All-American version of the Nuremberg Laws be far away?

Which sounds hysterical, but military in the streets would have sounded hysterical a year ago. Being legally permitted to pick people out for arrest based on their skin color would have sounded hysterical a year ago.

It’s necessary these days to constantly adjust to the present moment, though becoming too comfortable with things amounts to collaboration.

You need to maintain a level of outrage that keeps you alert and active and unafraid.

The day may come when you need to explain the role you played in all this, and with luck it won’t look like the scene in Bagley’s cartoon.

But history tells us that truth will out. Some 40 years after the war, the arrest and trial of Klaus Barbie shattered the notion that, throughout the German occupation, all of France was active in the Resistance.

It turned out that not only was “the Butcher of Lyon” guilty of sending 7,500 French Jews and Resistance fighters to concentration camps and executing 4,000 more, but it became apparent that he did so openly and that plenty of French citizens did not oppose him.

Silence implies consent, and collaboration is neither easily explained, nor readily excused.

There is some grim humor in the notion of a man bombing Iran without warning, calling for the occupation of Gaza so he can build a resort there, and ordering troops to suppress his own people, and still thinking he deserves to stand alongside Nelson Mandela, Malala Yousafzai and Doctors Without Borders.

But we must deal with it now, and laugh about it later.

There is this: While gathering generals and admirals together was an expensive and unnecessary security risk, the real security risk to Dear Leader’s plans is how readily these senior officers could see each other’s reactions throughout the event and what they may have been able to discreetly discuss amongst themselves after the gathering was over.

Caesar had his Brutus, Charles the First, His Cromwell,
and George the Third … may profit by their example.
If this be treason, make the most of it. – Patrick Henry

Previous Post
Ashleigh Brilliant – RIP
Next Post
Topps Baseball Card Cartoonists – Bottom of the Ninth

Comments 24

    1. Thanks. It was helpful (and fascinating—glad I didn’t listen to the whole rally). The synopsis was more than enough and as said he listened to it so we didn’t have to.

    2. That was it. Thanks — fixed!

  1. I’ve worked in the medical field for going on 20 years now, and I know a “dementia patient that the family is in denial about” when I see it. That “speech” from our ostensible president felt just like trying to find out why this person is in your office but getting their favorite brand of shoe and their thoughts on land wars in Asia instead. It usually happens not too much longer before they wind up in the hospital for a UTI and start sundowning and *then* the kids who insist Grandpa is “still sharp as a tack” start to realize that, no, actually Grandpa’s been wearing the same socks and leaving the kettle unattended for a few months now.

    Considering the “leftist media” was freaking out every time Biden got a sniffle, I wonder what it’s going to take before whatever Trump has going on can’t be ignored?

    1. They don’t care. He’s just a figurehead for Project 25. A fine distraction, as it were.

    2. Apparently the Elder Fred Trump was similarly suffering from cognitive deficits in his later years, and the Trump family got him an office and a secretary and he went into the office every day signing meaningless papers. Seems like a good idea….

      1. A second term Reagan style Presidency. The infamous autopen is probably being played with great vigor. as they say, every projection…

    3. SERIOUSLY? Never seen a leader so sharp and dialed into the electorate. Childish insults just provoke counter-insults, adding little substance to fruitful conversation.

      1. Aaand, you just proved our point. Own goal, Jailor Joe.

    1. There was another pair of same-gag cartoons and I chose one. It’s inevitable when everyone jumps on the same story, particularly when it’s a case of getting your work out before the issue becomes stale.

      1. It certainly is not necessary to include every instance of similar versions; I just thought that the rejoinder from the second officer in Molina’s version was more meaningful than German’s simple “Yep.

    2. It was also a quote from a military officer who attended.

  2. What I can’t figure out is why Hegseth would even get involved in Wounded Knee. Is this some sort of MAGA priority? It’s even more weird than usual

    1. The decision to un-award the medals was fairly recent and probably a reminder that decent behavior is “woke” and won’t be tolerated.

      1. Pretty much. It has less to do with Wounded Knee and more to do with “wokeness” not being tolerated.

    2. MAGA virtue signaling, just like switching all the army bases back to their old Confederate names.

  3. Both of Hegseth’s Bronze Stars were for meritorious service, rather than for combat valor.

    1. My two sons, both Iraqi war vets, viewed Bronze Stars as participation trophies.

      1. A pity. I’ve heard of those medals being handed out on that level, but a guy a year ahead of me in high school came back from Vietnam with three of them and three matching Purple Hearts, and the citations were like something out of an action movie. Can’t ask him about them now because he died of Agent Orange exposure.

  4. Funny how wearing surgical masks to prevent the spread of disease is “evil” and “a violation of our rights” but armed thugs hiding themselves like criminals and terrorists is suddenly okay.

    Gotta love that GOP ethos…

  5. The shaving policy also deters American Sikhs. Sikhs value military service, but their religion requires unshaven beards, and that’s a near-automatic non-starter for the American military. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikhs_in_the_United_States_military

    As for the featured speakers, I’m not convinced they’re the right people to espouse a “meritocracy” policy for the military. Aren’t there more qualified people for Secretary of Defense and the Presidency?

    1. There were more qualified people but that would’ve involved voting for the woman, and she cackled dontcha know.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.