Comic Strip of the Day Editorial cartooning Television

CSotD: Errors and Commissions

Parodies of official seals are a standard tool in the cartoonist’s magic box, but they can be hit-or-miss. Boris nails this one largely because the purpose of the FCC is so at odds with its current execution, so the irony of its malfeasance is striking and mockery of it is darkly humorous.

Today’s headline is a real estate reference to “Errors and Omissions,” a type of insurance against problems in the required disclosure of potential problems with a property, such as a sagging basement wall which may not be an immediate crisis but suggests a failing foundation.

However, what’s going on now is “Errors and Commissions” because it seem unlikely that the problems surfacing were not intentional. An error of omission can be forgivable, so long as it is remedied upon discovery, but an error of commission is far more serious because it suggests purposeful fraud.

What we have here is a failure to communicate, but when you’re in the communication business, you’re expected to have a level of expertise in which errors are not accidental.

The growing discomfort with Kash Patel heading the FBI may have more to do with incompetence and lack of experience than with purposeful deception on his part, but it certainly raises questions about how he was chosen for the position and then confirmed by the Senate.

He has some relevant experience, but it’s hard to argue that he had enough background to justify putting him in such a lofty position. Looking at the president’s cabinet, however, it seems obvious that loyalty and friendship are valued above expertise, and both Patel and his deputy, talk show host Dan Bongino seem overmatched in their current jobs.

Two Bulls picks up on a specific personality issue that raises questions about Patel’s appropriateness for the position. I was never a crime reporter per se, but as a reporter and editor at small papers, I was called upon to report on drug busts, fraud arrests, a bank robbery, a murder and a fatal encounter between authorities and a fugitive.

The police involved are not typically loose-lipped, and unlikely to tip their hand until they have everything lined up and nailed down.

This sometimes led to humor when reporters asked questions the cops obviously weren’t going to answer, but it also led to more serious clashes when police and press differed on what the public had a right to know.

What it didn’t lead to was the sort of Keystone Kops situation in which Patel announced, and then had to un-announce arrests that seemed, in retrospect, more like the questioning of a person of interest or possibly just a potential witness.

One thing you should absolutely positively never ever do is make a reporter curious, because that’s when they stop just writing down your quotes and reach, instead, for their flashlight and shovel. When you lose their trust and confidence, they start end-running you and you’ve lost control of the investigation.

I would suggest that, between the confusion Two Bulls mocks and the jaw-dropping dog-and-pony-show of Patel’s recent appearance before Congress, the words “trust” and “Kash Patel” don’t belong in the same sentence, and, in a more competence-based government, he’d have decided by now to spend more time with his family, with a shoeprint on the back of his trousers.

But, of course, we’re currently living a world of loyalty, not a world of competence, a world of appearances rather than a world of accomplishments.

As the Smothers Brothers sang well before Kristi Noem joined the government, “If you get an outfit, you can be a cowboy, too.”

While to reference a current observation on our politics, they may be clowns, but they’re clowns with flamethrowers.

Several cartoons have shown a king disposing of a jester, but it should be remembered that the court jester was traditionally somewhat untouchable, and, as in King Lear, served as something of a check upon the king, permitted to tease him and keep him from becoming too full of his own majesty.

That doesn’t make Bagley’s cartoon less accurate. Rather, it emphasizes how Trump has defied that tradition and demands flattery even of the fools who should be reminding him of his own mortality and imperfections, which we assume his courtiers will not

Juxtaposition of the Day

There’s something of a time-lapse connection between this pair: Opportunities may be opening up for new voices, but they’d better be careful, because the notion of a comedian who conforms seems like an oxymoron: Venables prompts the set-up and Bennett delivers the spike, and the message is that a comedian who doesn’t provide laughs gets fired, while a comedian who does also gets fired.

Byrnes suggests that the values modeled in government-approved media will begin to show up in our daily life, as we adapt to a country where you can advocate murder without losing your job but dare not suggest that a government policy seems insensitive.

Telnaes is likely safe, since people without humor, insight or creativity will likely miss her sarcasm, while the rest of us get a laugh.

John-John, BTW, was not really saluting his dead father but had been taught to salute the flag, and there was one covering the casket.

Unconscious reflexive patriotism is a perfect encapsulation of the moment.

Meanwhile, the “Greatest Generation” style of thoughtful patriotism that involved personal sacrifice is gone. Heel spurs are in, trench foot is out and fighting fascism is not just unpatriotic but criminal.

And Kal had better watch his step, because Jimmy Kimmel lost his job for suggesting that the administration was putting too much energy into blaming leftwing extremists while ignoring those on the right.

Truth may be a positive defense to accusations of slander, but facts won’t get you off the hook for making powerful people angry, and, if you lose a broadcasting job, you may be out of luck.

The FCC had rules limiting the number of stations a company could own, which included dominating a local market with more than one influential TV channel. But that was then. This is now.

In a plutocracy, oligarchs control information and being fired in one town may mean being persona non grata everywhere.

Previous Post
Recognize! I’ve Seen That Before – Updated
Next Post
Stuff and Nonsense, Comic Strip Week in Review

Comments 14

  1. Am I the only one who remembers public school back in the 50’s and 60’s, when we were taught censorship was UnAmerican and something only practiced by those Godless Commies? (Nazi’s were never mentioned because just about every one of us had a father or uncle with a bit too vivid memories of those people. Besides, they were defeated and would never come back again.)

    1. But now we have a vice president who thinks the Germans should welcome them back—and tells them that.

    2. I was raised in the 70’s to have a good work ethic and that my actions have consequences. Kimmel was suspended for violating his employer’s standard of conduct…nothing to do with censorship. Kirk was brutally murdered for rationally debating his point of view.

      1. Once more, you are in violation of Moynihan’s Law, which states ‘You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.’

        We don’t know why an apparent madman shot Charlie Kirk and it’s foolish to pretend otherwise. Wait for the trial and see if he testifies and if so if he provides a coherent explanation.

        But that pales next to your claim that Kimmel violated his employer’s standard of conduct, which is absolute nonsense. I’ll apologize when you provide a copy of that document in which Kimmel was told not to tell political jokes, or not to tell jokes on a specific topic or not to tell jokes critical of Donald J. Trump.

        Until then, stick to the facts or stay in the spam file.

  2. “Telnaes is likely safe, since people without humor, insight or creativity will likely miss her sarcasm, while the rest of us get a laugh.”

    It wasn’t just a laugh, it was a spit-take. Absolutely marvelous satire.

    1. Of course, Donald went golfing instead of going to the Kirk send-off, so the cartoon was, if anything, more flattering to Donald than the reality.

  3. How much of dt liking Patel is thanks to Patel’s childrens’s book series that rewrites history, the Plot against the King, complete with good King Donald? Yipes, it is even available at Amazon.

  4. soon coming to a new fascist regime near you! get your your LOYALTY CARDS or get a nice room with a view at the new and improved concentration camps!

  5. I’m a bit surprised at KAL’s both-sides-ism in his cartoon.

    Not saying that left wing violence is non-existent, but the numbers show that it isn’t anything like what we see coming out of the right.

    To include Charlie Kirk.

    When it isn’t out-and-out right wing violence (Charlottesville, J6 &ç), it usually appears to be a lone wolf, and usually a very confused lone wolf.

    1. I saw that and gave it a second thought, not wanting to start a contest of who was doing what. But I decided the point had more to do with Trump’s premature declaration of guilt than it did with who was more likely. As Kal indicates, he didn’t even consider a second possibility because he had already decided who he wanted to pin it on, facts being secondary. But it did require some thought.

      My own surmise is that the guy is nuts regardless of left or right. When people from strict backgrounds rebel, it doesn’t always explode in a logically consistent direction. But we’ll see.

    2. yeah the left wing monster should have been smaller, definitely.

  6. I do not believe Patel is incompetent, at least not incompetent enough to complete the mission assigned to him.

    Which is, replacing a professional law enforcement organization with one that is an enforcement organization weaponized to attack/enforce Trump’s will against his enemies. His first action was to fire the most senior FBI agents.

    Yeah, Patel is incompetent to run a professional organization, but that’s not why he is there.

    All Trump appointments have similar missions.

  7. RE: Meanwhile, the “Greatest Generation” style of thoughtful patriotism that involved personal sacrifice is gone. Heel spurs are in, trench foot is out and fighting fascism is not just unpatriotic but criminal.

    Remember, in Star Wars the Galactic Empire very much considered the Rebel Alliance to be “terrorists” while at the same time constructing their own WMD intended primarily to inspire terror.

    Freedom fighters will always be labeled “terrorists” by those who seek to control others and maintain their power, ironically by doing whatever they can to keep those beneath them living in fear and subjugation.

    1. There’s a flashback — in the anti-war days, we used to respond to the “terrorist” label by pointing out that George Washington was considered a terrorist in the king’s eyes.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.