<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Mag posts top 10 editorial cartoons of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2009/12/11/time-mag-posts-top-10-editorial-cartoons-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2009/12/11/time-mag-posts-top-10-editorial-cartoons-of-2009/</link>
	<description>The source for industry news for the professional cartoonist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Rall</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2009/12/11/time-mag-posts-top-10-editorial-cartoons-of-2009/#comment-88999</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Rall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6032#comment-88999</guid>
		<description>An excellent question, Mike, and the answer is yes.

Anyone who knows me knows that I don&#039;t discriminate based on political orientation. One of my disappointments in the ATTITUDE series was that (a) there are next to no decent right-wing altie cartoonists and (b) the few there were don&#039;t seem to answer email. 

Some of my favorite cartoonists are right-wingers: Chuck Asay, Scott Stantis, Mike Lester, etc. I&#039;ll definitely want their work in there. 

Overall, I&#039;m going to invite ALL editorial cartoonists to send in their hardest-hitting work. Even cartoonists who do a lot of mainstream work do stuff that&#039;s edgy (and doesn&#039;t make Time or USA Today). I want that stuff in there. 

I remember when I first looked at BECY back in the &#039;70s and &#039;80s, I wasn&#039;t aware of the fact that it so poorly represented the work being done in newspapers. All I knew was, if this was what editorial cartooning was, it wasn&#039;t very good. If there had been another book that contained great cartoons by people like Jules Feiffer, I would have bought that in a heartbeat.

People into political cartoons prefer the ass-kicking ones, not the milquetoast pap that runs in these anthologies. 

Thanks, Stephen Beals! This is going to be awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent question, Mike, and the answer is yes.</p>
<p>Anyone who knows me knows that I don&#8217;t discriminate based on political orientation. One of my disappointments in the ATTITUDE series was that (a) there are next to no decent right-wing altie cartoonists and (b) the few there were don&#8217;t seem to answer email. </p>
<p>Some of my favorite cartoonists are right-wingers: Chuck Asay, Scott Stantis, Mike Lester, etc. I&#8217;ll definitely want their work in there. </p>
<p>Overall, I&#8217;m going to invite ALL editorial cartoonists to send in their hardest-hitting work. Even cartoonists who do a lot of mainstream work do stuff that&#8217;s edgy (and doesn&#8217;t make Time or USA Today). I want that stuff in there. </p>
<p>I remember when I first looked at BECY back in the &#8217;70s and &#8217;80s, I wasn&#8217;t aware of the fact that it so poorly represented the work being done in newspapers. All I knew was, if this was what editorial cartooning was, it wasn&#8217;t very good. If there had been another book that contained great cartoons by people like Jules Feiffer, I would have bought that in a heartbeat.</p>
<p>People into political cartoons prefer the ass-kicking ones, not the milquetoast pap that runs in these anthologies. </p>
<p>Thanks, Stephen Beals! This is going to be awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Peterson</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2009/12/11/time-mag-posts-top-10-editorial-cartoons-of-2009/#comment-88996</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6032#comment-88996</guid>
		<description>So, when you say &quot;edgy,&quot; Ted, will it include both edges? Glenn McCoy as well as Ted Rall, Chuck Asay as well as Matt Bors, Ken Catalino as well as Jen Sorensen?

Serious question. I probably wouldn&#039;t buy one that only represented one &quot;edge&quot; and I&#039;m pretty sure you&#039;d get more MSM boost from one that showed both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, when you say &#8220;edgy,&#8221; Ted, will it include both edges? Glenn McCoy as well as Ted Rall, Chuck Asay as well as Matt Bors, Ken Catalino as well as Jen Sorensen?</p>
<p>Serious question. I probably wouldn&#8217;t buy one that only represented one &#8220;edge&#8221; and I&#8217;m pretty sure you&#8217;d get more MSM boost from one that showed both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Rall</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2009/12/11/time-mag-posts-top-10-editorial-cartoons-of-2009/#comment-88987</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Rall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6032#comment-88987</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m totally doing this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally doing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Peterson</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2009/12/11/time-mag-posts-top-10-editorial-cartoons-of-2009/#comment-88986</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 12:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6032#comment-88986</guid>
		<description>At the risk of raising the hated E-word, collections are one time when exposure has value. You&#039;re putting your work in front of readers who have shown a willingness to spend money, but perhaps on a genre (editorial cartoons) or because they recognize and like certain artists (but haven&#039;t seen you.).

In order for this to work, of course, you have to have your own product waiting in the wings and you have to make sure that reader who was charmed by your work knows about it. 

So if there were an annual collection, priced low enough to encourage casual readers but with some cost to show commitment by those readers, and if it were well-promoted so that readers didn&#039;t have to be fanatics to find it, and if it displayed web addresses for each cartoonist, and if each of those cartoonists then updated their web sites with fresh material and the chance to buy their wonderful individual collections, it would be worth doing.

Alternatively, you could sit around and wait for all that to happen on its own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of raising the hated E-word, collections are one time when exposure has value. You&#8217;re putting your work in front of readers who have shown a willingness to spend money, but perhaps on a genre (editorial cartoons) or because they recognize and like certain artists (but haven&#8217;t seen you.).</p>
<p>In order for this to work, of course, you have to have your own product waiting in the wings and you have to make sure that reader who was charmed by your work knows about it. </p>
<p>So if there were an annual collection, priced low enough to encourage casual readers but with some cost to show commitment by those readers, and if it were well-promoted so that readers didn&#8217;t have to be fanatics to find it, and if it displayed web addresses for each cartoonist, and if each of those cartoonists then updated their web sites with fresh material and the chance to buy their wonderful individual collections, it would be worth doing.</p>
<p>Alternatively, you could sit around and wait for all that to happen on its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Rall</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2009/12/11/time-mag-posts-top-10-editorial-cartoons-of-2009/#comment-88984</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Rall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6032#comment-88984</guid>
		<description>Alas, the royalty structure for ebooks spells disaster for authors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, the royalty structure for ebooks spells disaster for authors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wood</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2009/12/11/time-mag-posts-top-10-editorial-cartoons-of-2009/#comment-88982</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6032#comment-88982</guid>
		<description>An ebook might have limited distribution today, but the time is coming when a few Kindles, Nooks, or iSlates are what are scattered about the coffee table. Or the coffee table top itself is interactive. An eCalendar cartoon a day could work then too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An ebook might have limited distribution today, but the time is coming when a few Kindles, Nooks, or iSlates are what are scattered about the coffee table. Or the coffee table top itself is interactive. An eCalendar cartoon a day could work then too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Diesslin</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2009/12/11/time-mag-posts-top-10-editorial-cartoons-of-2009/#comment-88966</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Diesslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 01:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6032#comment-88966</guid>
		<description>There ya go. Hope it goes well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There ya go. Hope it goes well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Rall</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2009/12/11/time-mag-posts-top-10-editorial-cartoons-of-2009/#comment-88959</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Rall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6032#comment-88959</guid>
		<description>Wanna do something right? Do it yourself. And that&#039;s what I&#039;m going to do. I have a hunch readers will welcome an annual comp of edgy political cartoons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wanna do something right? Do it yourself. And that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m going to do. I have a hunch readers will welcome an annual comp of edgy political cartoons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Diesslin</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2009/12/11/time-mag-posts-top-10-editorial-cartoons-of-2009/#comment-88957</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Diesslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6032#comment-88957</guid>
		<description>Why would a cartoon collection fall into the category of civic responsibility? Well, rhetorical questions aside, I think it would neat if it were to happen. Maybe an agenda item for AAEC.

Could do one as an e-book, but I don&#039;t think an e-book would have the impact or reach as many.  I think the collection could very well end up in major bookstores given the folks and association that could be behind it.

Worst case, you might have enough for a cartoon-a-day calendar.

Then again, if some publisher picked it up (vs. self-publishing it) and you had to split proceeds umpty-squat ways, might not pan out.  How about proceeds going to AAEC first year just to test the water? Perhaps the real barrier is getting someone to organize it as well as sponsor it.

Alas, another seemingly good idea trampled to death before it even got started. ;(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would a cartoon collection fall into the category of civic responsibility? Well, rhetorical questions aside, I think it would neat if it were to happen. Maybe an agenda item for AAEC.</p>
<p>Could do one as an e-book, but I don&#8217;t think an e-book would have the impact or reach as many.  I think the collection could very well end up in major bookstores given the folks and association that could be behind it.</p>
<p>Worst case, you might have enough for a cartoon-a-day calendar.</p>
<p>Then again, if some publisher picked it up (vs. self-publishing it) and you had to split proceeds umpty-squat ways, might not pan out.  How about proceeds going to AAEC first year just to test the water? Perhaps the real barrier is getting someone to organize it as well as sponsor it.</p>
<p>Alas, another seemingly good idea trampled to death before it even got started. ;(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Rall</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2009/12/11/time-mag-posts-top-10-editorial-cartoons-of-2009/#comment-88946</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Rall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6032#comment-88946</guid>
		<description>Cool, please let me know what you think after you read them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, please let me know what you think after you read them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
