<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN: Who reads the comics anymore?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2006/05/04/cnn-who-reads-the-comics-anymore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2006/05/04/cnn-who-reads-the-comics-anymore/</link>
	<description>The source for industry news for the professional cartoonist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malc McGookin</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2006/05/04/cnn-who-reads-the-comics-anymore/#comment-66888</link>
		<dc:creator>Malc McGookin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=922#comment-66888</guid>
		<description>I know. I didn&#039;t say you said they were right. Just what I thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know. I didn&#8217;t say you said they were right. Just what I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malc McGookin</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2006/05/04/cnn-who-reads-the-comics-anymore/#comment-98684</link>
		<dc:creator>Malc McGookin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=922#comment-98684</guid>
		<description>I know. I didn&#039;t say you said they were right. Just what I thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know. I didn&#8217;t say you said they were right. Just what I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pab Sungenis</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2006/05/04/cnn-who-reads-the-comics-anymore/#comment-66877</link>
		<dc:creator>Pab Sungenis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=922#comment-66877</guid>
		<description>Malc, I didn&#039;t say they were right, just what they thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malc, I didn&#8217;t say they were right, just what they thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pab Sungenis</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2006/05/04/cnn-who-reads-the-comics-anymore/#comment-98683</link>
		<dc:creator>Pab Sungenis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=922#comment-98683</guid>
		<description>Malc, I didn&#039;t say they were right, just what they thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malc, I didn&#8217;t say they were right, just what they thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malc McGookin</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2006/05/04/cnn-who-reads-the-comics-anymore/#comment-66871</link>
		<dc:creator>Malc McGookin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=922#comment-66871</guid>
		<description>Pab, advertisers know absolutely nothing, even about their own business.

There is nary a week goes by without advertisers being proved wrong and commonly held beliefs amongst advertisers being exploded.

Advertising wisdom is akin to the story of the intelligent spider who could understand spoken commands. If told &quot;move two steps right&quot; it would do so. One by one the advertiser pulled off its limbs. Then, when it remained still after numerous instructions, the advertiser pronounced that a spider&#039;s ears were located in its legs.

I don&#039;t doubt that old people are more set in their ways, advertisers don&#039;t need to tell us that, but they are also more perceptive, less likely to be swayed by an undercooked or sophomoric new feature which doesn&#039;t touch them. THAT&#039;s the reason new stuff is unlikely to sway them.

Dumb old people don&#039;t look at the comics, just as dumb younger people don&#039;t. Ask your average 25 year-old bonehead at work to name a comic and he&#039;ll say Mickey Mouse, Superman or Spiderman. Only the brighter bulbs will single out Pearls or Get Fuzzy, and they will include all age groups.

If Dilbert was launched today it would get as much support from the over 60s as the under 30s, the problem is not that older people are intransigent, it&#039;s that there are no more Dilberts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pab, advertisers know absolutely nothing, even about their own business.</p>
<p>There is nary a week goes by without advertisers being proved wrong and commonly held beliefs amongst advertisers being exploded.</p>
<p>Advertising wisdom is akin to the story of the intelligent spider who could understand spoken commands. If told &#8220;move two steps right&#8221; it would do so. One by one the advertiser pulled off its limbs. Then, when it remained still after numerous instructions, the advertiser pronounced that a spider&#8217;s ears were located in its legs.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t doubt that old people are more set in their ways, advertisers don&#8217;t need to tell us that, but they are also more perceptive, less likely to be swayed by an undercooked or sophomoric new feature which doesn&#8217;t touch them. THAT&#8217;s the reason new stuff is unlikely to sway them.</p>
<p>Dumb old people don&#8217;t look at the comics, just as dumb younger people don&#8217;t. Ask your average 25 year-old bonehead at work to name a comic and he&#8217;ll say Mickey Mouse, Superman or Spiderman. Only the brighter bulbs will single out Pearls or Get Fuzzy, and they will include all age groups.</p>
<p>If Dilbert was launched today it would get as much support from the over 60s as the under 30s, the problem is not that older people are intransigent, it&#8217;s that there are no more Dilberts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malc McGookin</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2006/05/04/cnn-who-reads-the-comics-anymore/#comment-98682</link>
		<dc:creator>Malc McGookin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=922#comment-98682</guid>
		<description>Pab, advertisers know absolutely nothing, even about their own business.

There is nary a week goes by without advertisers being proved wrong and commonly held beliefs amongst advertisers being exploded.

Advertising wisdom is akin to the story of the intelligent spider who could understand spoken commands. If told &quot;move two steps right&quot; it would do so. One by one the advertiser pulled off its limbs. Then, when it remained still after numerous instructions, the advertiser pronounced that a spider&#039;s ears were located in its legs.

I don&#039;t doubt that old people are more set in their ways, advertisers don&#039;t need to tell us that, but they are also more perceptive, less likely to be swayed by an undercooked or sophomoric new feature which doesn&#039;t touch them. THAT&#039;s the reason new stuff is unlikely to sway them.

Dumb old people don&#039;t look at the comics, just as dumb younger people don&#039;t. Ask your average 25 year-old bonehead at work to name a comic and he&#039;ll say Mickey Mouse, Superman or Spiderman. Only the brighter bulbs will single out Pearls or Get Fuzzy, and they will include all age groups.

If Dilbert was launched today it would get as much support from the over 60s as the under 30s, the problem is not that older people are intransigent, it&#039;s that there are no more Dilberts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pab, advertisers know absolutely nothing, even about their own business.</p>
<p>There is nary a week goes by without advertisers being proved wrong and commonly held beliefs amongst advertisers being exploded.</p>
<p>Advertising wisdom is akin to the story of the intelligent spider who could understand spoken commands. If told &#8220;move two steps right&#8221; it would do so. One by one the advertiser pulled off its limbs. Then, when it remained still after numerous instructions, the advertiser pronounced that a spider&#8217;s ears were located in its legs.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t doubt that old people are more set in their ways, advertisers don&#8217;t need to tell us that, but they are also more perceptive, less likely to be swayed by an undercooked or sophomoric new feature which doesn&#8217;t touch them. THAT&#8217;s the reason new stuff is unlikely to sway them.</p>
<p>Dumb old people don&#8217;t look at the comics, just as dumb younger people don&#8217;t. Ask your average 25 year-old bonehead at work to name a comic and he&#8217;ll say Mickey Mouse, Superman or Spiderman. Only the brighter bulbs will single out Pearls or Get Fuzzy, and they will include all age groups.</p>
<p>If Dilbert was launched today it would get as much support from the over 60s as the under 30s, the problem is not that older people are intransigent, it&#8217;s that there are no more Dilberts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Diesslin</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2006/05/04/cnn-who-reads-the-comics-anymore/#comment-66862</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Diesslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 21:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=922#comment-66862</guid>
		<description>Then why are they written to a 6th grade level of understanding? ;) (rhetorical question)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why are they written to a 6th grade level of understanding? ;) (rhetorical question)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Diesslin</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2006/05/04/cnn-who-reads-the-comics-anymore/#comment-98681</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Diesslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=922#comment-98681</guid>
		<description>Then why are they written to a 6th grade level of understanding? ;) (rhetorical question)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why are they written to a 6th grade level of understanding? ;) (rhetorical question)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pab Sungenis</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2006/05/04/cnn-who-reads-the-comics-anymore/#comment-66854</link>
		<dc:creator>Pab Sungenis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=922#comment-66854</guid>
		<description>Malc, 35 is the cutoff point because of the demographics used by advertising agencies.

Key demographics include 18-34 and 35-54.  18-34 is particularly coveted because most people in that demographic have weak brand loyalties and are more willing to try different products.  35-54 have stronger brand loyalties than 18-34, but more disposable income.  

55+ are considered too set in their ways for most advertisers to specifically target them, unless it&#039;s something specifically aimed at that age group (like AARP, life insurance, hair color, etc.).

That&#039;s why papers want to get readers 18-34, because advertisers want to reach those people most of all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malc, 35 is the cutoff point because of the demographics used by advertising agencies.</p>
<p>Key demographics include 18-34 and 35-54.  18-34 is particularly coveted because most people in that demographic have weak brand loyalties and are more willing to try different products.  35-54 have stronger brand loyalties than 18-34, but more disposable income.  </p>
<p>55+ are considered too set in their ways for most advertisers to specifically target them, unless it&#8217;s something specifically aimed at that age group (like AARP, life insurance, hair color, etc.).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why papers want to get readers 18-34, because advertisers want to reach those people most of all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pab Sungenis</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2006/05/04/cnn-who-reads-the-comics-anymore/#comment-98680</link>
		<dc:creator>Pab Sungenis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=922#comment-98680</guid>
		<description>Malc, 35 is the cutoff point because of the demographics used by advertising agencies.

Key demographics include 18-34 and 35-54.  18-34 is particularly coveted because most people in that demographic have weak brand loyalties and are more willing to try different products.  35-54 have stronger brand loyalties than 18-34, but more disposable income.  

55+ are considered too set in their ways for most advertisers to specifically target them, unless it&#039;s something specifically aimed at that age group (like AARP, life insurance, hair color, etc.).

That&#039;s why papers want to get readers 18-34, because advertisers want to reach those people most of all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malc, 35 is the cutoff point because of the demographics used by advertising agencies.</p>
<p>Key demographics include 18-34 and 35-54.  18-34 is particularly coveted because most people in that demographic have weak brand loyalties and are more willing to try different products.  35-54 have stronger brand loyalties than 18-34, but more disposable income.  </p>
<p>55+ are considered too set in their ways for most advertisers to specifically target them, unless it&#8217;s something specifically aimed at that age group (like AARP, life insurance, hair color, etc.).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why papers want to get readers 18-34, because advertisers want to reach those people most of all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
