Comic Strip of the Day Editorial cartooning

CSotD: Encouraging Messages, Stony Ground

Luckovich poses an important question: What’s so bad about being woke? Or, grammatically, “awakened” or “awoke” but let’s hope at least one?

By illustrating the opposite, he somewhat answers the question, but it should be noted that the popular slang term wouldn’t exist if it weren’t a protest against and rebuke of those who either don’t get it or don’t care.

Ay, there’s the rub! He’s right to criticize the Trump administration for its lack of wokeness, its lack of attention to things that matter, its lack of interest in the common good.

But if people were consistent and well-intentioned, there’d be no need to fret over such things.

As it is, however, we can and should complain about people who claim to be Christians but exhibit no trace of the values that Christ preached.

But to be realistic, if people were naturally inclined to goodness, Christ wouldn’t have had to point out their faults and shortcomings, while, if his message had gotten through, we’d scratch our heads over his stories of the Good Samaritan and the sower of seeds and the workers in the grape arbors, because we wouldn’t be able to picture anyone behaving that way.

And we’d be puzzled by his condemnation of whited sepulchers for the same reason: We’d wonder what he was even speaking of?

The real question, then, is “Why all the surprise?”

Perhaps what is unusual about our world and our experience is the two or three remarkable decades after World War II. Shocked by the atrocities of the Axis nations and also awakened by the admittedly limited but real mingling of races that took place in our armed forces and in the factories back home, we went on a spree of decent behavior.

However, 49% of American voters have now selected the collection of leaders in Luckovich’s panels.

I don’t like to be a downer, but I won’t minimize my own despair. Having grown up and lived most of my life in that interlude of human decency, I’m sorry to see it come to an end.

But having studied history, I realize that what we are currently experiencing is, if not the default, at least nothing new.

The Bible tells of God despairing of the wickedness of mankind, and hitting the reset button with a great flood to wipe out everyone but Noah and his righteous family. In that story, which is folklore rather than history, God promises not to do it again.

Instead, despite a series of avatars reminding us of how we ought to behave, we’re on our own, and often the words of the avatars, like sown seeds, fall on stony ground and fail to germinate.

There are, at the moment, some cracks in the evil empire, and I’m glad to see them, but I start the day with this depressing message because we ought not to expect a few cracks to set things right.

At least not without a great deal of effort from those who want real change.

Still, it’s fun to see the sunshine peek through the thunderclouds, and we may rejoice, as long as we, ourselves, remain awake, awakened and woke.

A compensation for the elevation of incompetent people is that, when placed in positions of power, they have a prodigious talent for screwing up, and Pam Bondi has fouled up what may have been an impossible task in the first place:

Take a man who has cheated on multiple wives, bragged of grabbing women’s privates, burst into dressing rooms full of underage young women, been convicted of sexual assault, and boasted of his friendship with a known trafficker and rapist of teenaged girls, and portray him as an innocent man.

It could work, because he leads a cult and they are apt to believe in him no matter what.

Howsoever, he has encouraged a substantial subset of his cult to believe his opponents are pedophiles who perform unspeakable acts in the non-existent basement of a pizza parlor, and so “pedophile” has become one of their favorite insults and accusations.

Now, having taught them to attack and despise pedophiles, Bondi has to convince them that the close personal friend of America’s most notorious pedophile never joined him in any untoward activities.

And not only did Dear Leader suggest that he would release the files, but his son insisted on it. Yet despite Bondi denying that the files contain anything incriminating, she says she isn’t going to release them.

Does anybody on either side of the aisle believe Bondi’s explanation that there are thousands of videos of underage girls being sexually assaulted, but Epstein is the only man seen in any of them?

Half the country wouldn’t believe it in the first place. Now we’ll find out how many of the other half can’t believe it either.

If Epstein wasn’t Donald Trump’s best friend, perhaps Elon Musk was, but Musk said Trump was in the files, before saying that he shouldn’t have said anything about it.

Now he’s starting a rival political party.

Danziger is unimpressed and suggests that, however much money Musk may expend in promoting his party, his target audience won’t be impressed either.

The ever-loyal Benson declares that the GOP is also unimpressed, though she specifies that Musk’s party is a rat, which avoids summoning the well-known myth about elephants being afraid of mice.

Sort of. We’ll see.

Ross Perot failed to win a single state in 1992, while when George Wallace ran a third party candidacy in 1968, he picked up 14% of the vote but Richard Nixon still handily beat Hubert Humphrey.

And if Perot handed Clinton the presidency by nibbling away at (incumbent) GHWB’s vote, note that it wouldn’t take much to derail Trump’s successor, given how close the vote was in 2024.

A third party could be a monkey-wrench in 2028, but much could also depend on candidates giving up on fear-mongering and on wonkish policy arguments, and, instead, plainly addressing the true concerns of the 99-percent who will, by then, likely be hammered by cost of living increases, loss of health care and a failing economy.

Ed Stein drew this cartoon in 2011. Hasn’t anybody learned anything in the years since?

Previous Post
Editorial Ecclesiastes
Next Post
The 2025 Green Eyeshade Award Goes to Robert L. Ariail

Comments 20

  1. Did you mean to say the 99% in you conclusion? I don’t think the the 1% are going to suffer anytime soon.

  2. Hey, I’m lucky to get grammar right at this hour. I don’t do math! Thx, fixed.

  3. As long as we have the Electoral College, it’s going to be a two party race. Period.

    1. Can you show your reasoning? I just re-read the twelfth amendment, and I don’t see a bar to a third party, or an independent, getting a majority of the votes. Admittedly, ‘twould be more difficult if the House of Representatives chooses the President.

    2. Al Gore might disagree, George, but Ralph Nader would thank you for letting him off the hook.

      1. Ralph Nader’s mere 97,000 votes in the Florida 2000 presidential election was dwarfed by the 300,000 REGISTERED DEMOCRATS who voted for Bush.

        Blaming Nader for Gore’s loss is factually baseless.

        Who’s interest is in in that this story became ‘blame Nader’ rather than ‘blame the DNC for refusing to address the issues that working-people care about?

        We all know who was trying real hard to not let folks like Jim Hightower tell the ‘rest of the story’…
        https://www.salon.com/2000/11/28/hightower/

      2. Nader got 97,488 votes in Florida and Bush won the state by 537 votes.

      3. 537 votes — according to Scalia.

        Nader wasn’t the only problem.

      4. All this is why I didn’t mention Nader in my initial remarks about third party candidates.

  4. What many people don’t think about (or acknowledge?) is that with a 3-party race, it’s possible for someone to win with only 34% of the vote. And even if the outcome isn’t that close, the “winner” is still likely to win with less than half the vote — meaning more people voted for someone else than for the winner.

    1. This, unfortunately, is standard in most Canadian elections.

    2. Four times since the founding of the Republican Party (twice in the lifetime of many of us), the GOP candidate has won the presidency despite winning fewer popular votes than the Democrat. In that time, Democrats have never accomplished that feat. Under our electoral college system, a presidential candidate could eke out wins in all the “red” states (if you include all of Dixie) plus Wisconsin, Michigan, or Pennsylvania, and be elected president without getting a single vote anywhere else.

      Had George Wallace’s American Party been successful, we could have had a complete Balkanization of the Electoral College by now.

  5. Is it wrong to wish that in the upcoming “hurricane season” (someone explain what that period to the action FEMA director) one of the major storms smashes into Florida right into Mar-a-Lago, including the golf course, but skipping most of innocent Palm Beach in the process? If it is, I’ll risk it.

    1. Yes, it is. But, like the old song, if disliking Trump is wrong, I don’t wanna be right.

  6. That’s why ranked choice voting is the answer.

    1. An easier answer is for States to switch from winner-takes-all to each Congressional district getting its own Elector, like in Maine and Nebraska.

  7. You left out Ralph Nader in 2000. Had he not run as an independent, Gore would have won.

  8. Cracks in MAGA? “There’s a crack, a crack in everything. That’s how the light gets in.”

    Anthem, Leonard Cohen

  9. Once again you neatly sum up why I no longer consider myself Christian, because “Christian” doesn’t mean what it used to.

    Not that I’m sure it ever did.

    They say atheists and non-believers are the ones without morals, but if there truly is no god then it’s up to us to treat each other right.

  10. Epstein files? Someone should just ask Ghislaine Maxwell; I’m surprised that no one has brought this up anywhere that I’ve seen.

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.