<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time reveals their top 10 editorial cartoons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/</link>
	<description>The source for industry news for the professional cartoonist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Bennett</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78403</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78403</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to thank Mike Peterson for the comments about my work. I really appreciate the generous critique.

I would correct Mike (or, more accurately, the salesman Mike quoted) on my marital status. I am not married to Ann Telnaes (a fact for which Ann is quite grateful, I&#039;m sure). I am, instead, the lucky husband of the beautiful and talented Cindy Procious- a former editorial cartoonist, now oil painter extraordinaire.

Clay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to thank Mike Peterson for the comments about my work. I really appreciate the generous critique.</p>
<p>I would correct Mike (or, more accurately, the salesman Mike quoted) on my marital status. I am not married to Ann Telnaes (a fact for which Ann is quite grateful, I&#8217;m sure). I am, instead, the lucky husband of the beautiful and talented Cindy Procious- a former editorial cartoonist, now oil painter extraordinaire.</p>
<p>Clay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wood</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78399</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78399</guid>
		<description>I just watched &#039;Christmas in Connecticut&#039; for the first time. Barbara Stanwyck. There&#039;s a well done scene where she&#039;s talking to the Bellamy character and a friend is serving her some food. Bellamy says something and the friend offers &#039;baloney&#039;. He&#039;s says something else, and the friend offers &#039;nuts&#039;. The whole movie is filled with that sort of dialogue. The scene in &#039;Casablanca&#039; where she is considering buying a scarf from a street vendor is filled with sexual innuendo of the worst sort, but it slips right by. Yeah, subversion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched &#8216;Christmas in Connecticut&#8217; for the first time. Barbara Stanwyck. There&#8217;s a well done scene where she&#8217;s talking to the Bellamy character and a friend is serving her some food. Bellamy says something and the friend offers &#8216;baloney&#8217;. He&#8217;s says something else, and the friend offers &#8216;nuts&#8217;. The whole movie is filled with that sort of dialogue. The scene in &#8216;Casablanca&#8217; where she is considering buying a scarf from a street vendor is filled with sexual innuendo of the worst sort, but it slips right by. Yeah, subversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiley Miller</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78398</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiley Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78398</guid>
		<description>â€œSubversion is fun and challenging. Once you get good at it youâ€™ll be surprised how much you can slip in.â€

Exactly the point I was trying to get across. This is the essence of creativity, as opposed to perceived security homogenized work that permeates the profession. It&#039;s this crutch of sameness that has helped lead to our own demise. Sorry if that upsets some folks here, but unless you face a problem, there&#039;s no hope of resolving it. And this problem has the entire art form on it&#039;s death bed, as far as traditional editorial cartooning goes. 

But political satire will, and is, finding alternative outlets. The trick is to be able to make a living at it in the same vein as we had in the past with newspapers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œSubversion is fun and challenging. Once you get good at it youâ€™ll be surprised how much you can slip in.â€</p>
<p>Exactly the point I was trying to get across. This is the essence of creativity, as opposed to perceived security homogenized work that permeates the profession. It&#8217;s this crutch of sameness that has helped lead to our own demise. Sorry if that upsets some folks here, but unless you face a problem, there&#8217;s no hope of resolving it. And this problem has the entire art form on it&#8217;s death bed, as far as traditional editorial cartooning goes. </p>
<p>But political satire will, and is, finding alternative outlets. The trick is to be able to make a living at it in the same vein as we had in the past with newspapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Peterson</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78397</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78397</guid>
		<description>&quot;Subversion is fun and challenging. Once you get good at it youâ€™ll be surprised how much you can slip in.&quot;

Clay Bennett&#039;s cartoons are among the wickedest in the art form because he doesn&#039;t go at his targets with an ax and he doesn&#039;t mistake rudeness or crudeness for &quot;honesty.&quot;

Part of it is style -- like Ann Telnaes, Bennett has a deceptively smooth style that doesn&#039;t shriek &quot;attitude,&quot; though of course her approach is far more direct and confrontational. But in both cases, you tend to approach those simple, smooth lines as if you were walking into a kid&#039;s cartoon.

(Incidentally, I was once at a national conference where a fellow selling educational material about political cartoons told me that Ann and Clay were married. This did not induce me to buy his product, but it certainly set me to dreaming about what their children would end up drawing.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Subversion is fun and challenging. Once you get good at it youâ€™ll be surprised how much you can slip in.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clay Bennett&#8217;s cartoons are among the wickedest in the art form because he doesn&#8217;t go at his targets with an ax and he doesn&#8217;t mistake rudeness or crudeness for &#8220;honesty.&#8221;</p>
<p>Part of it is style &#8212; like Ann Telnaes, Bennett has a deceptively smooth style that doesn&#8217;t shriek &#8220;attitude,&#8221; though of course her approach is far more direct and confrontational. But in both cases, you tend to approach those simple, smooth lines as if you were walking into a kid&#8217;s cartoon.</p>
<p>(Incidentally, I was once at a national conference where a fellow selling educational material about political cartoons told me that Ann and Clay were married. This did not induce me to buy his product, but it certainly set me to dreaming about what their children would end up drawing.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty Rohde</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78395</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty Rohde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78395</guid>
		<description>As others have stated financially the profession is nearly dead.  Creatively it might be at its strongest but what&#039;s the use if these artist can&#039;t find an audience or make a living doing it.

From my personal experience Mr. Wood is correct.  I do live caricature for a living.  Caricature is supposed to be an art form where you collect anatomical and personal details and create a drawing that summarizes these details.  Instead nearly everyone thinks caricatures are supposed to be cute cartoony drawings with big toothy grins.  You pick your battles and figure out how far you can take things.  If you have any desire to preserve your artistic integrity you learn to be subversive.  You learn to do drawings that look cute but still slip in some actual caricature.  If you fail to give people the cute crap they want you&#039;ll be financially hurting.  Especially now.

Similarly editors want cute entertaining crap.  Give them the crap they demand and slip things in.  Subversion is fun and challenging.  Once you get good at it you&#039;ll be surprised how much you can slip in.

The reason I dislike a lot of these entertainment oriented cartoonists is because they don&#039;t change.  Sloppy artwork and similar jokes.

Mr. Rall I respect you, and over the past few months I&#039;ve come to respect a lot of the cartoonists here.  I&#039;m politely posing this question to everyone, but specifically to Mr. Rall because of how he announced he should write Time magazine.  Honest to god aside from other cartoonists who cares what any of us think?  If enough people actually cared you wouldn&#039;t be in this situation creatively or financially in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As others have stated financially the profession is nearly dead.  Creatively it might be at its strongest but what&#8217;s the use if these artist can&#8217;t find an audience or make a living doing it.</p>
<p>From my personal experience Mr. Wood is correct.  I do live caricature for a living.  Caricature is supposed to be an art form where you collect anatomical and personal details and create a drawing that summarizes these details.  Instead nearly everyone thinks caricatures are supposed to be cute cartoony drawings with big toothy grins.  You pick your battles and figure out how far you can take things.  If you have any desire to preserve your artistic integrity you learn to be subversive.  You learn to do drawings that look cute but still slip in some actual caricature.  If you fail to give people the cute crap they want you&#8217;ll be financially hurting.  Especially now.</p>
<p>Similarly editors want cute entertaining crap.  Give them the crap they demand and slip things in.  Subversion is fun and challenging.  Once you get good at it you&#8217;ll be surprised how much you can slip in.</p>
<p>The reason I dislike a lot of these entertainment oriented cartoonists is because they don&#8217;t change.  Sloppy artwork and similar jokes.</p>
<p>Mr. Rall I respect you, and over the past few months I&#8217;ve come to respect a lot of the cartoonists here.  I&#8217;m politely posing this question to everyone, but specifically to Mr. Rall because of how he announced he should write Time magazine.  Honest to god aside from other cartoonists who cares what any of us think?  If enough people actually cared you wouldn&#8217;t be in this situation creatively or financially in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abell Smith</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78393</link>
		<dc:creator>Abell Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78393</guid>
		<description>Right... I agree, Ed... when I say &quot;editorial cartooning is fine,&quot; I don&#039;t mean monetarily.  Clearly we&#039;re facing serious challenges, along with every other group of content-providers.  What I mean is, we shouldn&#039;t be saying stuff like labels (or laziness) are &quot;killing the art form&quot; or mean that &quot;it deserves to die.&quot;  People are doing good work -- the art form is strong.  The mere fact that people care enough to criticize lazy work is proof of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right&#8230; I agree, Ed&#8230; when I say &#8220;editorial cartooning is fine,&#8221; I don&#8217;t mean monetarily.  Clearly we&#8217;re facing serious challenges, along with every other group of content-providers.  What I mean is, we shouldn&#8217;t be saying stuff like labels (or laziness) are &#8220;killing the art form&#8221; or mean that &#8220;it deserves to die.&#8221;  People are doing good work &#8212; the art form is strong.  The mere fact that people care enough to criticize lazy work is proof of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wood</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78390</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78390</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m doing animated editorial cartoons, so it might be different, but I think there&#039;s nothing wrong at all with being entertaining. Sullivan&#039;s Travels. 

I think whatever message there is should be slyly carried under the entertainment. Engage, entertain, THEN spread the meme.

Similarly, many of the movies made under the Hays Code had to hide the sex talk in clever dialogue, and were better for it. The racehorse discussion in Double Endemnity being a classic example.

This also reminds me of an interview with the lyricist for AC/DC wherein he claimed that their lyrics were more clever at hiding the sex talk than other less talented bands. Sink the Pink?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m doing animated editorial cartoons, so it might be different, but I think there&#8217;s nothing wrong at all with being entertaining. Sullivan&#8217;s Travels. </p>
<p>I think whatever message there is should be slyly carried under the entertainment. Engage, entertain, THEN spread the meme.</p>
<p>Similarly, many of the movies made under the Hays Code had to hide the sex talk in clever dialogue, and were better for it. The racehorse discussion in Double Endemnity being a classic example.</p>
<p>This also reminds me of an interview with the lyricist for AC/DC wherein he claimed that their lyrics were more clever at hiding the sex talk than other less talented bands. Sink the Pink?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Hall</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78389</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78389</guid>
		<description>&quot;Newspapers are dying. Magazines are dying. Editorial cartooning is fine.&quot;

This doesn&#039;t work, because the online paradigm and the support of advertisers has not been worked out yet.  The problem there is, the internet started out as an &quot;everything is free&quot; ideology.  And while it looks certain that everything is in fact moving online, until the advertising dollars are there, it just won&#039;t work. 

Unless you want to work for free - which I, for one, am not prepared to do.

If you work for a newspaper, freelance or full-time staff, don&#039;t kid yourself into believing that advertising dollars are not what pays you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Newspapers are dying. Magazines are dying. Editorial cartooning is fine.&#8221;</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t work, because the online paradigm and the support of advertisers has not been worked out yet.  The problem there is, the internet started out as an &#8220;everything is free&#8221; ideology.  And while it looks certain that everything is in fact moving online, until the advertising dollars are there, it just won&#8217;t work. </p>
<p>Unless you want to work for free &#8211; which I, for one, am not prepared to do.</p>
<p>If you work for a newspaper, freelance or full-time staff, don&#8217;t kid yourself into believing that advertising dollars are not what pays you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abell Smith</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78388</link>
		<dc:creator>Abell Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78388</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what bothers me about this whole &quot;DEATH OF EDITORIAL CARTOONING&quot; thing: has anyone stopped doing them (unless they&#039;re retiring or taking on a major change in career path)?  We really need to distinguish between what&#039;s going on in the newspaper/print industry with what&#039;s going on with the art form.  People are still drawing cartoons, and they&#039;re still talking about political/editorial issues in those cartoons.  And they&#039;re still going to try to get paid for doing those cartoons.  That&#039;s not going to change.

Newspapers are dying.  Magazines are dying.  Editorial cartooning is fine.  

Discussions about style and quality are good -- it keeps the art form fresh and relevant.

It&#039;s either this or we all go to business school ... (~shiver~)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what bothers me about this whole &#8220;DEATH OF EDITORIAL CARTOONING&#8221; thing: has anyone stopped doing them (unless they&#8217;re retiring or taking on a major change in career path)?  We really need to distinguish between what&#8217;s going on in the newspaper/print industry with what&#8217;s going on with the art form.  People are still drawing cartoons, and they&#8217;re still talking about political/editorial issues in those cartoons.  And they&#8217;re still going to try to get paid for doing those cartoons.  That&#8217;s not going to change.</p>
<p>Newspapers are dying.  Magazines are dying.  Editorial cartooning is fine.  </p>
<p>Discussions about style and quality are good &#8212; it keeps the art form fresh and relevant.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s either this or we all go to business school &#8230; (~shiver~)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cole</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78387</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2008/12/11/time-reveals-their-top-10-editorial-cartoons/#comment-78387</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a label: &quot;INSUFFERABLE SELF-RIGHTEOUS KNOW-IT-ALL.&quot;

Available in sizes petite through XXXL. Makes the perfect stocking stuffer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a label: &#8220;INSUFFERABLE SELF-RIGHTEOUS KNOW-IT-ALL.&#8221;</p>
<p>Available in sizes petite through XXXL. Makes the perfect stocking stuffer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
