<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ted Rall and Michelle Malkin get into blogging tiff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/</link>
	<description>The source for industry news for the professional cartoonist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Gardner</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61526</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61526</guid>
		<description>And with that. Discussion closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And with that. Discussion closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Stromoski</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61525</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Stromoski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61525</guid>
		<description>DT&#039;s  and Dawn&#039;s ad hominem reponses just illustrate all of my points. It&#039;s a bullying tactic. They can&#039;t defend the policy ... either because they are smart enough to know that they are on shaky ground or can&#039;t articulate a coherent defense ... so they launch personal attacks on the critics and feign outrage in the hopes that the thread will derail. I&#039;m not sure how a group can discuss the merits of an inflamatory cartoon such as Ted&#039;s without discussing the politics behind it.

As for the cartoon, the color looks a little flat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DT&#8217;s  and Dawn&#8217;s ad hominem reponses just illustrate all of my points. It&#8217;s a bullying tactic. They can&#8217;t defend the policy &#8230; either because they are smart enough to know that they are on shaky ground or can&#8217;t articulate a coherent defense &#8230; so they launch personal attacks on the critics and feign outrage in the hopes that the thread will derail. I&#8217;m not sure how a group can discuss the merits of an inflamatory cartoon such as Ted&#8217;s without discussing the politics behind it.</p>
<p>As for the cartoon, the color looks a little flat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DT</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61524</link>
		<dc:creator>DT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61524</guid>
		<description>Josh,

There&#039;s Alan&#039;s tie in to the cartoon...same mindset as the misguided cartoon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh,</p>
<p>There&#8217;s Alan&#8217;s tie in to the cartoon&#8230;same mindset as the misguided cartoon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Gardner</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61523</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61523</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re seriously straying off course. Anyone else have anything to say about the cartoon itself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re seriously straying off course. Anyone else have anything to say about the cartoon itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshM</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61521</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61521</guid>
		<description>For some reason, my comments which accompanied the above quote weren&#039;t posted.  Here they are again:

Most military people I&#039;ve met respect the chain of command, regardless of their opinion of the person in command.  Our military has now served under two draft-dodging presidents without public spectacle or complaint.

Honestly, to suggest that they would refuse to serve an elected Commander in Chief strikes me as a statement as insulting as anything Rall has put in a cartoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason, my comments which accompanied the above quote weren&#8217;t posted.  Here they are again:</p>
<p>Most military people I&#8217;ve met respect the chain of command, regardless of their opinion of the person in command.  Our military has now served under two draft-dodging presidents without public spectacle or complaint.</p>
<p>Honestly, to suggest that they would refuse to serve an elected Commander in Chief strikes me as a statement as insulting as anything Rall has put in a cartoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DT</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61520</link>
		<dc:creator>DT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61520</guid>
		<description>Rich, where did you get your degree in constitutional law...last time I checked, President Bush was still the Commander in Chief, not Hillary and certainly not Nancy.  When you accuse the leader of a country with criminal misuse, you should attempt to back it up or you lose all credibility.  (Credibility among the liberal left is as likely as virginity among hookers).

But I do agree that the military won&#039;t leave in droves.  Unlike the far left, the military loves their country and are not so shallow as to desert her in her time of need.  More likely it will be that if Hillary and co. take charge, they will continue Bill&#039;s policy of gutting the national defense and intelligence communities in favor of having more &quot;social&quot; programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich, where did you get your degree in constitutional law&#8230;last time I checked, President Bush was still the Commander in Chief, not Hillary and certainly not Nancy.  When you accuse the leader of a country with criminal misuse, you should attempt to back it up or you lose all credibility.  (Credibility among the liberal left is as likely as virginity among hookers).</p>
<p>But I do agree that the military won&#8217;t leave in droves.  Unlike the far left, the military loves their country and are not so shallow as to desert her in her time of need.  More likely it will be that if Hillary and co. take charge, they will continue Bill&#8217;s policy of gutting the national defense and intelligence communities in favor of having more &#8220;social&#8221; programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshM</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61519</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61519</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;If Hillary Clinton is elected, weâ€™ll wind up having to bring back the draft, because she has allowed the radical fringe to pull her so far left that many in the military will not accept her as Commander in Chief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;If Hillary Clinton is elected, weâ€™ll wind up having to bring back the draft, because she has allowed the radical fringe to pull her so far left that many in the military will not accept her as Commander in Chief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Stromoski</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61505</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Stromoski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61505</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;If Hillary Clinton is elected, weâ€™ll wind up having to bring back the draft, because she has allowed the radical fringe to pull her so far left that many in the military will not accept her as Commander in Chief.


I hear and read this sort of blanket condemnation of Hilary Clinton quite often, yet no specific &quot;radical fringe&quot; examples of policy is ever given to back it up. Can we have some examples of some far left radical proposals that are specific to HC? Because from what I can tell, she&#039;s a typical lobbyist courting- business as usual politician. And can you site examples of your claim that the military would leave in droves and the draft reinstated if she is elected? This reeks of unsubstantiated claims one hears on the Hannity-Limbaugh-Drudge propaganda mill.

 I think you&#039;ll find if one looks at the actual facts that it&#039;s been Bush that has depleted the military given the rash of 2. 3 and 4 star generals that have chosen early retirement over continuing his failed policies as well as a severe decline in the rank and file re-enlisting as well as a severe depletion of first time enlistments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;If Hillary Clinton is elected, weâ€™ll wind up having to bring back the draft, because she has allowed the radical fringe to pull her so far left that many in the military will not accept her as Commander in Chief.</p>
<p>I hear and read this sort of blanket condemnation of Hilary Clinton quite often, yet no specific &#8220;radical fringe&#8221; examples of policy is ever given to back it up. Can we have some examples of some far left radical proposals that are specific to HC? Because from what I can tell, she&#8217;s a typical lobbyist courting- business as usual politician. And can you site examples of your claim that the military would leave in droves and the draft reinstated if she is elected? This reeks of unsubstantiated claims one hears on the Hannity-Limbaugh-Drudge propaganda mill.</p>
<p> I think you&#8217;ll find if one looks at the actual facts that it&#8217;s been Bush that has depleted the military given the rash of 2. 3 and 4 star generals that have chosen early retirement over continuing his failed policies as well as a severe decline in the rank and file re-enlisting as well as a severe depletion of first time enlistments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Stromoski</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61503</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Stromoski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61503</guid>
		<description>Equating disagreement with the current administrations foreign policy and it&#039;s criminal misuse of the military in which it was entrusted with &quot;hating&quot; America and hating the &quot;Military&quot; is a plain and simplistic inflamatory propaganda technique designed to squelch any sort of reasoned examination of the issue.

There are a couple of ways that one can love their country. One way is how a young child loves their Mother. Mommy is all good, I love Mommy no matter what. Mommy can do no wrong.. Whatever she does is always right and if you don&#039;t agree with that then you&#039;re bad and I hate you.

There is another way to love your country, like one would a spouse. You love them and You expect them to always do the right thing, to be fair and just and settle conflict in a reasoned, well mature manner. To be open to criticism and other points of view without feeling threatened. To always tell the truth and when they make a mistake or mislead, own up to it and correct it. And when they are wrong, to admit it and strive be their best.

Given the jingositic climate and near sainthood status enjoyed by American servicemen in the U.S. since the Reagan administration , I &#039;m very skeptical of any supposed incidence where a member of the military has been spat on within the last 25 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Equating disagreement with the current administrations foreign policy and it&#8217;s criminal misuse of the military in which it was entrusted with &#8220;hating&#8221; America and hating the &#8220;Military&#8221; is a plain and simplistic inflamatory propaganda technique designed to squelch any sort of reasoned examination of the issue.</p>
<p>There are a couple of ways that one can love their country. One way is how a young child loves their Mother. Mommy is all good, I love Mommy no matter what. Mommy can do no wrong.. Whatever she does is always right and if you don&#8217;t agree with that then you&#8217;re bad and I hate you.</p>
<p>There is another way to love your country, like one would a spouse. You love them and You expect them to always do the right thing, to be fair and just and settle conflict in a reasoned, well mature manner. To be open to criticism and other points of view without feeling threatened. To always tell the truth and when they make a mistake or mislead, own up to it and correct it. And when they are wrong, to admit it and strive be their best.</p>
<p>Given the jingositic climate and near sainthood status enjoyed by American servicemen in the U.S. since the Reagan administration , I &#8216;m very skeptical of any supposed incidence where a member of the military has been spat on within the last 25 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Douglass</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61492</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Douglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 03:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2007/07/24/ted-rall-and-michelle-malkin-get-into-blogging-tiff/#comment-61492</guid>
		<description>When my then 17 year old son was talking about joining the Marines, I said, &quot;Son, you could die.&quot;  He replied, &quot;Mom, don&#039;t you think this country is worth dying for?&quot;

Here&#039;s what Ted Rall and the other military haters, and America haters are doing...they&#039;re making people like my son -- who has literally been spat at more than once in uniform -- think: screw you, go do it yourself.

If Hillary Clinton is elected, we&#039;ll wind up having to bring back the draft, because she has allowed the radical fringe to pull her so far left that many in the military will not accept her as Commander in Chief.

Would you choose to risk your life and live and work in emotionally and physically extreme conditions for a bunch of ingrates back home who think you&#039;re stupid and a wannabe rapist and murderer?

Some of these people who are making American&#039;s not want to serve will likely be drafted themselves, or their sons will be.  There&#039;s the irony, or the poetic justice.  Then again, theyâ€™ll probably run away to Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When my then 17 year old son was talking about joining the Marines, I said, &#8220;Son, you could die.&#8221;  He replied, &#8220;Mom, don&#8217;t you think this country is worth dying for?&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what Ted Rall and the other military haters, and America haters are doing&#8230;they&#8217;re making people like my son &#8212; who has literally been spat at more than once in uniform &#8212; think: screw you, go do it yourself.</p>
<p>If Hillary Clinton is elected, we&#8217;ll wind up having to bring back the draft, because she has allowed the radical fringe to pull her so far left that many in the military will not accept her as Commander in Chief.</p>
<p>Would you choose to risk your life and live and work in emotionally and physically extreme conditions for a bunch of ingrates back home who think you&#8217;re stupid and a wannabe rapist and murderer?</p>
<p>Some of these people who are making American&#8217;s not want to serve will likely be drafted themselves, or their sons will be.  There&#8217;s the irony, or the poetic justice.  Then again, theyâ€™ll probably run away to Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
