Comments on: Cartoonist Sparks Another Furor at University of Virginia

By: Dorothy Brooks

Dorothy Brooks — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:53:46 +0000

It always saddens me when Christians (like Keith Brayant) lump blacks, Jews and gays in one groups and Christians in the other. Why is it not possible to just comment on what is right or wrong (and judgments are possible? When writers or speakers denigrate blacks or Jews or make comments on the sinner and not the SIN, when discussing gays, then it is wrong. When they do the same concerning Christians it is wrong. And isn’t it odd that the cartoonists will go out on a limb when it comes to Christians but are rather reserved when it comes to Muslims. I wonder if self preservation kicks in?

By: Keith Bryant

Keith Bryant — Sat, 15 Sep 2007 07:29:02 +0000

While Woolard was dismissed for his “Ethiopian” cartoon, in the recent past he was given a free pass for his cartoons mocking the Catholic Church. It’s funny how the double standards run amok in todays society. If one attacks blacks, Jews and gays, their trial by media begins, (just ask Don Imus, Mel Gibson and Isaiah Washington). If one attacks Catholics (or any other Christian church), they’re applauded.

By: Caroline Choe

Caroline Choe — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:12:36 +0000

After seeing one of his “controversial” cartoons in his paper last year, I went to the cavalier daily and met with him. Grant is a kind, good-natured and clever cartoonist whose biting wit is usually targeted at culturally ignorant Americans who derive their personal opinions from generalized, untrue stereotypes. He seeks to portray their misinformed perspectives by illustrating them in his cartoons. It truly saddens me that he has received so much undue criticism from people who have completely miscontrued the point of his artwork.

By: Rich Diesslin

Rich Diesslin — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:14:11 +0000

Alan, they still teach journalism? Seems to me both the editor and the cartoonist should have seen that one as a bad idea … both are culpable … but both are college students right? I’m amazed it generated a sit-in … perhaps some professor who misses the ’60′s was behind that. ;)

By: Stacy Curtis

Stacy Curtis — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:59:35 +0000

Cartoonists DRAW cartoons, they don’t PUBLISH them.

Whoever the person is who decides what goes into the Cavalier Daily is the person responsible.

The editor was new? So what? Even a newbie could tell this cartoon was something that demanded closer attention.

By: Garey Mckee

Garey Mckee — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:37:55 +0000

While I admit that I don’t understand the reasoning for even creating such a cartoon, I have to ask the question:

Why is it always the cartoonist who gets in hot water over this crap, when it’s the EDITOR who should be making the final decision wether to run these cartoons or not?

You want to fire someone? FIRE THE EDITOR!

By: Matt Bors

Matt Bors — Thu, 06 Sep 2007 22:01:08 +0000

Seems like a risque gag cartoon as opposed to any political or social commentary, so I wonder why they ran it.

By: Dawn Douglass

Dawn Douglass — Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:43:11 +0000

I wish I knew the motivation behind this cartoon. Was he trying to draw attention to Ethopian famine in an effort to get more people interested in sending aid, or was he just making a poor joke at their expense???

By: Alan Gardner

Alan Gardner — Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:28:18 +0000

It was a new editor, but what I find interesting is that the editor was a linguist student. What? They couldn’t get a journalism major that perhaps had taken some classes what to and not to print?

By: Jeff Conner

Jeff Conner — Thu, 06 Sep 2007 18:36:51 +0000

This cartoonist has published THREE cartoons that have caused a national uproar? Methinks the editor-in-chief needs to start editing.