Comments on: Wednesday’s Doonesbury places editors in tough spot

By: Monty Rohde

Monty Rohde — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:11:52 +0000

To Mr. Tredeau’s credit, he picked the winner correctly.

By: Wiley Miller

Wiley Miller — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:49:33 +0000

In the most recent Gallup poll that showed 90% are dissatisfied with the direction of the country, I wondered just who those 10% are that think things are going well and want to continue in the same direction. Thanks for letting me know, James.

I guess that makes 90% of the country smug liberals, I suppose. Or is it just those who are predicting Obama is going to win that are smug liberals? That would be nearly every political expert (pundit) in America today.

By: Rick Stromoski

Rick Stromoski — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:28:46 +0000

I’m smug and I like weenies with onion, mustard and after tomorrow, a liberal dose of shaedenfraude relish.

By: steve skelton

steve skelton — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:09:01 +0000

James, that’s all you got left. Name calling. Your party completely screwed this nation for the last 8 years and now you’re calling us names. Get a life.

By: Wiley Miller

Wiley Miller — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:05:01 +0000

“Smug liberal weenies” ? What makes Trudeau smug and/or a weenie?

By: James Middleton

James Middleton — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:50:49 +0000

I’d like to see McCain win, if for no other reason than to rub Trudeau’s and other smug liberal weenies’ nose in it…and to see what Oprah’s going to do with two days of celebratory shows plannned…

By: josh shalek

josh shalek — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:32:00 +0000

I’m surprised Trudeau isn’t backing Jack Tanner for ’08.

By: KRANKY (JOE RANK)

KRANKY (JOE RANK) — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:26:57 +0000

I recall one deadline where the congressional race was tooclosetocall, that had devolved into ridiculous ad hominem attacks by both candidates. I drew a ” AND THE WINNER IS…” of a figure covered in mud and preparing to throw more.

Year 2000 threw everyone for a loop. Although it provided alot of fodder, I look back at my work ( that was quite prolific on the subject ) and see that I got caught up in the narrative. There was so much that we did not know then. That is the main reason that I am apprehensive today. What stunts are going to be attempted? There are some really crazy theories concerning untraceable vote switching software that I do not automatically discount anymore as a crackpot conspiracy.

By: Wiley Miller

Wiley Miller — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:52:14 +0000

Apparently they (or anyone else) don’t recall that Bruce Tinsley proclaimed in Mallard Filmore that Kerry won in 2004. Of course, he was actually correct, but that’s another matter entirely. But it looks like Garry seems to believe that the republicans won’t be able to steal this election as they did the previous two.

Anyway, it’s much ado about nothing, as it is just a cartoon. But if he predicted a McCain victory due to rigged voting machines (which is the only way he’s going to win), then THAT would be a troublesome limb to climb out on.

By: Charles Brubaker

Charles Brubaker — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:22:29 +0000

Of course, some cartoonists can take note from what Bud Grace did a day after the 2004 election: by drawing Nader as the winner.