Comic Strip of the Day Editorial cartooning

CSotD: Potpourri for 60, Art

Back in the days when Art Fleming hosted, Jeopardy had a category called “Potpourri” which mostly consisted of leftovers from previous games. Since they no longer use it, I will.

If Molina had run this earlier, I’d have used it with yesterday’s critique of Michael Ramirez’s anti-wind cartoon. But I still like it, because he focuses on the role of the petroleum industry in both polluting the atmosphere and in funding opposition to alternative energy sources.

I covered a public meeting in Maine about a set of turbines proposed for a ridge in a lightly populated area north of Rangeley. There were several NIMBY protesters there, but also, besides the TransCanada people who wanted to build the things, representatives from the Audubon Society who said stories of bird deaths were greatly exaggerated and the threat is not real.

I once drove up to a turbine on a farm and shut off my engine to listen. I heard no wop-wop-wop and there wasn’t a single bird carcass to be seen. That’s hardly a statistically significant sample, but I’m going with the Audubon Society, not the petroleum lobby.

I also had this Megan Herbert piece, which didn’t quite fit the argument but cracked me up anyway. I remember when wind first came on the scene and they had to quickly craft laws to keep people from erecting towers in their backyards such that, if they collapsed, would smash neighboring fences and possibly houses.

I also suspect that, even if you could erect a turbine, you’d have to live to 150 for the savings to pay it off. However, I know a lot of people who do well with solar panels, particularly since the government used to offer rebates and tax incentives to help clear the air and lower our dependence on fossil fuels.

The current administration has stopped the incentives. I can’t imagine the rea$on.

I didn’t have room for this in my discussion of the Epstein scandal, but it suggests a reason Trump hasn’t kept his promise to release the files.

It also reminds me of earlier Internet days, when the government started releasing documents with blacked-over redacted information, but didn’t know you have to flatten the file to make the move effective. Anyone with even prehistoric Photoshop could simply remove that layer and read to their heart’s content.

They did eventually more or less figure out how the series of tubes worked.

Juxtaposition of the Day

The UK has instituted age restrictions on the Intertubes, and Australia is on the brink of keeping everyone under the age of 16 from accessing the online world.

Blower criticizes it from a free speech/free press perspective, while First Dog points out how little it’s likely to work. I firmly believe that parents should limit their kids’ screen time, but that does seem like something that will only happen in homes where parents are already attentive and kids are raised sensibly.

Even in the Old Days, you could forbid your kids to watch violent and misogynistic stuff, but then they’d go off to school and mingle with friends who swam in that garbage, which reminds me of this classic Boondocks, one of my favorites.

As a parent, I didn’t fool myself into thinking I could keep my kids from seeing violent, sexist garbage, but at least they’d watch it knowing I objected.

You can’t compel behavior but you can impose values.

The recent decision by the IRS to allow churches to endorse candidates without losing their non-profit tax status drew this condemnation from Joe Heller. I’m considerably more ambivalent.

It strikes me that the IRS is not equipped to sneak agents into every little crossroads church and make sure they aren’t endorsing candidates or ballot proposals, and I’d rather they sent them to examine the books of major corporations and fatcats.

I’d also suggest that if little crossroads churches had to pay taxes, their operating costs and charitable outreach would pretty much negate their tax obligations.

But there’s also this: Much as you may hate conservative firebrand preachers, did you feel like that about Ralph Abernathy and Martin Luther King when they were using their pulpits to organize boycotts and voter registration drives and other political elements of the Civil Rights Movement?

Maybe they were careful to avoid specific instructions on voting. I don’t know that any black pastor in Mississippi ever said “Don’t vote for Ross Barnett,” but then I don’t know that any black pastor worth his salt would have had to.

Whole thing is a head-scratcher to me.

Here’s another head-scratcher: How the world economy can adjust to a goofball who doesn’t understand how tariffs work or what constitutes a trade imbalance and, as Bennett suggests, just throws darts at a map to determine who gets what.

I had to make sure Heard and McDonald islands weren’t where that 15% tariff at bottom left had stuck, which they aren’t. They’re the islands inhabited by seals and penguins that Trump tariffed and that his obedient Commerce Secretary Howard Nudnik defended.

Good News: I’m starting to see media using the term “import tax” in place of “tariff,” which does a better job of explaining who pays these things, which mightn’t be necessary if Dear Leader knew the answer himself.

I’d feel better about our economy if I thought he was deliberately lying and had some cunning plan up his sleeve, but, if so, he’s convincing in his pretense of being totally inept.

Which leads to …

That’s a good question. I can’t tell how much of Dear Leader’s astonishing, contradictory, nonsensical statements are intentional bafflegab to con the pigeons and how much of it is compulsive lying.

Whether Trump believes his followers are stupid seems irrelevant. He thinks he’s smarter than everyone else, and he seems to believe his own stories, even when they contradict each other.

A compulsive liar who claims to have been an outstanding athlete in high school or to have graduated from college with honors may believe it himself.

Still, before anyone invokes the 25th Amendment, let’s make sure JD knows he never really was a hillbilly.

Never mind. At least Buck was no phony. Even his jokes rang true.

Previous Post
Misc. Monday Memoranda – Comic Strip Department
Next Post
Are Cartoonists Journalists? aka: Is a Barnacle a Ship?

Comments 9

  1. We have windmills and roadways around here, and I find more dead birds along the latter than under the former.

  2. “I firmly believe that parents should limit their kids’ screen time, but that does seem like something that will only happen in homes where parents are already attentive and kids are raised sensibly.”

    Parent myself and I have always thought the panic around screen time was the equivalent of the panic around comic books in the 50’s

    https://historyfacts.com/arts-culture/fact/comic-books-were-considered-a-national-threat/

    Sure there are some (comics books/websites) that are a problem but the attitude that you have to limit screen time is similar to the “burn the comic books” screed. Kids need to understand media literacy and have opportunities to do other things but if their inclination leans towards screens you are just punishing them for something they like.

  3. For 12 year olds, maybe the analogy holds. But there are three-year-olds glued to screens, and three-year-olds shouldn’t be glued to anything. As for teens, they need to sleep at night, not lie there waking up every time somebody pings them with an IM about what Robby said about Lindsey. And they don’t need, as First Dog notes, to be watching terrorists beheading infidels IRL or, as I’d add, people being sexually assaulted.

    Even in the days before comics codes, there was nothing like what is online, and comics were only so many pages long — they didn’t command hours upon hours of anyone’s attention.

    This is a far different matter.

    1. Not to mention all the dark patterns employed.

      I was recently observing my nephew (7) watch youtube. As soon as his dad left the room, he’d stop the dad approved video, and switch to something dad did not want him watching. Top 10 videos that only had 9 items, so you’d click to the next one hoping to get the last item. Completely insane videos that you’d watch just to try to make sense of it. There was probably one video in ten that was actually amusing; the rest were just clickbait. And he’s already swallowed the bait.

      I observed for a while, but had to start “You know your dad doesn’t want you watching this” because these videos are literally addictive.

  4. The number and diversity of birds has been plummeting in recent decades. Insects, too, but to an even greater extent. Scientists have written extensively about this, and occasionally it finds its way into our news. The world that humans knew just 100 years ago is coming to an end. It frightens us, so we grasp for easier explanations, like, “the cats are eating all the birds”, and if we’re really blind, deaf and DUMB “the windmills are killing all the birds”, which sounds suspiciously like “”they’re eating the cats, they’re eating the dogs, the windmills cause cancer, they’re killing the whales”.
    I too have gone to stand beneath windmills without finding heaps of dead birds. I also have a cat, who occasionally kills a bird, but nowhere nearly as many as kill themselves by crashing into our windows, the reflection in which looks to them like just more sky to fly through.
    If we were to be honest we would would just shorten the whole sad story to “Humans kill or degrade the birds, insects, game animals, domestic livestock, wild animals, sea life, each other, practically everything in the natural world.” But that makes us feel guilty, and we can’t live with that. Easier to blame cats and windmills than habitat degradation and destruction, pesticide use, climate change, and so many other results of human activity, and the endless mantra, “We must have more economic growth.”

  5. “I love the poorly educated.”

    — Donald J. Trump, Feb. 24, 2016

    Even that statement is dubious. He certainly loves *their votes,* sure, but it’s incredibly unlikely that he actually loves *them.*

  6. The Idiot-In-Chief is totally odious, as are his fawning toadies. Hoping the MAGA followers truly once and for all WAKE UP forever, but I’m not holding my breath. Even so, I pray fervently that the HIGHEST AUTHORITY will take care of him in the most delightful way. Join me in prayer, my brethren! The fervent, effectual prayer of a righteous man availeth much. This was never more true than it is today.

    1. Thanks for the update. I haven’t watched it years. Ending the five-day limit was a bad move and I’m getting too old to answer the pop culture questions. (Which means I’m out of barroom trivia as well. To me, trivia is what happened before about 1965.)

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.